Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Narrative and Life History
Vol. 1:2/3 (1991) ► pp.155–167

Conceptualization Via Narrative: A Discussion of Donald E. Polkinghorne's "Narrative and Self-Concept"

| Clark University
Published online: 4 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.1.2-3.05con
References (69)
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. HolquistTrans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
(1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1986). A functional approach to the acquisition of anaphoric relationships. Linguistics, 241, 227–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987). The acquisition of narratives: Learning to use language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990a). The German perfekt: Form and function of tense alternations. Studies in Language, 14(2), 253–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990b). [Review of Life metaphors: Stories of Ordinary Survival by Catherine Sullivan Norton]. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 51, 195–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). Voices of curing and caring: The role of vagueness and ambiguity in informed consent discussions. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
(in press). Narrative as perspective taking: The role of emotionals, negations, and voice in the construction of the story realm. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.
Bamberg, M., & Damrad-Frye, R. (in press). On the ability to provide evaluative comments: Further explorations of children's narrative competencies. Journal of Child Language.
Bamberg, M., & Marchman, V. (in press). Binding and unfolding: Towards the linguistic construction of narrative discourse. Discourse Processes.
Barthes, R. (1975). An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History, 71, 237–272. (Reprinted from Communications, 1966, 8, 1-27) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, A. L. (1979). Text-building, epistemology, and aesthetics in Javanese shadow theatre. In A. L. Becker & A. A. Yengoyan (Eds.), The imagination of reality: Essays in Southeast-Asian coherence systems (pp. 211–243). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bellah, R. N., Madison, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Boyd, Z., & Boyd, J. (1977). To lose the name of action: The semantics of action and motion in Tennyson's poetry. PTL: A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory, 21, 21–32.Google Scholar
Budwig, N. (1991). Language and informed consent: The presentation of treatment options. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1946). Language and myth. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
(1953). Philosophie der symbolischen Formen (2nd ed.) [Philosophy of symbolic forms] Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Chvany, C. V. (1985). Background perfectives and plotline imperfectives. In M. S. Flier & A. H. Timberlake (Eds.), The scope of Slavic aspect (pp. 247–273). Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. (1980). Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In W. Chafe (Ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production (pp. 127–202). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cohler, B. J. (1982). Personal narrative and life course. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 41, pp. 205–241). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
(1988). The human studies and the life history: The Social Service Review lecture. Social Service Review, 371, 552–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coste, D. (1989). Narrative as communication. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
DeLancey, S. (1987). Transitivity in grammar and cognition. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 53–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P. (1987). Actions and procedural directions. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 69–89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorfmüller-Karpusa, K. (1990). Intensity markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(3), 476–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1988). Making a mind versus modeling the brain: Artificial intelligence back at a branchpoint. In S. R. Graubard (Ed.), The artificial intelligence debate (pp. 15–43). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1990). Towards a reconciliation of phenomenology and AI. In D. Partridge & Y. Wilks (Eds.), The foundations of artificial intelligence (pp. 396–410). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, S. (1990). Referential linking and the interpretation of tense. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(1), 57–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, B. (1987). Anaphora in popular written English narratives. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 157–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B. (1990). An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(3), 383–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics. Journal of Education, 171(1), 5–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). A linguistic approach to narrative. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 11, 15–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1987). Moral orientation and moral development. In E. F. Kittay & D. T. Meyers (Eds.), Women and moral theory (pp. 19–36). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
(1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34(3), 223–237.Google Scholar
Givon, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 121, pp. 213–241). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
(1982). Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 561, 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kail, M., & Hickmann, M. (in press). French children's ability to introduce referents in narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language.
Kemme, H.-M. (1979). Ja, denn, doch usw.: Die Modalpartikeln im Deutschen [Ja, denn, doch, etc.: Modal particles in German]. München: Goethe-Institut, Arbeitsstelle fur wissenschaftliche Didaktik.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1984). Intensity. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (pp. 43–70). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Michaels, S. (1981). "Sharing time": Children's narrative styles and different access to literacy. Language in Society, 10(3), 423–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norton, C. S. (1989). Life metaphors: Stories of ordinary survival. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and language development: Language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child's narrative. New York: Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1991). Narrative and self-concept [this issue]. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 11, 135–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rathmayr, R. (1985). Die russischen Partikeln als Pragmalexeme [Russian particles as pragmatic lexemes]. München: Verlag Otto Sagner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. (1990). The give and take of everday life: Language socialization of Kaluli children. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 254–283). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomlin, R. S. (1987). Linguistic reflections of cognitive events. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 455–479). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wald, B. (1987). Cross-clause relations and temporal sequence in narrative and beyond. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 481–512). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1988). The fragmentation of discourse in the nuclear arms debate. Multilingua, 71, 11–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weydt, H., Harden, T., Hentschel, E., & Rösier, D. (1983). Kleine deutsche Partikellehre [Brief introduction to German particles]. Stuttgart: Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1976). Particles and linguistic relativity. International Review of Slavic Linguistics, 11, 327–367.Google Scholar
(1986). Introduction [to special issue on "Particles"]. Journal of Pragmatics, 101, 519–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilensky, R. (1982a). Points: A theory of the structure of stories in memory. In W. G. Lehnert & M. H. Ringle (Eds.), Strategies for natural language processing (pp. 345–374). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
(1982b). Story grammars revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 423–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1983). Planning and understanding: A computational approach to human reasoning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1987). Tense meanings as styles in fictional narrative. Poetics, 161, 53–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

McVee, Mary B.
2004. Narrative and the exploration of culture in teachers’ discussions of literacy, identity, self, and other. Teaching and Teacher Education 20:8 ► pp. 881 ff. DOI logo
Quigley, Jean
2001. Psychology and Grammar. Theory & Psychology 11:2 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Belzen, Jacob A.
1996. Beyond a Classic? Hjalmar Sunden's Role Theory and Contemporary Narrative Psychology. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 6:3 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Bamberg, Michael
1994. Actions, events, scenes, plots and the drama. Language and the constitution of part-whole relationships. Language Sciences 16:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Schiffrin, Deborah
1994. Making a list. Discourse Processes 17:3 ► pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Hermans, Hubert J. M., Trix I. Rijks & Harry J. G. Kempen
1993. Imaginal Dialogues in the Self:Theory and Method. Journal of Personality 61:2 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Bamberg, Michael & Nancy Budwig
1992. Therapeutic Misconceptions: When the Voices of Caring and Research Are Misconstrued as the Voice of Curing. Ethics & Behavior 2:3 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.