Article published in:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 5:1 (2019) ► pp. 4971


Ammar, A., & Spada, N.
(2006) One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 543–574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L.
(2006) The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(05), 920–948. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L.
(2007) The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(4), 273–281.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. E.
(2001) Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S., & Swain, M.
(1993) Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(3), 357–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, C., & Seidlhofer, B.
(1994) Pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(2003) Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
(2005) Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I.
(2007) A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 359–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G.
(1997) Pronunciation instruction for fossilized learners: Can it help? Applied Language Learning, 8(1), 185–203.Google Scholar
(1998) Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dlaska, A., & Krekeler, C.
(2013) The short-term effects of individual corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation. System, 41(1), 25–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R.
(2006) Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(02), 339–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Field, J.
(2005) Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Liu, S.
(2001) The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 527–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, L. D.
(2004) Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H.
(2007) The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Havranek, G.
(2002) When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed? International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 255–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, J. M.
(1978) Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 62(8), 387–398.Google Scholar
Horwitz, E. K.
(1999) Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27(4), 557–576. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J.
(2004) Research in teaching pronunciation and intonation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 241, 109–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kang, O.
(2010) Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Pickering, L.
(2010) Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. The Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 554–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S., & Terrell, T.
(1983) The natural approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Alemany Press, Regents/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C.
(1988) Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A. H., & Lyster, R.
(2015) The effects of corrective feedback on instructed L2 speech perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lesley, T., Sandy, C., Hansen, C., & Zukowski, J.
(2005) Interchange Passages placement evaluation package (3rd edition). New York City, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levis, J. M.
(2002) Reconsidering low-rising intonation in American English. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 56–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, S.
(2010) The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Oral corrective feedback. ELT journal, 68(2), 196–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Zhu, Y., & Ellis, R.
(2016) The effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic structure. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 276–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lochtman, K.
(2002) Oral corrective feedback in the foreign language classroom: How it affects interaction in analytic foreign language teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 271–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M.
(1983) Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Problems in SLA: Second language acquisition research series. Lawrence Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
The Longman dictionary of contemporary English
(5th ed.) (2009) New York, NY: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Lyster, R.
(2004) Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 399–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L.
(1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Saito, K.
(2010) Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M.
(2013) Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(01), 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J.
(2007) Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in SLA: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 408–452). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Philp, J.
(1998) Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakata, T.
(2014) Effects of feedback timing on second language vocabulary learning: Does delaying feedback increase learning? Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 416–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, L.
(2001) The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 233–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Current research on intelligibility in English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 261, 219–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. C., & Sandy, C.
(2008) Passages: Students’ book 1 (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, J., & Spada, N.
(2006) The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega, Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching, (pp. 133–164). Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Saito, K.
(2013) Reexamining effects of form-focused instruction on L2 pronunciation development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., & Lyster, R.
(2012) Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(1993) Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 131, 206–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, R. A.
(1996) Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 343–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y.
(2006) Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 361–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M.
(2008) Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly, 42(2), 181–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W.
(2006) Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waniek-Klimczak, E.
(2015) Factors affecting word stress recognition by advanced Polish learners of English. In E. Waniek-Klimczak & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Teaching and researching the pronunciation of English (pp. 139–151). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Willis, D., & Willis, J.
(2008) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press: London, the UK.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y.
(2012) The relative effects of explicit correction and recasts on two target structures via two communication modes. Language Learning, 62(4), 1134–1169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Levis, John M.
2019. Teaching-oriented research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 5:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Martin, Ines A. & Lieselotte Sippel
2021. Is giving better than receiving?. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 7:1  pp. 62 ff. Crossref logo
Sippel, Lieselotte & Ines A. Martin
2022. Immediate and long-term improvement in lexical stress perception: the role of teacher and peer feedback. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.