Article published in:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 33:1 (2018) ► pp. 48–91

Singaporean internet chit chat compared to informal spoken language

Linguistic variation and indexicality in a language contact situation

| University of Muenster, Germany
| University of Freiburg, Germany
| University of Trier, Germany
This paper compares data from a Singaporean chit chat forum to informal spoken data. We first perform a qualitative analysis of text samples in a framework of indexicality. Then we present quantitative findings for two (sets of) features each of the contact variety Singlish (particles, the kena-passive) and spoken English in general (discourse markers, contractions). For the former some similarities are observed but we also find that the forum contributors tend to be creative and innovative in their choice of particles. In this connection we argue that they index specific subgroup identities and further point out that Singlish is a rather flexible set of resources. Our findings differ from those of previous research on Jamaican Creole as used in an internet forum, thus showing that the use of contact varieties in computer-mediated communication can take different forms. The general features of spoken English are used comparatively less in the forum data, indicating that using Singlish features in writing is not tantamount to writing down spoken language. Moreover, we draw attention to features of computer-mediated communication in in the chit chat forum data. Finally we discuss implications in terms of the Dynamic Model of the evolution of Postcolonial Englishes (Schneider 2007).
Keywords: Singlish, computer-mediated communication, sociolinguistic approach
Published online: 07 May 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00002.deu
References

References

Aijmer, Karin
2013 Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Alsagoff, Lubna
2007 Singlish: Negotiating Culture, Capital and Identity. In Viniti Vaish, S. Gopinathan & Yongbing Liu (eds.), Language, capital, culture: Critical studies of language and education in Singapore, 25–46. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
2010 English in Singapore: Culture, capital and identity in linguistic variation. World Englishes 29. 336–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 The development of English in Singapore: Language policy and planning in nation building. In Ee-Ling Low & Azirah Hashim (eds.), English in Southeast Asia: Features, policy and language use, 137–154. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alsagoff, Lubna & Ho Chee Lick
1998 The grammar of Singapore English. In Joseph A. Foley et al. (eds.), English in new cultural contexts: Reflections from Singapore, 127–151. Singapore: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Allsopp, Richard
1996 Dictionary of Caribbean English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Gisle
2001 Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis
2006 Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10. 419–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto
2004 The evolution of Singapore English: Finding the matrix. In Lisa Lim (ed.), Singapore English: A grammatical description, 127–149. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming
2009  One in Singapore English. Studies in Language 33. 338–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 A usage-based approach to substratum transfer: The case of four unproductive features in Singapore English. Language 86. 792–820. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 The making of vernacular Singapore English: System, transfer, and filter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bao, Zhiming & Lionel Wee
1999 The passive in Singapore English. World Englishes 18. 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 85 ]
Baron, Naomi S.
2003 Language of the internet. In Ali Farghali (ed.), The Stanford handbook for language engineers, 59–127. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Besemeres, Mary & Anna Wierzbicka
2003 Pragmatics and cognition: The meaning of the particle lah in Singapore English. Pragmatics & Cognition 11. 3–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bokhorst-Heng, Wendy
1999 Singapore’s Speak Mandarin Campaign: Language ideological debates in the imagining of the nation. In Jan Blommaert (ed.), Language ideological debates, 235–265. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Debating Singlish. Multilingua 24. 185–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley & Bee Chin Ng
2014 The dynamics of multilingualism in contemporary Singapore. World Englishes 33. 307–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, David West & Teo Shi Jie
2014 Singapore English and styling the Ah Beng . World Englishes 33. 60–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy
2006 Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cavallaro, Francesco, Bee Chin Ng & Mark Fifer Seilhamer
2014 Singapore Colloquial English: Issues of prestige and identity. World Englishes 33. 378–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collot, Milena & Nancy Belmore
1996 Electronic language: a new variety of English. In Susan Herring (ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives, 147–170. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
2006 Language and the internet. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeCamp, David
1971 Towards a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Pidginisation and creolisation of languages, 349–370. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar
2014 English in the Caribbean: Variation, style and standards in Jamaica and Trinidad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar & Lars Hinrichs
2007 Dynamics of orthographic standardization in Jamaican Creole and Nigerian Pidgin. World Englishes 26. 22–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar & Andrea Sand
2013 Computer-mediated communication in Singapore: Spoken language features in weblogs and a discussion forum. In Katrin Röder & Ilse Wischer (eds.), Anglistentag 2012 Potsdam: Proceedings, 385–396. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Dürscheid, Christa
2004 Netzsprache – ein neuer Mythos. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie 68. 141–157.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2008 Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12. 453–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41. 87–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 86 ]
Fong, Vivien
2004 The verbal cluster. In Lisa Lim (ed.), Singapore English: A grammatical description, 75℃104. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2015 At the interface of contact linguistics and second language acquisition research: New Englishes and Learner Englishes compared. English World-Wide 36. 90–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Anthea Fraser
1992a Contact features of Singapore Colloquial English. In Kingsley Bolton & Helen Kwok (eds.), Sociolinguistics today: International perspectives, 323–345. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1992b The pragmatic particles of Singapore Colloquial English. Journal of Pragmatics 18. 31–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 The Step-Tongue: Children’s English in Singapore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
2006a Epistemic modalities and the discourse particles of Singapore. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles, 243–263. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2006b Singlish on the web. In Azirah Hashim & Norizah Hassan (eds.), Varieties of English in South East Asia and beyond, 19–37. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.Google Scholar
2014 One world, one English. In Katrin Schöpe, Renate Belentschikow, Angelika Bergien, Armin Burkhardy & Karen Ebeling (eds.), Pragmantax II: Zum Aktuellen Stand der Linguistik und ihrer Teildisziplinen. Akten des 43. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Magdeburg, 2008, 613–634. Frankfurt on Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Heyd, Theresa
2014 Doing race and ethnicity in a digital community: Lexical labels and narratives of belonging in a Nigerian web forum. Discourse, Context and Media 4–5. 38–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 The metacommunicative lexicon of Nigerian Pidgin. World Englishes 34. 669–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heyd, Theresa & Christian Mair
2014 From vernacular to digital ethnolinguistic repertoire: The case of Nigerian Pidgin. In Véronique Lacoste, Jakob Leimgruber & Thiemo Breyer (eds.), Indexing authenticity: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 242–266. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars
2006 Codeswitching on the web: English and Jamaican Creole in e-mail communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars & Jessica White-Sustaíta
2011 Global Englishes and the sociolinguistics of spelling: A study of Jamaican blog and email writing. English World-Wide 32. 46–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leimgruber, Jakob R. E.
2009 Modelling variation in Singapore English. Oxford: University of Oxford Ph.D. dissertation. http://​jakobleimgruber​.ch​/papers​/dissertation​.pdf (12 December, 2014.)
2012 Singapore English: An indexical approach. World Englishes 31. 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a The management of multilingualism in a city-state: Language policy in Singapore. In Peter Siemund, Ingrid Gogolin, Monika Edith Schulz & Julia Davydova (eds.), Multilingualism and language diversity in urban areas: Acquisition, identities, space, education, 229–258. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 87 ]
2013b Singapore English: Structure, variation, and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016  Bah in Singapore English. World Englishes 35: 78–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le Page, Robert B. & Andrée Tabouret-Keller
1985 Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ler, Soon Lay Vivien
2006 A relevance-theoretic approach to discourse particles in Singapore English. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles, 149-166. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lewin, Beverly A. & Yonatan Donner
2002 Communication in internet message boards: A quantitative analysis of usage in computer-mediated conversation. English Today 71. 29–37.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig
(eds.) 2013 Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 17th edn. Dallas: SIL International. http://​www​.ethnologue​.com/ (12 December, 2014.)
Lim, Lisa
2007 Mergers and acquisitions: On the ages and origins of Singapore English particles. World Englishes 26. 446–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 The Grammar of Spoken Singapore English Corpus (GSSEC): Ground rules and conventions. http://​www​.english​.hku​.hk​/staff​/lisalim​.htm (9 February, 2015.)
Lim, Lisa & Umberto Ansaldo
2016 Language in Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa & Joseph A. Foley
2004 English in Singapore and Singapore English. In Lisa Lim (ed.), Singapore English: A grammatical description, 1–18. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian
2009 Corpus linguistics meets sociolinguistics: Studying educated spoken usage in Jamaica on the basis of the International Corpus of English. In Lucia Siebers & Thomas Hoffmann (eds.), World Englishes: Problems, properties and prospects. Selected papers from the 13th IAWE Conference, 39–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Corpora and the New Englishes: Using the ‘Corpus of Cyber-Jamaican’ to explore research perspectives for the future. In Fanny Meunier, Sylvie De Cock, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Magali Paquot (eds.), A taste for corpora: In honour of Sylviane Granger, 209–236. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maynor, Natalie
1994 The language of electronic mail: Written speech? In Greta D. Little & Michael Montgomery (eds.), Centennial usage studies, 48–54. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Jim
2009  Like and other discourse markers. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds.), Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand English, 317–337. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moll, Andrea
2012 Orthographic practices in diasporic Jamaican online communities: Between idiosyncratic usage and ‘grassroots’ conventionalization. In Anne Schröder, Ulrich Busse & Ralf Schneider (eds.), Codification, canons, and curricula: Description and prescription in language and literature, 283–302. Bielefeld: Aisthesis.Google Scholar
2015 Jamaican Creole goes web: Sociolinguistic styling and authenticity in a digital ‘Yaad’. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Simone
2005 Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 88 ]
Nelson, Gerald
1996 The design of the corpus. In Sidney Greenbaum (ed.), Comparing English worldwide: The International Corpus of English, 27–53. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
2002 Markup manual for spoken texts. http://​ice​-corpora​.net​/ice​/manuals​.htm (12 December, 2014.)
Oenbring, Raymond
2013  Bey or bouy: Orthographic patterns in Bahamian Creole English on the web. English World-Wide 34. 341–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ooi, Vincent B. Y. & Peter K. W. Tan
2014 Facebook, linguistic identity and hybridity in Singapore. In Rani Rubdy & Lubna Alsagoff (eds.), The global-local interface and hybridity, 225–244. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ooi, Vincent B. Y., Peter K. W. Tan & Andy K. L. Chiang
2007 Analyzing personal weblogs in Singapore English: The Wmatrix approach. In Päivi Pahta, Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Jukka Tyrkkö (eds.), Towards multimedia in Corpus Studies. Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/02​/ooi​_et​_al/ (12 December, 2014.)
Pakir, Anne
1991 The range and depth of English-knowing bilinguals in Singapore. World Englishes 10. 167–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, Peter L.
1999 Urban Jamaican Creole: Variation in the mesolect. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Platt, John T.
1975 The Singapore English speech continuum and its basilect ‘Singlish’ as a ‘creoloid’. Anthropological Linguistics 17. 363–374.Google Scholar
Platt, John
1987 Communicative functions of particles in Singapore English. In Ross Steele & Terry Gold (eds.), Language topics: Essays in honour of Michael Halliday, vol. 2, 391–401. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Poedjosoedarmo, Gloria R.
1995 Lectal variation in the media and the classroom: A preliminary analysis of attitudes. In Teng, Su Ching & Ho Mian-Lian (eds.), The English language in Singapore: Implications for teaching, 53–67. Singapore: Singapore Association for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rajah-Carrim, Aaliya
2009 Use and standardisation of Mauritian Creole in electronically mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14. 484–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubdy, Rani
2001 Creative destruction: Singapore’s Speak Good English Movement. World Englishes 20. 341–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Runkehl, Jens, Peter Schlobinski & Torsten Siever
1998 Sprache und Kommunikation im Internet: Überblick und Analysen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Sand, Andrea
2013 Singapore weblogs: Between speech and writing. In Magnus Huber and Joybrato Mukherjee (eds.), Corpus linguistics and variation in English: Focus on non-native Englishes. Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/journal​/volumes​/13​/sand/ (9 February, 2015.)
Sandhu, Kernial Singh
1993 Indian immigration and settlement in Singapore. In Kernial Singh Sandhu & A. Mani (eds.), Indian Communities in Southeast Asia, 775–788. Singapore: Times Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2007 Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Squires, Lauren
2010 Enregistering internet language. Language in Society 39. 457–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 89 ]
Schweinberger, Martin
2014 The discourse marker LIKE: a corpus-based analysis of selected varieties of English. Hamburg: University of Hamburg Ph.D. dissertation. http://​ediss​.sub​.uni​-hamburg​.de​/volltexte​/2014​/6969​/pdf​/Dissertation​.pdf (12 December, 2014.)
Silverstein, Michael
2003 Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23. 193–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smakman, Dick & Stephanie Wagenaar
2013 Discourse particles in Colloquial Singapore English. World Englishes 32. 308–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speak Good English Movement
2005 Professor Koh Tai Ann’s interview with Straits Times Deputy Editor, Felix Soh. http://​www​.goodenglish​.org​.sg​/category​/movement​/over​-the​-years​/2005​/media​-coverage​-2005 (14 August, 2013.)
2010 Interview with SGEM chairman, Goh Eck Kheng. http://​www​.goodenglish​.org​.sg​/about​/read​-blog​/news​-updates​/stand​-on​-singlish/ (27 June, 2011.)
Tagliamonte, Sali
2005  So who? Like how? Just what? Discourse markers in the conversations of young Canadians. Journal of Pragmatics 37. 1896–1915. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tan, Peter K. W., Vincent B. Y. Ooi & Andy K. L. Chiang
2003 Pragmatic particles in computer-mediated communication: The case of internet relay chat in Singapore. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Speech, Writing and Context, Osaka.
2004 Signalling spokenness in personal advertisements on the Web: The case of ESL countries in South East Asia. In Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds.), Advances in Corpus Linguistics: Papers from the 23rd International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 23), 151–167. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Tan, Ying Ying
2014 English as a ‘mother tongue’ in Singapore. World Englishes 33. 319–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, Constance Mary
1996 A history of Singapore: 1819–1988. 3rd edn. Singapore: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wee, Lionel
2003 The birth of a particle: Know in Colloquial Singapore English. World Englishes 22. 5–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004a Reduplication and discourse particles. In Lisa Lim (ed.), Singapore English: A grammatical description, 105–126. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004b Singapore English: Morphology and syntax. In Bernd Kortmann & Edgar W. Schneider (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, vol. 2: Morphology and syntax, 1058–1072. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2006 The semiotics of language ideologies in Singapore. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10. 344–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 The particle ya in Colloquial Singapore English. World Englishes 29. 45–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Metadiscursive convergence in the Singlish debate. Language & Communication 31. 75–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wee, Lionel & Umberto Ansaldo
2004 Nouns and noun phrases. In Lim (ed.), 57–74.Google Scholar
[ p. 90 ]
Wee, Lionel & Wendy D. Bokhorst-Heng
2005 Language policy and nationalist ideology: Statal narratives in Singapore. Multilingua 24. 159–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Jock O.
2014 The culture of Singapore English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Wee Kim
(ed.) 2011 Census of Population 2010 Statistical Release 1: Demographic characteristics, education, language and religion. Singapore: Department of Statistics. http://​www​.singstat​.gov​.sg​/publications​/publications​_and​_papers​/cop2010​/census​_2010​_release1​/cop2010sr1​.pdf (12 December, 2014.)
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Lising, Loy, Pam Peters & Adam Smith
2020. Code-switching in online academic discourse. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 41:2 ► pp. 131 ff. Crossref logo
Ziegeler, Debra
2020. Changes in the functions of already in Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 35:2 ► pp. 293 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.