The social meaning of Fanakalo (F) and the social motivation for using it in South Africa are the focus of this article. Ethnographic evidence assembled from a range of written sources reveals that largely unfavorable connotations are associated with F. On the strength of this data, the contextual characteristics of the use of F as an unmarked (or preferred) choice are described. It is shown that F is restricted to work (that is, to non-affective domains) and is used in interactions where there is an asymmetrical role and power relationship between the participants (best described as master-servant). Furthermore, F is negatively evaluated by Blacks, who are always the less powerful participants.
Also considered is oral ethnographic data, in the form of spontaneous, naturally-occurring interpersonal exchanges and self-reports on why people use F. Examination of this data shows that in marked settings, F is exploited as a conversational resource between South Africans, whether Black or White. It is shown that in marked settings F is a marker of solidarity, whereas in unmarked settings use of the language connotes power and domination.
2019. The Cambridge Handbook of African Linguistics,
Graber, Kathryn E.
2017. The Kitchen, the Cat, and the Table: Domestic Affairs in Minority‐Language Politics. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 27:2 ► pp. 151 ff.
Adendorff, Ralph
1995. A description of selected grammatical characteristics of mine fanakalo. South African Journal of Linguistics 13:sup27 ► pp. 3 ff.
Adendorff, Ralph
2002. Fanakalo: a pidgin in South Africa. In Language in South Africa, ► pp. 179 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.