Cover not available
Review published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 37:1 (2022) ► pp.208–217
Book review

Tjerk Hagemeijer, Philippe Maurer-Cecchini & Armando Zamora Segorbe. A Grammar of Fa d’Ambô. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2020. 349 + xii pp.

Reviewed by
| CNRS, Université de Paris, France
Published online: 23 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00094.hag
References (22)
References
Barrena, Natalio. 1957. Gramática anabonesa. Madrid: Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Syntaxe générale: une introduction typologique I. Paris: Hermès Science.Google Scholar
Ferraz, Luiz Ivens. 1976. The substratum of Annobonese creole, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 71, 37–47.Google Scholar
Gougenheim, Georges. 1938. Le système grammatical de la langue française. Paris: Bibliothèque du français moderne.Google Scholar
Granda, Germán de. 1986. Retenciones africanas en la fonética del criollo portugués de Annobón. Revista de Filología Románica 41, 111–124.Google Scholar
Hagemeijer, Tjerk. 2013. Santome. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (eds), The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kihm, Alain. 2011. Substrate influences in Kriyol, Guinea-Bissau and Casamance Portuguese-related creole. In C. Lefebvre (ed.), Creoles, their Substrates, and Language Typology, 81–103. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Negation and negative concord in Guinea-Bissau Kriyol (in comparison with Portuguese, substrate-adstrate languages, and other Portuguese Creoles). In V. Déprez & F. Henri (eds), Negation and Negative Concord: The view from Creoles, 225–254. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Philippe. 2009. Principense. Grammar, Texts, and Vocabulary of the Afro-Portuguese Creole of the Island of Príncipe, Gulf of Guinea. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
. 2013. Papiamentu. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (eds), The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles & Jonathan D. Kaye. 1982. The syntactic bases for French liaison, Journal of Linguistics 18(2), 291–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omigie, Joy. 2017. Causative verbs in Edo. University of Benin Benin City.Google Scholar
Post, Marike. 1992. The serial verb construction in Fa d’Ambu. In E. d’Andrade & A. Kihm (eds), Actas do Colóquio sobre « Crioulos de Base Lexical Portuguesa », 153–169. Lisboa: Edições Colibri.Google Scholar
. 2013. Fa d’Ambô. In S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (eds), The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1888. Kreolische Studien I: Über das Negerportugiesische von Annobom, Sitzungsberichte der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien 116(I), 193–226.Google Scholar
Silveira, Alfredo, Ana Liva Agostinho, Manuele Bandeira, Shirley Freitas & Gabriel Araújo. 2013. Fa d’Ambô: Língua crioula de base portuguesa de Ano Bom, Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos 551, 25–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sippola, Eeva. 2017. Similarities and differences among Iberian creoles. In P. Bakker, F. Borchsenius, C. Levisen & E. Sippola (eds), Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, 241–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 2005. Inflecting clitics in Generalized Paradigm Function Morphology, Lingue e Linguaggio 4(2), 179–193.Google Scholar
Uchihara, Hiroto. 2010. Final paper: Pronominals in Edo – a descriptive study. Field Methods II. [URL]
Valkhoff, Marius. 1966. Studies in Portuguese and Creole. Johannesburg. Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Yakpo, Kofi. 2009. A Grammar of Pichi. Berlin/Accra: Isimu Media.Google Scholar
Zamora Segorbe, Armando. 2010. Gramática descriptiva del fá d’ambô. Madrid: Ceiba Ediciones.Google Scholar