Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Contact with Chinese
Edited by Zhiming Bao
[Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 38:1] 2023
► pp. 62–82

Uyghur speakers’ acquisition of Mandarin tones

 | Qufu Normal University, China
 | Peking University, China
This paper, based on Chinese and Uyghur language contact data collected through fieldwork, discusses in detail Uyghur speakers’ acquisition of Mandarin tones. Uyghur speakers map the three native pitch accents from the Uyghur prosodic system, i.e. level, rise, and fall, to the four Mandarin tones. Initially, this mapping is random. As Chinese proficiency improves, the accent-tone mapping becomes stable. The pace, however, is not uniform for the four tones, due to competition among the three accents to map unto a given Mandarin tone. After accent-tone mapping becomes stable, the mapped accents will gradually approximate towards their target tones in pitch value, again at an uneven pace. This quantitative study reveals a two-step process in the emergence of Uyghur Chinese tones: (1) the phonological step of accent-tone mapping involving tonal categories, (2) the phonetic approximation to tonal target. A Uyghur accent does not map directly to a superficially similar tone based on pitch value.
Keywords: language contact, acquisition of Mandarin tones, Uyghur Chinese, accent-tone mapping, tone approximation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Chinese and Uyghur prosodic systems
    • 2.1A comparison of tone systems in Mandarin and Turpan Chinese
    • 2.2Overview of the prosodic system of Uyghur language
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Materials
    • 3.3Procedure
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1The influence of exposure to competing languages
    • 5.2The stabilization of accent-tone mapping
    • 5.3The approximation of tone value in Uyghur Chinese
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 May 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00104.du
References (70)
References
Bao, Zhiming. 1990. On the nature of tone. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
. 1995. Syllable structure and partial reduplication in classical Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4(3). 175–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. The structure of tone. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. 1986. Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broselow, Ellen, Richard R. Hurtig, & Catherine Ringen. 1987. The perception of second language prosody. In Georgette Ioup & Steven H. Weinberger (eds.), Interlanguage Phonology: The Acquisition of a Second Language Sound System, 350–362. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Chang, Charles B. 2009. English loanword adaptation in Burmese. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 11. 77–94.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1930/1980. A system of Tone-letters. La Maitre Phonetique 45. 24–27. Reprinted in Fangyan 方言 [Dialect] 1980(2). 81–83.Google Scholar
. 1948. Mandarin primer. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren 赵元任. 1968/1979. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968. Hanyu kouyu yufa 汉语口语语法 [A grammar of spoken Chinese]. Translated by Lü Shuxiang, 吕叔湘. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Chen, Baoya 陈保亚. 1996. Lun yuyan jiechu yu yuyan lianmeng 论语言接触与语言联盟 [On language contact and linguistic union]. Beijing: Yuwen Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew Y. 2000. Tone sandhi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiang, Thomas. 1979. Some interferences of English intonations with Mandarin tones. International Review of Applied Linguistics 171. 245–250.Google Scholar
Du, Zhaojin 杜兆金 & Baoya Chen 陈保亚. 2017a. Yuyin biaoji xing yu Wei-Han shengdiao pipei 语音标记性与维汉声调匹配 [Markedness of phonological elements and tone match in Chinese-Uyghur contact]. Yuyan ji Yuyanxue 语言暨语言学 [Language and Linguistics] 18(3). 383–429.Google Scholar
. 2017b. Muyu leixing de duowei ganrao: Weiwu’er yu zhongyin moshi pipei Hanyu shengdiao de jizhi 母语类型的多维干扰: 维吾尔语重音模式匹配汉语声调的机制 [The multidimensional interference of mother tongue type: the mechanism of Uyghur stress pattern mapping Madarin tone]. Minzu Yuwen 民族语文 [Minority Languages of China] 2017(5). 43–60.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil. 1980. Phonetic approximation in second language acquisition. Language Learning 30(1). 117–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glewwe, Eleanor. 2015. Tonal assignment in English loanwords in Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.
Hao, Yen-Chen. 2009. Tonal adaptation of English loanwords. In Yun Xiao (ed.), Cantonese Proceedings of the 21st North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-21) 11, 42–54. Smithfield, Rhode Island: Bryant University.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2010. The handbook of language contact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Hai Yan 江海燕, Yan Liu 刘岩, & Li Lu 卢莉. 2010. Weiwu’er yu ci zhongyin shiyan yanjiu 维吾尔语词重音实验研究 [An experimental study of Uyghur word stress]. Minzu Yuwen 民族语文 [Minority Languages of China] 2010(3). 67–71.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 2005. Prosodic typology. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, 430–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 2006. Tone Loans: The adaptation of English loanwords into Yoruba. In John Mugane, John P. Hutchison, and Dee A. Worman (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, 136–146. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Kim, Tae-Eun. 2014. Preservation and deletion in Mandarin loanword adaptation. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1(2). 214–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kong, jiangping et al. 2012. Speech acoustics analysis system (SpeechLab) 1.0. Peking University, software copyright, certificate number: 0393010. National Copyright Administration of the PRC.Google Scholar
Kong, Jiangping 孔江平. 2015. Shiyan yuyin xue jichu jiaocheng 实验语音学基础教程 [Basic course of experimental phonetics]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
LaCharité, Darlene & Carole Paradis. 2005. Category preservation and proximity versus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. Linguistic Inquiry 36(2): 223–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, Kam-Ching. 1978. The Cantonese students in the Mandarin class: Some special problem. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association 131. 51–55.Google Scholar
Levi, Susannah V. 2005. Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35(1). 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Jian. 2017. Tonal adaptation of English loanwords in contemporary Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 45(2). 423–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Fu 刘复. 1924/1951. Sisheng shiyan lu 四声实验录 [Four tones experimental recording]. Shanghai: Shanghai Qunyi Publishing House. Reprinted in 1951. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.Google Scholar
Liu, Yan (ed.) 刘岩 (主编) (ed.). 2009. Zhongguo wu shengdiao shaoshu minzu xuexi Hanyu shengdiao yudiao de shiyan yanjiu 中国无声调少数民族学习汉语声调语调的实验研究 [An experimental study of the tones and intonation of the minority students’ learning Chinese]. Beijing: The Central University of Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Yan 刘岩, Ling Li 李玲, Na Ni 倪娜, Lijun Fan 范丽君, & Huaqin Chen 陈华琴. 2006. Weiwu’er zu xuesheng xuexi Hanyu shengdiao pianwu de shiyan yanjiu 维吾尔族学生学习汉语声调偏误的实验研究 [An experimental study of Uyghur students’ tone errors in learning Chinese]. Yuyan yu Fanyi 语言与翻译 [Language and Translation] 2006(2). 62–66+75.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2009. Language contact. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miao, Ruiqin. 2005. Loanword adaptation in Mandarin Chinese: Perceptual, phonological and sociolinguistic factors. SUNY, NY: Stony Brook University.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2008. Language evolution: contact, competition and change. London: Continuum International Publishing Group. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norman, Jerry. 1988. Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ozcelik, Oner. 2015. Stress or intonational prominence? Word accent in Kazakh and Uyghur. Turkic Languages 19(2). 163–192.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole & Darlene LaCharité. 2008. Apparent phonetic approximation: English loanwords in Old Quebec French. Journal of Linguistics 44(1): 87–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qu, Aitang 瞿霭堂. 1985. Han-Zang yuyan diaozhi yanjiu de jiazhi he fangfa 汉藏语言调值研究的价值和方法 [The value and method of the research of tone value in Sino Tibetan languages]. Minzu Yuwen 民族语文 [Minority Languages of China] 1986(6). 1–14.Google Scholar
Shen, Xiaonan 沈晓楠. 1989. Guanyu Meiguo ren xuexi Hanyu shengdiao 关于美国人学习汉语声调 [On Americans learning Mandarin tones]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue 世界汉语教学 [Chinese Teaching in the World] 1989(3). 158–168.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter & Noemi Kintana. 2008. Language contact and contact language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Daniel. 1992. Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: Evidence from Cantonese. Phonology 9(2). 289–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1952. Lexico-statistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96 (4). 452–463.Google Scholar
. 1955. Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. International Journal of American Linguistics 21(2). 121–137.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Wang, Li 王力. 1980. Hanyu shi gao 汉语史稿 [The Chinese history draft]. Reprinted in 2004. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.Google Scholar
Wang, William S-Y. 1967. Phonological features of tone. International Journal of American Linguistics 33(2). 93–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yunjia 王韫佳. 1995. Ye tan Meiguo ren xuexi Hanyu shengdiao 也谈美国人学习汉语声调 [On Americans learning Mandarin tones]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 语言教学与研究 [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 1995(3). 126–140.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2003. Contact-induced changes: classification and processes. Diachronica 22(2). 373–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Some issues in the study of language contact. Journal of Language Contact, Thema 11. 22–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald & Bettina Migge. 2007. Substrate influence on the emergence of the TMA systems of the Surinamese creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22(1). 73–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Hsiao-hung Iris. 2006. Stress to tone: a study of tone loans in Mandarin Chinese. In F.-F. Hsieh & M. Kenstowicz (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 52: Studies in Loanword Phonology, 227–253.Google Scholar
Wu, Zongji 吴宗济. 1996. Chao Yuan Ren xiansheng zai Hanyu shengdiao yanjiu shang de gongxian 赵元任先生在汉语声调研究上的贡献 [Mr. Chao Yuen Ren’s contribution to the study of Mandarin tones]. Qinghua Daxue Xuebao 清华大学学报 [Journal of Tsinghua University] 1996(3). 58–63.Google Scholar
Xu, Siyi 徐思益 & Liqin Gao 高丽琴. 1992. Guanyu Weiwu’er yu de zhongyin shengdiao wenti 关于维吾尔语的重音声调问题 [On the stress and intonation of Uyghur language]. Yuyan yu Fanyi 语言与翻译 [Language and Translation] 1992(3). 12–15.Google Scholar
Xu, Siyi 徐思益. 1997. Yuyan de jiechu yu yingxiang 语言的接触与影响 [The contact and influence of languages]. Wulumuqi: Xinjiang people’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Yakup, Abdurishid. 2005. The Turfan dialect of Uyghur. Turcologica 631. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Yakup, Mahire. 2013. Acoustic correlates of lexical stress in native speakers of Uyghur and L2 learners. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas dissertation.
Yakup, Mahire & Joan A. Sereno. 2016. Acoustic correlates of lexical stress in Uyghur. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 46(1). 61–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1980. The tonal phonology of Chinese. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation. Published in 1990. New York: Garland Publishing.
. 1993. Cantonese loanword phonology and optimality theory. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2(3). 261–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Tone in East Asian languages. In John A. Goldsmith (ed.), Handbook of Phonological Theory, 476–494. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2000. The complex interaction of tones and prominence. Paper presented at The 31th Conference of the North East Linguistic Proceeding (NELS 31) . Washington, D. C.
. 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yiu, Carine Yuk-man. 2012. Tonal adaptation of English loanwords in early Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 40(1). 190–215.Google Scholar
Yu, Aiqin 余霭芹. 1986. Shengdiao jiaoxue fa de shangque 声调教学法的商榷 [Discussion on tone teaching method]. Diyi Jie Guoji Hanyu Jiaoxue Taolun Hui Lunwen Xuan 第一届国际汉语教学讨论会论文选 [Selected papers on the First International Symposium on Chinese Language Teaching], 229–235. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.Google Scholar
Yu, Hui 于辉. 2014. Hanyu jieci yinxi xue: Ying yuan jieci de yuyin he yinxi fenxi 汉语借词音系学: 英源借词的语音和音系分析 [Chinese loanword phonology: A phonetic and phonological analysis of English loanword adaptation in Chinese]. Tianjin: Nankai University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Ruifeng 张锐锋 & Jiangpin Kong 孔江平. 2014. Henan Yuzhou fangyan shengdiao de shengxue ji ganzhi yanjiu 河南禹州方言声调的声学及感知研究 [A study of tone perception and perception in Yuzhou dialect of Henan]. Fangyan 方言 [Dialect] 2014(3). 206–214.Google Scholar
Zhou, Lei 周磊. 1995. Wulumuqi fangyan cidian 乌鲁木齐方言词典 [Urumqi dialect dictionary]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Education Publishing House.Google Scholar
. 1998. Tulufan Hanyu fangyan yinxi 吐鲁番汉语方言音系 [Sound system of Turpan dialect]. Fangyan 方言 [Dialect] 1998(2). 122–131.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xiaonong 朱晓农. 2004. Shanghai shengdiao shiyan lu 上海声调实验录 [Tone experiment recording of Shanghai Dialect]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Publishing House.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xuejia 朱学佳. 2007. Weiwu’er zu Hanyu shiyong bianyi yanjiu 维吾尔族汉语使用变异研究 [A study of Uyghur Chinese usage variation]. Beijing: Minzu University of China press.Google Scholar