Article published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 30:2 (2015) ► pp.357369
Adone, Dany
2012Language emergence and creolisation. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language - An international handbook, 862–889. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Philip
2001No creolisation without prior pidginisation? Te Reo 441. 31–50.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter
2012Review article. Hand talk: Sign language among American Indian Nations by Jeffrey E. Davis. International Journal of American Linguistics 78(1).127–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Creoles and typology: Problems of sampling and definition. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29(2). 437–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall & Ingo Plag
2013Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. In Parth Bhatt & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Creole languages and linguistic typology, 9–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [originally 2011: Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 5-42] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Julie Bakken Jepsen & Aymeric Daval-Markussen
2014Bibliography of studies linking creoles and sign languages. [URL]
Bickerton, Derek
1981Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
1984The language bioprogram hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 71. 173–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Adam Schembri & Bencie Woll
2010Diversity across sign languages and spoken languages: Implications for language universals. Lingua 120(12). 2664–2667. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, D
1971Education and creole English. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of language, 371–379. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Daval-Markussen, Aymeric
2014First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45(2). 274–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, Michel
(ed.) 1999Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development. Cambridge MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Deuchar, Margaret
1983Implications of sign language research for linguistic theory. In W. Stokoe & V. Volterra (eds.), Sign language research 83. 239–246.Google Scholar
Edwards, V. & P. Ladd
1983British sign language and West Indian Creole. In J.G. Kyle & B. Woll (eds.), Language in sign: An international perspective on Sign Language. London/Canberra: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1984The linguistic status of British Sign Language. Papers from the York Creole Conference, York Papers in Linguistics 111. 75–82.
Fischer, Susan D
1978Sign language and creoles. In P. Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 309–331. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gee, J.P. & W. Goodhart
1985Nativization, linguistic theory and deaf language acquisition’. Sign Language Studies 491. 291–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jepsen, Julie Bakken, Goedele De Clerck, Sam Lutalo-Kiingi & William B. McGregor
(eds.) 2015Sign languages of the World. A comparative handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kegl, Judy, Ann Senghas & Marie Coppola
1999Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In M. DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development, 179–237. Cambridge MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia & John Singler
2008Handbook of Pidgin and Creole studies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
2001Natural sign languages. In M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (eds.), Handbook of linguistics, 533–562. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H
2001The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5(2–3). 125–166.Google Scholar
2005Defining creole. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, R.P
1984Sign as creole. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7(2). 201–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, Richard P. & Elissa L. Newport
1990Out of the hands of babes: On a possible sign advantage in language acquisition. Language 66(1). 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
2010Emerging sign languages. In Marc Marschark & P. Spencer (eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language and education, Vol. 21. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber
2013The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ross E. & Michael Karchmer
2004Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies 4(2). 138–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter C
2015Conclusion: Feature distribution in the West Africa-Surinam Trans-Atlantic Sprachbund. In Pieter C. Muysken & Norval Smith, with Robert D. Borges (eds.), Surviving the Middle Passage. The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund, 393–408. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Nyst, Victoria
2012Shared sign languages. In Pfau, et al. (eds.), 552–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael
2008 The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki, & Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity, 265–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petitto, Laura Ann & Paula F. Marantette
1991Babbling in the manual mode: Evidence for the ontology of language. Science 2511. 1493–1496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Markus, Steinbach, & Bencie Woll
2012Sign language. An international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1991Typological contrasts between pidgin and creole languages in relation to their European language superstrates. In Johannes Bechert, Giuliano Bernini, & Claude Buridant (ed.), Toward a typology of European languages, 9–24. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schouwstra, Marieke
2012Semantic structures, communicative strategies and the emergence of language. Utrecht: LOT publications. 312.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Bernd Kortmann
2009The morphosyntax of varieties of English worldwide: A quantitative perspective. Lingua 1191. 1643–1663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taub, Sarah
2012Iconicity and metaphor. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 288–412. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Douglas
1971Grammatical and lexical affinities of creoles. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages, 293–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tervoort, Bernard
1961Esoteric symbolism in the communication behavior of young deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf 1061: 436–480.Google Scholar
Thompson, R.W
1961A note on the possible affinities between the Creole dialects of the Old World and the New. In R.B. LePage (ed.), Creole Language Studies II, 107–113. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka & Magnus Huber
2015Creoles and sign languages in comparison with non-creole spoken languages: A preliminary survey. Paper presented at the Tenth Creolistics Workshop “Innovations” with special attention to parallels between creole and sign language creation, Aarhus University, 8–10 April 2015.
Vos, Connie de & Roland Pfau
2015Sign language typology: The contribution of Rural sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 11. 8.1–8.24.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
2013Sign languages. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike & Connie De Vos
2012Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights (Sign Language Typology Series No. 4). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Zeshan, Ulrike & Nick Palfreyman
2020. Comparability of signed and spoken languages: Absolute and relative modality effects in cross-modal typology. Linguistic Typology 24:3  pp. 527 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.