Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 33:2 (2018) ► pp.386–410

The adaptation of French liquids in Haitian

A test of the perceptual hypothesis

| CNRS | Paris 8
Haitian, a French-lexifier creole with a Gbe substrate, shows an asymmetry in the way it has adapted French liquids: the French lateral was maintained in postvocalic coda position in Haitian, but the French rhotic was systematically deleted in this position. This paper presents the results of a perception study showing that the lateral is generally more perceptible than the rhotic in coda position in Modern French. The hypothesis that perception played a role in the phonological asymmetry in Haitian is compatible with these results. The paper sketches an analysis of how the perceptual asymmetry between French coda laterals and rhotics resulted in the emergence of a new phonological grammar, distinct from both the grammar of the substrate and superstrate languages. This analysis is in line with previous works on the role of perception in second language acquisition, loanword adaptation, creolization, and sound change more generally.
Keywords: Haitian, French, creole, liquids, syllable, perception
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The distribution of liquids in Haitian, Modern French, and Gbe
    • 1.2The phonological hypothesis and the phonetic hypothesis
    • 1.3Goal
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Stimuli
    • 2.2Task
    • 2.3Participants
    • 2.4Analysis
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Potential limitations of this study
    • 4.2Acoustic analyses
    • 4.3Implications of the results in word-medial contexts
    • 4.4The role of perception in grammar change
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00020.sto
References (42)
References
Alwan, Abeer, Jintao Jiang, & Willa Chen. 2011. Perception of place of articulation for plosives and fricatives in noise. Speech Communication 531. 195–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Bruce Hayes. 2001. Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 321. 45–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2018. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 6.0.39, [URL]. (26 April, 2018.)
Bordal, Guri. 2012. A phonological study of French spoken by multilingual speakers from Bangui, the capital of the Central African Republican. In Randall Gess, Chantal Lyche, & Trudel Meisenburg (eds.), Phonological variation in French: Illustrations from three continents, 23–43. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boutin, Béatrice A. & Gabor Turcsan. 2009. La prononciation du français en Afrique: la Côte d’Ivoire. In Jacques Durand, Bernard Laks, & Chantal Lyche (eds.), Phonologie, variation et accents du français, 131–152. Paris: Hermès Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Brousseau, Anne-Marie & Emmanuel Nikiema. 2006. From Gbe to Haitian: The multi-stage evolution of syllable structure. In Claire Lefebvre, Lydia White, & Christine Jourdan (eds.), L2 acquisition and creole genesis, 295–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Glenn S. & K. Geoffrey White. 2005. The optimal correction for estimating extreme discriminability. Behavior Research Methods 371. 436–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capo, Hounkpati. 1991. A comparative phonology of Gbe. Berlin/New York: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafcouloff, Michel. 1985. The spectral characteristics of the lateral /l/ in French. Travaux de l’Institut de Phonétique d’Aix 101. 63–98.Google Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène. 2004. Consonant cluster simplification in Québec French. Probus 161. 151–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1959. L’/r/ parisien et autres sons du pharynx. The French Review 431. 5–22.Google Scholar
Dupoux, Emmanuel, Kazuhiko Kakehi, Yuki Hirose, Christophe Pallier, & Jacques Mehler. 1999. Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance 251. 1568–1578.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil. 1989. Chinese subjects’ perception of the word-final English /t/–/d/ contrast: Performance before and after training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 861. 1684–1697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fouché, Pierre. 1952. Phonétique historique du français. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile. 2007. Word boundaries and contrast neutralization in the case of enchaînement in French. In Jennifer Cole & Jose Ignacio Hualde (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 91. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gbéto, Flavien. 2000. Les emprunts linguistiques d’origine européenne en Fon (nouveau Kwa, Gbe, Bénin) : une étude de leur intégration au plan phonético-phonologique. Koeln: Koeppe.Google Scholar
Gendrot, Cédric. 2014. Perception et réalisation du /r/ standard français en finale de mot. In XXXe édition des Journées détudes sur la Parole (JEP 2014), 193–201.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos & Flor Aarts. 1999. The dialect of Maastricht. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 291. 155–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heo, Young-Hyon & Lee, Ahrong. 2004. The phonological adaptation of foreign liquids in Korean. LSO Working Papers in Linguistics 41. 47–52.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung. 2010. The emergence of phonological adaptation from phonetic adaptation: English loanwords in Korean. Phonology 271. 225–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung, Andrea Hòa Phạm, & Benjamin Storme. 2016. French loanwords in Vietnamese: the role of input language phonotactics and contrast in loanword adaptation. In Adam Albright & Michelle A. Fullwood (eds.), Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Meeting on Phonology, [URL].(26 April, 2018.) DOI logo
Klingler, Thomas A. & Chantal Lyche. 2012. ‘Cajun French’ in a non-Acadian community. In Randall Gess, Chantal Lyche, & Trudel Meisenburg (eds.), Phonological variation in French: Illustrations from three continents, 275–312. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Michael D. & Eric-Jan Wagenmakers. 2013. Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, N. A. & C. D. Creelman. 2005. Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed..) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
New, Boris, Marc Brysbaert, Jean Veronis, & Christophe Pallier. 2007. The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics 281. 661–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikiema, Emmanuel & Parth Bhatt. 2003. Two types of r deletion in Haitian Creole. In Ingo Plag (ed.), Phonology and morphology of creole languages, 43–70. Tuebingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Carrie S. Masek, Roberta A. Hendrick, & Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Papers from the parasession on language and behavior, 178–203. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In Peter MacNeilage (ed.), The production of speech, 189–216. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon, Inga Vendelin, & Kimihiro Nakamura. 2008. On the perceptual origin of loanword adaptations: experimental evidence from Japanese. Phonology 251. 129–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL].
Russell Webb, Eric. 2008. Formalizing creole sound change: An optimality theoretic account. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 231. 227–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Creole phonological restructuring: The role of perception in contact-induced change. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 251. 263–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steele, Jeffrey & Anne-Marie Brousseau. 2006. Parallels in process: comparing Haitian Creole and French learner phonologies. In Claire Lefebvre, Lydia White, & Christine Jourdan (eds.), L2 acquisition and creole genesis, 331–352. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storme, Benjamin. 2017. The loi de position and the acoustics of French mid vowels. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2(1), 64, [URL]. (26 April, 2018.)
Tinelli, Henri. 1981. Creole phonology. The Hague/New York: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tranel, Bernard. 1987. The sounds of French: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdman, Albert. 1996. A learner’s dictionary of Haitian Creole. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Creole Institute.Google Scholar
. 2015. Haitian Creole: structure, variation, status, origin. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard. 2004. A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In Bruce Hayes, Robert Kirchner, & Donca Steriade (eds.), Phonetically-based phonology, 34–57. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winn, Matthew B., Monita Chatterjee, & William J. Idsardi. 2013. Roles of voice onset time and F0 in stop consonant voicing perception: Effects of masking noise and low-pass filtering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 561. 1097–1107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zink, Gaston. 1986. Phonétique historique du français : manuel pratique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Lahrouchi, Mohamed & Shanti Ulfsbjorninn
2024. Nasal Assimilation Counterfeeding and Allomorphy in Haitian: Nothing Is Still Something!. Linguistic Inquiry 55:2 ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Storme, Benjamin, Stéphane Térosier, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Montébran, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux, G. Merminod & G. Philippe
2024. Les voyelles du créole martiniquais. SHS Web of Conferences 191 ► pp. 02011 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.