Article published In:
Journal of Narrative and Life HistoryVol. 2:2 (1992) ► pp.151–161
Roots of Response
Abstract
Response to literature involves a transaction between reader and author where meaning is constructed by the reader, using the blueprints, or signs, provided by the author. According to Fish (1980a), readers and authors implicitly know the conventions of response by virtue of being members of the same interpretive community. This socially acquired knowledge enables readers and authors to conjointly create, identify, and respond to literature. Currently, increased re-search into the teaching and learning of literature has led to a renewed examina-tion of classroom techniques directed toward "teaching" response. This article presents data which suggests that many young children begin formal schooling with a predisposition, or readiness, for literary response. Evidence for this comes from a study of preliterate kindergarten children who were asked to "pretend to read" to a pretend child (doll) from a wordless picture book (Purcell-Gates, 1988). Cast in the authorial role, these children used language which proved to enhance and constrain imaging for reader response. This communicative compe-tence is interpreted through Fish's notion of an interpretive community within which literary conventions are implicitly learned. Knowledge of both the product and process of acquisition of this knowledge held by entering school children should inform discussions of instructional methodology regarding reader re-sponse. (Literacy Education)
References (16)
Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Advances in discourse processes: Vol. 10. Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Chafe, W., & Danielewicz, J. (1986). Properties of spoken and written language. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 83–113). New York: Academic.
Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist poetics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 
Fish, S. (1980a). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(1980b). Literature in the reader: Affective stylistics. In J. P. Tompkins (Ed.), Reader-response criticism (pp. 70–100). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
Holdaway, D. (1979). The foundations of literacy. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In Labov (Ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns (pp. 354–396). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Langer, J. (1989). The process of understanding literature (Report Series 2.1). Albany: Center for the Learning and Teaching of Literature, University of Albany, State University of New York.
(1990). The process of understanding: Reading for literary and informative purposes. Research in the Teaching of English, 241, 119–160.
Morris, C. (1971). Writings on the general theory of signs The Hague: Mouton.
Purcell-Gates, V. (1988). Lexical and syntactic knowledge of written narrative held by well-read-to kindergartners and second graders. Research in the Teaching of English, 221, 128–160.
Purcell-Gates, V., & Dahl, K. (1991). Low-SES children's success and failure at early literacy learning in skills-based classrooms. JRB: A Journal of Literacy, 231, 1–34.
Rader, M. (1982). Context in written language: The case of imaginative fiction. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 185–198). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Tompkins, J. P. (1980). An introduction to reader-response criticism. In J. P. Tompkins (Ed.), Reader-response criticism (pp. ix–xxvi). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Uchikoshi, Yuuko
2005. Narrative Development in Bilingual Kindergarteners: Can Arthur Help?. Developmental Psychology 41:3 ► pp. 464 ff. 
Gauvain, Mary, Susan Savage & Deanne McCollum
2000. Reading at Home and at School in the Primary Grades: Cultural and Social Influences. Early Education & Development 11:4 ► pp. 447 ff.
Benton, Stephen L.
1997. Psychological Foundations of Elementary Writing Instruction. In Handbook of Academic Learning, ► pp. 235 ff.
Purcell‐Gates, Victoria
1996. Stories, Coupons, and the TV Guide: Relationships Between Home Literacy Experiences and Emergent Literacy Knowledge. Reading Research Quarterly 31:4 ► pp. 406 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.