Cover not available
Article published In:
Approaches to Variation in Creole Studies
Edited by Isabelle Léglise, Bettina Migge and Nicolas Quint
[Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 36:1] 2021
► pp. 77–108

Synchronic variation in Sri Lanka Portuguese personal pronouns

| Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
| Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
This paper presents and discusses the instances of synchronic variation attested in the personal pronoun paradigm of modern Sri Lanka Portuguese, an endangered Portuguese-based creole spoken by relatively small communities scattered across Eastern and Northern Sri Lanka. Although Sri Lanka Portuguese has a long history of documentation dating from, at least, the beginning of the 19th century, only a few studies have explicitly reported cases of synchronic variation. This study aims, therefore, to fill that gap, by contributing to the description and explanation of patterns of variation relating to the personal pronoun paradigm as encountered in documentary data collected between 2015 and 2020, over several field trips to the districts of Ampara, Batticaloa, Jaffna, and Trincomalee. The nature of the variation observed in the data ranges from phonetic alternations to strategies of paradigm regularization and stylistic shrinkage, often revealing the effects of diachronic processes of variant competition and substitution. Combining the observed patterns of variation with surveyed linguistic trends of language shift, we propose that obsolescence may be responsible for some of the variability encountered in modern SLP personal pronouns, especially that associated with certain socially- or geographically-defined subsets of the speech community (viz. the younger generations and the speakers from Jaffna) characterized by advanced language loss.
Keywords: Sri Lanka Portuguese, personal pronouns, variation, endangered languages, language obsolescence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Personal pronouns, diachrony and language contact
    • 2.2Early accounts of SLP personal pronouns
    • 2.3Data and methodology
  • 3.Modern SLP personal pronouns
  • 4.Variation
    • 4.1Variable forms
    • 4.2Monomorphemic vs. bimorphemic forms
    • 4.3Honorificity
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 25 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00070.car
References (49)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2020. Language contact and endangered languages. In Anthony Grant (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Contact, 241–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anon. 1826. O Livro de oraçaõ commum e administraçaõ de os sacramentos, e outros ritos e ceremonias de a Igreja, conforme de o uso de a Igreja de Inglaterra: Juntamente com o Psalterio, ou Psalmo de David. London: G. Ellerton & J. Henderson.Google Scholar
. 1851. O evangelho conforme de Santo Mattheos. Traduzido ne Indo-Portugueza. London: R. Clay.Google Scholar
. 1863. O livro de oraçaõs usado ne greyas de Wesleyanos ne Ilha de Ceylon. Colombo: Officio Wesleyano.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 2006. The Sri Lanka Sprachbund: The newcomers Portuguese and Malay. In Yaron Matras, April McMahon & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective, 135–159. New York: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1971. Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Berrenger. 1811. A grammatical arrangement on the method of learning the corrupted Portuguese as spoken in India. Colombo: Frans de Bruin.Google Scholar
Bhat, D. N. S. 2004. Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Callaway, John. 1818. A vocabulary; with useful phrases, and familiar dialogues; in the English, Portuguese, and Cingalese Languages. Colombo: Wesleyan Mission Press.Google Scholar
. 1820. A vocabulary, in the Ceylon Portuguese, and English languages, with a series of familiar phrases. Colombo: Wesleyan Mission Press.Google Scholar
. 1823. A Ceylon-Portuguese and English Dictionary. Colombo: Wesleyan Mission Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Martha C. Muntzel. 1989. The structural consequence of language death. In Nancy Dorian (ed.), Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Contraction and Death, 181–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Hugo C. 2007. Linguistic traces of colonial structure. In Eric Anchimbe (ed.), Linguistic identity in postcolonial multilingual spaces, 164–181. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2014. Factoring sociolinguistic variation into the history of Indo-Portuguese. Revista de Crioulos de Base Lexical Portuguesa e Espanhola 51. 87–114.Google Scholar
2017. Documentation of Sri Lanka Portuguese. London: SOAS, Endangered Languages Archive. [URL]. (26 July, 2019.)
Cardoso, Hugo C., Mahesh Radhakrishnan, Patrícia Costa & Rui Pereira. 2019. Documenting modern Sri Lanka Portuguese In Pinharanda-Nunes, Mário & Hugo Cardoso (eds.), Documentation and Maintenance of Contact Languages from South Asia to East Asia (Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication nr. 19), 1–33. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Hugo C., Tjerk Hagemeijer & Nélia Alexandre. 2015. Crioulos de base lexical portuguesa. In Maria Iliescu & Eugeen Roegiest (eds.), Manuel des Anthologies, Corpus et Textes Romans, 670–692. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chandralal, Dileep. 2010. Sinhala (London Oriental and African Language Library 15). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, J. Clancy. 1990. Deletion as an indicator of SVO → SOV shift. Language Variation and Change 21. 103–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalgado, Sebastião Rodolfo. 1900. Dialecto Indo-Português de Ceylão. Lisbon: Imprensa Nacional.Google Scholar
Fox, William Buckley. 1819. A Dictionary in the Ceylon-Portuguese, Singhalese, and English Languages. Colombo: Wesleyan Mission Press.Google Scholar
Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2003. Politeness Distinctions in Second Person Pronouns. In Friedrich Lenz (ed.), Deictic Conceptualization of Space, Time and Person, 185–202. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishiyama, Osamu. 2019. Diachrony of Personal Pronouns in Japanese. A functional and cross-linguistic perspective (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 344). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, vol. 21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, John & James Stanford. 2017. Documenting sociolinguistic variation in lesser-studied indigenous communities: Challenges and practical solutions. In Kristine A. Hildebrandt, Carmen Jany & Wilson Silva (eds.), Documenting Variation in Endangered Languages (Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication 13), 116–136. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2017. Writing a linguistic symphony: Analyzing variation while doing documentation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 62(4). 525–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGilvray, Dennis. 1982. Dutch Burghers and Portuguese mechanics: Eurasian ethnicity in Sri Lanka. Comparative Studies in Society and History 24(2). 235–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Naomi. 2009. The challenges of less commonly studied languages: Writing a sociogrammar of Faetar. In James Stanford & Dennis Preston (eds.), Variation in Indigenous Minority Languages, 397–417. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Documenting variation in (endangered) heritage languages: How and why? In Kristine A. Hildebrandt, Carmen Jany & Wilson Silva (eds.), Documenting Variation in Endangered Languages (Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication 13), 33–64. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Newstead, Robert. 1827. Um curto catichismo da Biblia, disposado em quarento divisaõs, todas as repostas per as perguntas sendo ne as palavras de a Santas Escrituras. Transl. of W. F. Lloyd. London: J.S. Hughes.Google Scholar
. 1852. O Novo Testamento de Nossa Senhor e Salvador Jesus Christo. Transl. of W. F. Lloyd. Colombo: Wesleyan Mission.Google Scholar
. 1871. Cantigas per adoraçaõ publico, em lingua portugueza de Ceylon. Colombo: Wesleyan Mission.Google Scholar
Nordhoff, Sebastian. 2013. The current state of Sri Lanka Portuguese. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 28(2). 425–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palosaari, Naomi & Lyle Campbell. 2011. Structural aspects of language endangerment. In Peter Austin & Julia Sallabank (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages, 100–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pereira, Rui. 2019. Sri Lanka Portuguese: A sociolinguistic perspective. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Association of Portuguese and Spanish-lexified Creoles & Summer Conference of the Society of Pidgin and Creole Linguistics. Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa, June 17th.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2001. Typological changes in language obsolescence. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals; An International Handbook, vol. 21, 1668–1677. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sippola, Eeva. 2018. Collecting and analysing creole data. In Wendy Ayres-Bennett & Janice Carruthers (eds.), Manual of Romance Sociolinguistics, 91–113. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Gender Distinctions in Independent Personal Pronouns. In Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Schiffman, Harold F. 1999. A Reference Grammar of Spoken Tamil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Ian. (coll.). 1973. Indo-Portuguese (Sri Lanka) (IRS01). PARADISEC. [URL] (27 July, 2019.)
. 1977. Sri Lanka Creole Portuguese phonology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PhD dissertation.
. 1979a. Convergence in South Asia: a creole example. Lingua 481- 193–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1979b. Substrata vs. universals in the formation of Sri Lanka Portuguese. Papers in Pidgin and Creole Linguistics 21. 183–200.Google Scholar
. 1984. The development of morphosyntax in Sri Lanka Portuguese. In Mark Sebba & Loreto Todd (eds.), York papers in Linguistics. York: University of York.Google Scholar
2013. Sri Lanka Portuguese. In Susanne M. Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.) The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages, Vol. II (Portuguese-based, Spanish-based, and French-based Languages), 111–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2016. The earliest grammars of Sri Lanka Portuguese. Papia 26(2). 237–281.Google Scholar
Tadmor, Uri. 2009. Loanwords in the world’s languages: Findings and results. In Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds.), Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook, 55–75. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomás, Maria Isabel. 1992. Os Crioulos Portugueses do Oriente; Uma Bibliografia. Macau: Instituto Cultural de Macau.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Cardoso, Hugo C.
2021. Convergence in the Malabar. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 36:2 ► pp. 298 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.