This paper addresses the question of what potential queer pornography has to subvert hegemonic discourses of gender and sexuality. In particular, it engages in the analysis of transitivity and metaphor in an example of queer written online pornography and links this textual analysis to a discussion of the role of text distribution and consumption in realising any subversive potential. The analysis shows that in terms of participant representation, the text reinforces rather than challenges hegemonic discourses of gender and sexuality: Although the main protagonists are both ambiguously sexed, patterns of transitivity and use of metaphor construct largely binary gender identities for them, allocating sexual activity to the first-person narrator while casting the Other as passively desiring. In terms of its distribution and consumption, however, the text maintains its subversive potential as it sexualises a public online space and can turn offline public space into a sexual place.
2014Porn studies: An introduction. Porn Studies 11: 1–6.
2004Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 321: 346–359.
2005Public Discourses of Gay Men. London: Routledge.
2002Is queer theory important for sociolinguistic theory? In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 25–43. Stanford: CSLI.
Bell, David & Valentine, Gill
1995Introduction: Orientations. In Mapping Desires: Geographies of Sexualities, David Bell & Gill Valentine (eds), 1–27. London: Routledge.
Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira
2004Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 331: 469–515.
Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don
2003Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1989Pornography: Men Possessing Women. New York: E.P. Dutton.
Glenn, John D.
1981Gay fantasies in gay publications. In Gayspeak: Gay Male and Lesbian Communication, James W. Chesebro (ed), 104–113. New York: The Pilgrim Press.
Green, Adam I., Follert, Mike, Osterlund, Kathy & Paquin, Jamie
2010. Space, place and sexual sociality: Towards an ‘atmospheric analysis’. Gender, Work and Organization 17: 7-27.
Halliday, Michael A.K. & Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M.
2014Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge.
1997‘The object of desire is the object of contempt’: Representations of masculinity in Straight to Hell magazine. In Language and Masculinity, Sally Johnson & Ulrike H. Meinhof (eds), 188–207. Oxford: Blackwell.
(ed)1972The Case Against Pornography. London: Tom Stacey.
Ingram, Gordon B., Bouthillette, Anne-Marie & Retter, Yolanda
(eds)1997Queers in Space: Communities, Public Places, Sites of Resistance. Seattle: Bay Press.
Jones, Rodney H.
2008Technology, democracy and participation in space. In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, Ruth Wodak & Veronika Koller (eds), 429–446. Berlin: de Gruyter.
2002Playing the straight man: Displaying and maintaining male heterosexuality in discourse. In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 249–266. Stanford: CSLI.
King, Brian W.
2011Language, sexuality and place: The view from cyberspace. Gender and Language 51: 1–30.
2022. Words and Worlds of Desire: The Power of Metaphor in Framing Sexuality. In Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities [Synthese Library, 453], ► pp. 363 ff.
2018. Doing the naughty or having it done to you? Agent roles in erotic writing. Porn Studies 5:2 ► pp. 156 ff.
2023. Give it to her. Journal of Language and Sexuality 12:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Seehuus, Martin, Ariel B. Handy & Amelia M. Stanton
2021. Change in the Popularity of Transgressive Content in Written Erotica between 2000 and 2016. The Journal of Sex Research 58:3 ► pp. 314 ff.
2022. Queer Sinophone Malaysia: Language, Transnational Activism, and the Role of Taiwan. Journal of Intercultural Studies 43:3 ► pp. 303 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.