Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 4:2 (2018) ► pp.182–207

Directions for the future of technology in pronunciation research and teaching

| University of Calgary
| University of Alberta | Simon Fraser University
| Radboud University
| Michigan State University
| Beuth University Berlin
| Brock University
| Radboud University
| Iowa State University
| Simon Fraser University
| University of Alberta
| Iowa State University
This paper reports on the role of technology in state-of-the-art pronunciation research and instruction, and makes concrete suggestions for future developments. The point of departure for this contribution is that the goal of second language (L2) pronunciation research and teaching should be enhanced comprehensibility and intelligibility as opposed to native-likeness. Three main areas are covered here. We begin with a presentation of advanced uses of pronunciation technology in research with a special focus on the expertise required to carry out even small-scale investigations. Next, we discuss the nature of data in pronunciation research, pointing to ways in which future work can build on advances in corpus research and crowdsourcing. Finally, we consider how these insights pave the way for researchers and developers working to create research-informed, computer-assisted pronunciation teaching resources. We conclude with predictions for future developments.
Keywords: pronunciation, technology, data, computer-assisted pronunciation teaching, research, future directions, automatic speech recognition, intelligibility, comprehensibility
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Current uses of technology in pronunciation research
    • 2.1Freeware
    • 2.2Automatic speech recognition (ASR)
    • 2.3Text to speech
    • 2.4The cloud
  • 3.Data collection
    • 3.1Spoken learner corpora
    • 3.2Collecting data through crowdsourcing
  • 4.Computer-assisted pronunciation teaching (CAPT)
    • 4.1Carrying out research on CAPT
    • 4.2Examples of effective CAPT and research
      • 4.2.1Visual tools
      • 4.2.2ASR tools
  • 5.Encouraging collaboration
  • 6.Future directions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 1 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.17001.obr
References (84)
References
Abel, J., Allen, B., Burton, S., Kazama, M., Noguchi, M., Tsuda, A., Yamane, N., & Gick, B. (2015). Ultrasound-enhanced multimodal approaches to pronunciation teaching and learning. Proceedings of acoustics week in Canada. Canadian Acoustics, 43(3), 124–125.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, D. (1949). Teaching pronunciation. English Language Teaching, 31, 113–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ballier, N., & Martin, P. (2016). Speech annotation of learner corpora. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 107–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. (2014). Exploring teachers’ knowledge of second language pronunciation techniques: Teacher cognitions, observed classroom practices, and student perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 481, 136–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2017). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.22. Retrieved from <[URL]> (15 November 2016).
Bueno Alastuey, M. C. (2010). Synchronous-voice computer-mediated communication: Effects on pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1987). Phonetics and the teaching or pronunciation. In J. Morley (Ed.), Current perspectives on pronunciation: Practices anchored in theory (pp. 87–100). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
Chun, D. M. (2013). Computer-assisted pronunciation teaching. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 823–834). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chun, D. M., Jiang, Y., Meyr, J., & Yang, R. (2015). Acquisition of L2 Mandarin Chinese tones with learner-created tone visualizations. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1(1), 86–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooke, M., Barker, J., & Lecumberri, M. L. G. (2013). Crowdsourcing in speech perception. In M. Eskenazi, G. -A. Levow, H. Meng, G. Parent, & D. Suendermann (Eds.), Crowdsourcing for speech processing: Applications to data collection, transcription and assessment (pp. 137–172). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2018). Automatic speech recognition for second language pronunciation assessment and training. In O. Kang, R. I. Thomson, & M. J. Murphy (Eds.), pp. 556–569. The Routledge handbook of English pronunciation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cucchiarini, C., Neri, A., & Strik, H. (2009). Oral proficiency training in Dutch L2: The contribution of ASR-based corrective feedback. Speech Communication, 51(10), 853–863. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H. & Boves, L. (2000a). Different aspects of expert pronunciation quality ratings and their relation to scores produced by speech recognition algorithm. Speech Communication, 30(2–3), 109–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2000b). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(2), 989–999. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H. & Boves, L. (2002). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(6), 2862–2873. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cucchiarini, C., Driesen, J., Van Hamme, H., & Sanders, E. (2008). Recording speech of children, non-natives and elderly people for HLT applications: The JASMIN-CGN corpus. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008 (pp. 1445–1450).Google Scholar
Darcy, I., Ewert, D., & Lidster, R. (2012). Bringing pronunciation instruction back into the classroom: An ESL teachers’ pronunciation “toolbox”. In. J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Sept. 2011 (pp. 93–108). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 391, 379–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Do, H., Hussein, H., Mixdorff, H., Jokisch, O., Ding, H., Gao, Q., Wei, S. and Hu, G. (2012). Evaluation of benefits from a computer-aided pronunciation training system for German learners of Mandarin Chinese. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2012 (pp. 362–365). Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
Durand, J., Gut, U., & Kristofferson, G. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of corpus phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eskenazi, M., (2013). The basics. In M. Eskenazi, G. -A. Levow, H. Meng, G. Parent, & D. Suendermann (Eds.), Crowdsourcing for speech processing: Applications to data collection, transcription and assessment (pp. 11–33). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foote, J. A., Holtby, A. K., & Derwing, T. M. (2011). Survey of the teaching of pronunciation in adult ESL programs in Canada, 2010. TESL Canada Journal, 29(1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foote, J., & Smith, G. (2013, September). Is there an app for that? Paper presented at the 5th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Ames, IA.
Fujisaki, H. & Hirose, K. (1984). Analysis of voice fundamental frequency contours for declarative sentences of Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 5(4), 233–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. (2015). From design to collection of learner corpora. In S. Grainger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 9–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (2016). Introduction: Learner corpus research – past, present and future. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 1–5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahn, L. D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahn, M. K. (2002). The persistence of learned primary phrase stress patterns among learners of English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Hardison, D. M. (2004). Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 34–52. Retrieved from <[URL]>
(2016, August). Visualizing the gestural and prosodic components of emphasis in multimodal discourse. Paper presented at the International Roundtable on The Role of Technology in L2 Pronunciation Research and Teaching, University of Calgary, Canada.
Hilbert, A., Mixdorff, H., Ding, H., Pfizinger, H., & Jokisch, O. (2010). Prosodic analysis of accented German by Russian and Chinese learners. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Hilbert, A., & Mixdorff, H. (2011). Weiterentwicklung eines Sprachsynthesesystems. In G. Görlitz (Ed.), Nachhaltige Forschung in Wachstumsbereichen Band I (pp. 35–42). Berlin: Logos Verlag.Google Scholar
Hu, W., Qian, Y., Soong, F. K., & Wang, Y. (2015). Improved mispronunciation detection with deep neural network trained acoustic models and transfer learning based logistic regression classifiers. Speech Communication, 671, 154–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hussein, H., Do, H. S., Mixdorff, H., Ding, H., Gao, Q., Hu, G., Wei, S., & Chao, Z. (2011). Mandarin tone perception and production by German learners. Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education (SLaTE), Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
Ingram, J., Mixdorff, H., & Kwon, N., (2009). Voice morphing and the manipulation of intra-speaker and cross-speaker phonetic variation to create foreign accent continua: A perceptual study. Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education (SLaTE), Wroxall Abbey, England.Google Scholar
Kipp, M. (2001). Anvil – A generic annotation tool for multimodal dialogue. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (pp. 1367–1370). Aalborg, Denmark: Eurospeech. Available at <[URL]>
(2014). ANVIL: A universal video research tool. In J. Durand, U. Gut, & G. Kristofferson (Eds.), Handbook of corpus phonology (pp. 420–436). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 345–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. (2007). Computer technology in teaching and researching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 271, 184–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, X., Deng, E., Liu, S., et al. (Eds.) (1981). Shíyòng Hànyŭ Kèbĕn Dì Yī Cè 实用汉语课本第一册 [Practical Chinese Reader, Book I] (pp. i–viii). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 961, 2076–2087. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logo.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logo. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Mixdorff, H., & Ingram, J. (2009). Prosodic analysis of foreign-accented English. Proceedings of Interspeech, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
Mixdorff, H., Külls, D., Hussein, H., Shu, G., Guoping, H., & Si, W. (2009). Towards a computer-aided pronunciation training system for German learners of Mandarin. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education (SLaTE), Wroxall Abbey, Warwickshire, UK.Google Scholar
Mixdorff, H., & Munro, M. J. (2013). Quantifying and evaluating the impact of prosodic differences of foreign-accented English. Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education (SLaTE). Grenoble, France.Google Scholar
Motohashi-Saigo, M., & Hardison, D. M. (2009). Acquisition of L2 Japanese geminates: Training with waveform displays. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 29–47. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2006). The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 341, 520–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Thomson, R. I. (2015). Setting segmental priorities for English learners: Evidence from a longitudinal study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53(1), 39–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J. (1997). Phonology courses offered by MATESOL programs in the US. TESOL Quarterly, 311, 741–764. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). The pedagogy-technology interface in computer assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 441–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neumeyer, L., Franco, H., Digalakis, V., & Weintraub, M. (2000). Automatic scoring of pronunciation quality. Speech Communication, 30(2), 83–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, M. G. (2011). Teaching and assessing pronunciation with computer technology. In N. Arnold & L. Ducate (Eds.), Present and Future Promises of CALL: From Theory and Research to New Directions in Language Teaching (2nd ed.) (pp. 375–406). San Marcos, TX: CALICO Monograph Series.Google Scholar
Okuno, T., & Hardison, D. M. (2016). Perception-production link in L2 Japanese vowel duration: Training with technology. Language Learning & Technology, 201, 61–80. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Olson, D. J. (2014). Benefits of visual feedback on segmental production in the L2 classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 173–192. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Pennington, M. C. (1999). Computer-aided pronunciation pedagogy: Promise, limitations, directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(5), 427–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennington, M. C., & Ellis, N. C. (2000). Cantonese speakers’ memory for English sentences with prosodic cues. The Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 372–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qian, M., Chukharev-Hudalainen, E., & Levis, J. (2018). A system for adaptive high-variability segmental-perceptual training: Implementation, effectiveness, and transfer. Language Learning and Technology, (221), 69–96.Google Scholar
Qian, X., Meng, H., Soong, F. (2012). The use of DBN-HMMs for mispronunciation detection and diagnosis in L2 English to support computer-aided pronunciation training. Proceedings of Interspeech 2012 (pp. 775–778), Portland, OR.Google Scholar
Rose, Y., & MacWhinney, B. (2014). The PhonBank project: Data and software-assisted methods for the study of phonology and phonological development. In J. Durand, U. Gut, & G. Kristoffersen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corpus phonology (pp. 308–401). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2011). Individual differences in the perception of final consonant voicing among native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 391, 115–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staples, S. (2015). Spoken corpora. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 271–291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik, H. (2012). ASR-based systems for language learning and therapy. International Symposium on Automatic Detection of Errors in Pronunciation Training (IS-Adept). KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, 6–8 June.Google Scholar
Strik, H., Colpaert, J., Van Doremalen, J., & Cucchiarini, C. (2012). The DISCO ASR-based CALL system: Practicing L2 oral skills and beyond. Proceedings of the Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), Istanbul, May.Google Scholar
Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2014). On automatic phonological transcription of speech corpora. In J. Durand, U. Gut, & G. Kristofferson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corpus phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik, H., Truong, K., de Wet, F., & Cucchiarini, C. (2009). Comparing different approaches for automatic pronunciation error detection. Speech Communication, 51(10), 845–852. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweet, H. (1900). The practical study of languages: A guide for teachers and learners. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. I. (2011). Computer assisted pronunciation training: Targeting second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 281, 744–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Does training to perceive L2 English vowels in one phonetic context transfer to other phonetic contexts? Proceedings of the annual conference of the Canadian Acoustics Association. Canadian Acoustics, 44(3), 198–199.Google Scholar
(2018). English Accent Coach [Computer program]. Version 2.3. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Is phonemic training using nonsense or real words more effective? In J. Levis, H. Le, I. Lucic, E. Simpson, & S. Vo (Eds.). Proceedings of the 7th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Oct. 2015. (pp. 88–97). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Trouvain, J., & Gut, U. (Eds.) (2007). Non-native prosody: Phonetic description and teaching practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Doremalen, J. (2014). Developing automatic speech recognition-enabled language learning applications: from theory to practice. Evaluating automatic speech recognition-based language learning systems: a case study (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Van Doremalen, J., Boves, L., Colpaert, J., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2016). Evaluating automatic speech recognition-based language learning systems: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 833–851. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Doremalen, J., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2010). Optimizing automatic speech recognition for low-proficient non-native speakers. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing 2009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Automatic pronunciation error detection in non-native speech: the case of vowel errors in Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1341, 1336–1347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, S. H. (2017). Speech Accent Archive. George Mason University. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Witt, S., & Young, S. (2000). Phone-level pronunciation scoring and assessment for interactive language learning. Speech Communication, 30(2/3): 95–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zielinski, B. (2008). The listener: No longer the silent partner in reduced intelligibility. System, 361, 69–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (33)

Cited by 33 other publications

Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim
2024. The Impact of Visual Corrective Feedback on Pronunciation Accuracy in L2 Sound Production. In Exploring Contemporary English Language Education Practices [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim
2024. EFL Learners' Perspectives on Online Pronunciation Instruction. In Teacher and Student Perspectives on Bilingual and Multilingual Education [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim & Hung Phu Bui
2024. EFL Learners’ Perceptions of Pronunciation Corrective Feedback: Insights from Synchronous High Variability Phonetic Training. In Innovations in Technologies for Language Teaching and Learning [Studies in Computational Intelligence, 1159], ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Yan
2024. The Application of Intelligent Speech Recognition in the Teaching of Spoken English in Colleges and Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Ali, Saandia, Marie Garnier & Linda Terrier
2023. Vers une cartographie systématique en diachronie de la recherche en prononciation de l’anglais L2. Anglophonia 36 DOI logo
Hirai, Akiyo & Angelina Kovalyova
2023. Using Speech-to-Text Applications for Assessing English Language Learners’ Pronunciation: A Comparison with Human Raters. In Optimizing Online English Language Learning and Teaching [English Language Education, 31], ► pp. 337 ff. DOI logo
Huang, Guanyu & Roger K. Moore
2023. Using social robots for language learning: are we there yet?. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning 3:1 ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Saito, Kazuya, Konstantinos Macmillan, Magdalena Kachlicka, Takuya Kunihara & Nobuaki Minematsu
2023. Automated assessment of second language comprehensibility: Review, training, validation, and generalization studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:1 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Weina
2023. The impact of automatic speech recognition technology on second language pronunciation and speaking skills of EFL learners: a mixed methods investigation. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Sweeting, Arizio M. & Michael D. Carey
2023. What pronunciation specialists believe CELTA tutors need to know to prepare student teachers to teach pronunciation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
Vančová, Hana
2023. AI and AI-powered tools for pronunciation training. Journal of Language and Cultural Education 11:3 ► pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
Chun, Dorothy M. & Yan Jiang
2022. Using Technology to Explore L2 Pronunciation. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Gómez-Lacabex, Esther, Francisco Gallardo-del-Puerto & Jian Gong
2022. Perception and production training effects on production of English lexical schwa by young Spanish learners. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 8:2 ► pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Quesada Vázquez, Leticia
2022. Synchronous computer-mediated communication in pronunciation teaching: A survey study. Revista de Estilos de Aprendizaje 15:Especial ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Rehman, Ivana, Alif Silpachai, John Levis, Guanlong Zhao & Ricardo Gutierrez-Osuna
2022. The English pronunciation of Arabic speakers: A data-driven approach to segmental error identification. Language Teaching Research 26:6 ► pp. 1055 ff. DOI logo
Trouvain, Jürgen
2022. Das IFCASL-Korpus als phonetisches Lernerkorpus. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 50:1 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Zhu, Shan & Sheng Bin
2022. Application of Ontology Matching Algorithm Based on Linguistic Features in English Pronunciation Quality Evaluation. Occupational Therapy International 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
O’Brien, Mary Grantham
2021. Ease and Difficulty in L2 Pronunciation Teaching: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Communication 5 DOI logo
Papin, Kevin
2021. « Avez-vous la carte de points? » : soutenir la volonté de communiquer à l’oral grâce à des tâches de simulation en ligne. La Revue de l’AQEFLS: Revue de l’Association québécoise des enseignants de français langue seconde 34:2 DOI logo
Setter, Jane & Takehiko Makino
2021. Pronunciation Teaching. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonetics, ► pp. 527 ff. DOI logo
Walesiak, Beata
2021. Chapter 15. Mobile apps for pronunciation training. In English Pronunciation Instruction [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 19], ► pp. 358 ff. DOI logo
Bahi, Halima & Khaled Necibi
2020. Fuzzy Logic Applied for Pronunciation Assessment. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 10:1 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Dendani, Bilal, Halima Bahi & Toufik Sari
2020. Speech Enhancement Based on Deep AutoEncoder for Remote Arabic Speech Recognition. In Image and Signal Processing [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12119], ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Tejedor-Garcia, Cristian, David Escudero-Mancebo, Valentin Cardenoso-Payo & Cesar Gonzalez-Ferreras
2020. Using Challenges to Enhance a Learning Game for Pronunciation Training of English as a Second Language. IEEE Access 8 ► pp. 74250 ff. DOI logo
Derwing, Tracey M. & Ronald I. Thomson
2019. Reflections on the Development of L2 Pronunciation Research in Canada. The Canadian Modern Language Review 75:4 ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Hardison, Debra M.
2019. Technology-Based Communication Success for Second-Language Learners. In Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hardison, Debra M.
2020. Technology-Based Communication Success for Second-Language Learners. In Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hardison, Debra M.
2021. Multimodal input in second-language speech processing. Language Teaching 54:2 ► pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Henrichsen, Lynn
2019. Teaching and Learning Second-Language Pronunciation Using Online Resources. In Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Henrichsen, Lynn
2020. Teaching and Learning Second-Language Pronunciation Using Online Resources. In Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tsai, Pi-hua
2019. Beyond self-directed computer-assisted pronunciation learning: a qualitative investigation of a collaborative approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning 32:7 ► pp. 713 ff. DOI logo
Yarra, Chiranjeevi, Aparna Srinivasan, Chandana Srinivasa, Ritu Aggarwal & Prasanta Kumar Ghosh
2019. 2019 22nd Conference of the Oriental COCOSDA International Committee for the Co-ordination and Standardisation of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques (O-COCOSDA), ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2018. Plenary talk. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 4:2 ► pp. 260 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.