Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 31:1 (2016) ► pp.184–199

Stepping back to move forward

An introspection on the history of some key questions driving our field

| University of Michigan, USA
Published online: 10 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.31.1.07bap
References (81)
Aboh, Enoch. 2009. Competition and selection: That’s all! In Enoch Aboh & Norval Smith (eds.), Complex processes in new languages, 317–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arends, Jacques. 1996. The early stages of creolization. Edited by Jacques Arends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall, & Ingo Plag. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 26(1). 5–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 2015. Creole languages have no… - but they do have … Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 30(1). 167–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bao, Zhiming & Lye Hui Min. 2005. Systemic transfer, topic prominence, and the bare conditional in Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 20(2). 269–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baptista, Marlyse. 2007. On the three –ist theories in creolistics and why they should be put to rest: The case of Réunionnais Creole. In Patrice Brasseur & Georges Daniel Véronique (eds.), Mondes Créoles et Francophones [a Festschrift in honor of Robert Chaudenson], 53–60. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
. 2012. On Universal grammar, the bioprogram hypothesis and Creole Genesis: An interview with Noam Chomsky. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 27(2). 351–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 71. 173–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bollée, Annegret. 2006. Every creole has its own history. Paper presented at the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics . Held in Albuquerque, New Mexico. January 7, 2006.
. 2007. Every creole has its own history. In Ursula Reutner (ed.), Bollée, Annegret. Beiträge zur Kreo- listik, 173–187. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert. 1974. Le Lexique du Parler Créole de la Réunion, vol. 21. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
. 2001. Creolization of language and culture. Revised in collaboration with Salikoko S. Mufwene. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Bare nouns in Réunionnais Creole. In Marlyse Baptista & Jacqueline Guéron (eds.), Noun phrases in Creole languages: A multifaceted approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coelho, Adolpho. 1880. Os dialectos românicos ou neolatinos na África, Ásia, e Ámerica. Bolletim da Sociedade de Geografia de Lisboa.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 1999. Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development. Edited by Michel DeGraff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Against Creole exceptionalism. Language 80(4). 834–839. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Linguists’ most dangerous myth. The fallacy of Creole exceptionalism. Language in Society 34(4). 533–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Creole exceptionalism and the (mis)education of the Creole speaker. In Jo Anne Kleifgen & George Bond (eds.), The languages of Africa and the Diaspora: Educating for language awareness, 124–144. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Essegbey, James. 2005. The basic locative construction in Gbe languages and Surinamese creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 20(2). 229–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Essegbey, James & Felix Ameka. 2007. “Cut” and “break” verbs in Gbe and Sranan. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 22(1). 37–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faraclas & Klein. (eds.). 2009. Simplicity and complexity in Creoles and Pidgins. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua. 1965. Yiddish in America: Socio-linguistic description and analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
. 1968. Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague, Paris: Mouton DOI logoGoogle Scholar
.1970. Sociolinguistics: A brief introduction. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.Google Scholar
. 1971. Bilingualism in the Barrio. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, Willliam. 2006. Universal constraints and local conditions in Pidginization: Case studies from New Guinea. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 21(1). 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Glenn. 1980. Pidgin and Creole languages: Selected essays by Hugo Schuchardt. Edited and translated by Glenn Gilbert. London/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. Hugo Schuchardt and the Atlantic Creoles: A newly discovered manuscript « On the Negro English of West Africa ». American Speech 60(1). 31–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grant, Anthony & Diana Guillemin. 2012. The complex of creole typological features: The case of Mauritian Creole. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 27(1). 48–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Robert. 1966. Pidgin and Creole languages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hiramoto, Mie. 2010. Dialect contact and change of the northern Japanese plantation immigrants in Hawai‘i. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Language 25(2). 229–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holm, John. 1988. Pidgins and Creoles: Theory and structure, vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holm, John & Incanha Intumbo. 2009. Quantifying superstrate and substrate influence. Journal of Pidgins & Creole Languages 24(2). 218–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson Kam, Carla. 2005. Where have all the children gone? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 20(2) 345–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huttar, George, James Essegbey, & Felix Ameka. 2007. Gbe and other West African sources of suriname creole semantic structures: Implications for creole genesis. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 22(1). 57–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia. 2010a. Creole studies and linguistic typology: Part 1. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 25(1). 173–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. Creole studies and linguistic typology: Part2. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 25(2). 359–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia & Darlene LaCharité. 2011. The typology of Caribbean Creole reduplication. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 26(1). 194–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire. 1999. Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar. (Cambridge studies in linguistics 88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Issues in the study of Pidgin and Creole languages. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire & Virginie Loranger. 2006. On the properties of Saramaccan FU*: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 21(2). 275–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire. 2011. Creoles, their substrates, and language typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mather, Patrick-André. 2006. Second language acquisition and creolization: Same (i-) processes, different (e-) results. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 21(2). 231–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2009. Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John. 1998. Identifying the Creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language 74(4). 788–818. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012a. The nature of argument: Is the Creole exceptionalism hypothesis dead? Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 27(2). 377–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. Case closed? Testing the feature pool hypothesis. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 27(1). 171–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath, & Magnus Huber. 2013. The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole language structures. (1st Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Migge, Bettina & Norval Smith. 2007. Introduction: Substrate influence in creole formation. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 22(1). 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 1986. The universalist and substrate hypotheses complement one another. In Pieter Muysken & Norval Smith (eds.), Substrata Versus Universals in Creole Genesis, 129–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Creolization is a social, not a structural, process. In Ingrid Neumann-Holzschuh & Edgar Schneider (eds.), Degrees of restructuring in Creole languages, 65–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The case was never closed: McWhorter misinterprets the ecological approach to the emergence of creoles. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 29(1). 157–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2008. Multifunctionality in Pitkern-Norf’k and Tok Pisin. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 23(1). 75–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 1981. Halfway between Quechua and Spanish: The case for relexification. In Arnold Highfield & Albert Valdman (eds.), Historicity and variation in creole studies, 52–78. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael. 2012. Papiamentu as one of the most complex languages in the world: A reply to Kouwenberg. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 27(1). 159–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2008a. Creoles as interlanguages: Inflectional morphology. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 23(1). 114–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. Creoles as interlanguages: Syntactic structures. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 23(2). 307–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009a. Creoles as interlanguages: Phonology. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 24(1). 119–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. Creoles as interlanguages: Word-formation. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 24(2). 339–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Creolization and admixture: Typology, feature pools, and second language acquisition. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 26(1). 89–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1881. Anzeige von: C. Baissac, Étude sur le patois créole mauricien. In F. Adolpho Coelho (eds.), Os dialectos romanicos ou neo-latinos na Africa, Asia e America, Zeitschrift für rom. Philologie 51. 580–581.Google Scholar
. 1883. Kreolische Studien IV. Über das Malaiospanische der Philippinen . SbW. 1051. 111–150.Google Scholar
. 1909. Die Lingua franca, Zeitschrift für rom . Philologie 331. 441–461.Google Scholar
. 1914. Die Sprache der Saramakkaneger in Surinam. Amsterdam: Johannes Müller.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani & John Rickford. 2009. AAVE/creole copula absence: A critique of the imperfect learning hypothesis. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 24(1). 53–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 2003. Substrate influence in creoles and the role of transfer in second language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition 251. 185–209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Links between SLA and Creole studies: Past and present. In Claire Lefebvre, Lydia White, & Christine Jourdan (eds.), L2 Acquisition and Creole Genesis: Dialogues, 15–46. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Pidgins/creoles and second language acquisition. The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Constraints on substrate transfer revisited. The Journal of Linguistics 48(2). 473–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singler, John Victor. 2006. Children and creole genesis. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 21(1). 157–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah. 2001. Language contact: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valli, André. 1994. A propos de l’emploi productif de la détermination zéro en moyen français et en créole réunionnais. In D. Véronique (ed.), Créolisation et Acquisition des Langues, 89–101. Aix-en-Provence: Presses de l’Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Véronique, Daniel. 1994. Naturalistic adult acquisition of French as L2 and French-based creole genesis compared: Insights into creolization and language change. In Dany Adone & Ingo Plag (Eds.), Creolization and Language Change, 117–137. Turbingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in contact: Findings and problems. New York.Google Scholar
. 2011. Languages in contact: French, German and Romansh in Twentieth-century Switzerland. Introduction and notes by Kim, Ronald and William Labov. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wekker, Herman. 1996. Creolization and the acquisition of English as a second language. In Herman Wekker (ed.), Creole languages and language acquisition, 139–149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whinnom, Keith. 1967. Linguistics: Pidgin and Creole languages. Robert A. Hall. American Anthropologist 691. 256–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2003. An introduction to contact linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell-Wiley.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald & Bettina Migge. 2007. Substrate influence on the emergence of the TMA systems of the Surinamese creoles. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages 22(1). 73–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Sessarego, Sandro
2020. Not all grammatical features are robustly transmitted during the emergence of creoles. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7:1 DOI logo
Montrul, Silvina & Carmen Silva-Corvalán
2019. THE SOCIAL CONTEXT CONTRIBUTES TO THE INCOMPLETE ACQUISITION OF ASPECTS OF HERITAGE LANGUAGES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:2 ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Baptista, Marlyse
2016. Creole formation and L2 acquisition. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31:2 ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Baptista, Marlyse
2017. Competition and selection in creole genesis. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 32:1 ► pp. 138 ff. DOI logo
Baptista, Marlyse
2017. Competing I-grammars in creole genesis. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 32:2 ► pp. 398 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.