Article published in:
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Vol. 6:2 (2017) ► pp. 262291


Agha, Asif
2011aLarge and small scale forms of personhood. Language & Communication 31(3): 171–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011bMeet mediatization. Language & Communication 31(3): 163–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Lawrence
2015AntConc 3.5.0. Tokyo: Waseda University. http://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net/ (January 10 2016)
Bangeles, De Mar M., Serentas, Warlito S., Tik-Ing, Lezlie Jean A. & Tarusan, Mary Ann E.
2015Spornosexual: A case study. Psychology 6(9): 1067–1076. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2007Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics 4(1): 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan & Bulcaen, Chris
2000Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 29(1): 447–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1989Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory 7(1): 14–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Danah M. & Ellison, Nicole B.
2008Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1): 210–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cafri, Guy & Thomson, J. Kevin
2004Measuring male body image: A review of the current methodology. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 5(1): 18–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don
2003Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John Edward
2004Getting It On Online: Cyberspace, Gay Male Sexuality and Embodied Identity. Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 289 ]
Connell, Raewyn & Messerschmidt, James
2005Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society 19(6): 829–859. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Connell, Robert W.
1995Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1998Masculinities and globalization. Men and Masculinities 1(1): 3–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Samantha & Bridges, Sara K.
2010The drive for muscularity in men: Media influences and objectification theory. Body Image 7(1): 32–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Costa, Peter
2014Reconceptualizing cosmopolitanism in language and literacy education: Insights from a Singapore school. Research in the Teaching of English 49(1): 9–30.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally
2013Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989Language and Power. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Fracher, Jeffrey & Kimmel, Michael
1995Hard issues and soft spots: Counseling men about sexuality. In Men’s Lives, Michael Kimmel & Michael Messner (eds), 365–374. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Freberg, Karen, Graham, Kristin, McGaughey, Karen & Freberg, Laura A.
2011Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review 37(1): 90–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, Barbara L. & Roberts, Tomi-Ann
1997Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly 21(2): 173–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Rosalind, Henwood, Karen & McLean, Carl
2005Body projects and the regulation of normative masculinity. Body and Society 11(1): 37–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1979Gender Advertisements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hakim, Jamie
2015Fit is the new rich: Male embodiment in the age of austerity. Soundings 61: 84–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiramoto, Mie & Teo, Shi Ling Cherise
2015Heteronormative love makes a house a home: Multimodal analysis of luxury housing ads in Singapore. Journal of Language and Sexuality 4(2): 223–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Chris
Jaffe, Alexandra
2011Sociolinguistic diversity in mainstream media: Authenticity, authority and processes of mediation and mediatization. Journal of Language and Politics 10(4): 562–586. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Mee-Eun
1997The portrayal of women’s images in magazine advertisements: Goffman’s gender analysis revisited. Sex Roles 37(11–12): 979–996. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jackson
1999Tough Guise: Violence, Media and the Crisis in Masculinity [DVD]. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation.Google Scholar
2006Macho Paradox: Why Some Men Hurt Women and How All Men Can Help. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.Google Scholar
Kaur, Gurveen
[ p. 290 ]
Keith, Thomas
2008Generation M: Misogyny in Media and Culture [DVD]. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation.Google Scholar
Khoo, Michele & Karan, Kavita
2007Macho or metrosexual: The branding of masculinity in FHM magazine in Singapore. Intercultural Communication Studies 16(1): 34–45.Google Scholar
Kilbourne, Jean
2010Killing Us Softly 4: Advertising’s Image of Women [DVD]. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation.Google Scholar
Krotz, Friedrich
2009Mediatization: A concept with which to grasp media and societal change. In Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences, Knut Lundby (ed), 21–40. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lawler, Steph
2011Symbolic capital. In Encyclopedia of Consumer Culture, Dale Southerton (ed), 1418–1420. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leap, William
2003Language and gendered modernity. In The Handbook of Language and Gender, Janet Holmes & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds), 401–422. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Louie, Kam
2003Chinese, Japanese and global masculine identities. In Asian Masculinities: The Meaning and Practice of Manhood in China and Japan, Kam Louie & Morris Low (eds), 1–15. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Louie, Kam & Edwards, Louise
1994Chinese masculinity: Theorizing wen and wu . East Asian History 8: 135–148.Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice E. & Boyd, Danah
2010I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Aihwa
1999Flexible Citizenship. The Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Lena
2015‘Poppin’ bottles, getting wheysted.’ Exploring young men’s engagement with fitspiration content and its consequential influences on attitudes and behavior. Journal of Promotional Communications 3(3): 425–445.Google Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul
2014Cartographies of language: Making sense of mobility among Korean transmigrants in Singapore. Language & Communication 39: 83–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohlinger, Deana A.
2002Eroticizing men: Cultural influences on advertising and male objectification. Sex Roles 46(3): 61–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Kim Bartel
2004Controversies in Contemporary Advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shilling, Chris
2003The Body and Social Theory. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Squires, Lauren
2010Enregistering internet language. Language in Society 39(4): 457–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 291 ]
Tan, Yue, Shaw, Ping, Cheng, Hong & Kim, Kwangmi Ko
2013The construction of masculinity: A cross-cultural analysis of men’s lifestyle magazine advertisements. Sex Roles 69: 237–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teo, Peter
2000Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society 11(1): 7–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wee, Lionel
2012Neoliberalism and the regulation of consumers: Legalizing casinos in Singapore. Critical Discourse Studies 9(1): 15–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Hall, Kira, Rodrigo Borba & Mie Hiramoto
2020.  In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Pak, Vincent & Mie Hiramoto
2020. “Itching to make an impact”: constructing the mobile Singaporean voluntourist in Instagram travel narratives. Social Semiotics  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Starr, Rebecca Lurie, Tianxiao Wang & Christian Go
2020. Sexuality vs. sensuality: The multimodal construction of affective stance in Chinese ASMR performances*. Journal of Sociolinguistics 24:4  pp. 492 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.