Article published in:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 5:2 (2019) ► pp. 294323
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Dalman, Mohammadreza & Okim Kang
2021. VALIDITY EVIDENCE: UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF TOEFL IBT HIGH SCORE SPOKEN RESPONSES. International Journal of Listening  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Huensch, Amanda & Charlie Nagle
2021. The Effect of Speaker Proficiency on Intelligibility, Comprehensibility, and Accentedness in L2 Spanish: A Conceptual Replication and Extension of Munro and Derwing (1995a). Language Learning 71:3  pp. 626 ff. Crossref logo
Kobayashi, Aozora, Ian Wilson & D. Roy
2020. Using deep learning to classify English native pronunciation level from acoustic information. SHS Web of Conferences 77  pp. 02004 ff. Crossref logo
Nagle, Charles L.
2021. Assessing the state of the art in longitudinal L2 pronunciation research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 7:2  pp. 154 ff. Crossref logo
Nagle, Charles L. & Amanda Huensch
2020. Expanding the scope of L2 intelligibility research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 6:3  pp. 329 ff. Crossref logo
Nagle, Charles L. & Ivana Rehman
2021. DOING L2 SPEECH RESEARCH ONLINE: WHY AND HOW TO COLLECT ONLINE RATINGS DATA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:4  pp. 916 ff. Crossref logo
Saito, Kazuya, Yui Suzukida, Mai Tran & Adam Tierney
2021. Domain‐General Auditory Processing Partially Explains Second Language Speech Learning in Classroom Settings: A Review and Generalization Study. Language Learning 71:3  pp. 669 ff. Crossref logo
Tsunemoto, Aki, Pavel Trofimovich, Josée Blanchet, Juliane Bertrand & Sara Kennedy
2021. Effects of benchmarking and peer‐assessment on French learners' self‐assessments of accentedness, comprehensibility, and fluency. Foreign Language Annals Crossref logo
Tsunemoto, Aki, Pavel Trofimovich & Sara Kennedy
2020. Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about second language pronunciation teaching, their experience, and speech assessments. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882093727 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Akiyama, Y., & Saito, K.
(2017) Development of comprehensibility and its linguistic correlates: A longitudinal study of video-mediated telecollaboration. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 585–609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergeron, A., & Trofimovich, P.
(2017) Linguistic dimensions of accentedness and comprehensibility: Exploring task and listener effects in second language French. Foreign Language Annals, 50(3), 547–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D.
(2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K.
(2015) Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T.
(2018) Linguistic dimensions of L2 accentedness and comprehensibility vary across speaking tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 443–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
(2013) The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckes, T.
(2005) Examining rater effects in TestDaF writing and speaking performance assessments: A many-facet Rasch analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(3), 197–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Introduction to many-facet Rasch measurement. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Eskénazi, M., Levow, G.-A., Meng, H., Parent, G., & Suendermann, D.
(Eds.) (2013) Crowdsourcing for speech processing: Applications to data collection, transcription and assessment. UK: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evanini, K., Higgins, D., & Zechner, K.
(2010) Using Amazon Mechanical Turk for transcription of non-native speech. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, Los Angeles, CA.
Flege, J. E., & Fletcher, K. L.
(1992) Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(1), 370–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fort, K., Adda, G., & Bretonnel Cohen, K.
(2011) Amazon Mechanical Turk: Gold mine or coal mine? Computational Linguistics, 37(2), 413–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelas, H., Teferra Abate, S., Besacier, L., & Pellegrino, F.
(2011) Quality assessment of crowdsourcing transcriptions for African languages Interspeech-2011 (pp. 3065–3068).Google Scholar
Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A.
(2013) Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hallgren, K. A.
(2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, T., & Thomson, R. I.
(2013) Rater experience, rating scale length, and judgments of L2 pronunciation: Revisiting research conventions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(2), 135–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, S., Foote, J. A., & Dos Santos Buss, L. K.
(2015) Second language speakers at university: Longitudinal development and rater behaviour. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 199–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kunath, S. A., & Weinberger, S. H.
(2010) The wisdom of the crowd’s ear: Speech accent rating and annotation with Amazon Mechanical Turk Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (pp. 168–171). Los Angeles, CA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Linacre, J. M.
(2002) What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(2), 878.Google Scholar
Martin, D., Hanrahan, B. V., O’Neill, J., & Gupta, N.
(2014) Being a turker. Paper presented at the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, Baltimore, MD. Crossref
McAllister Byun, T., Halpin, P. F., & Szeredi, D.
(2015) Online crowdsourcing for efficient rating of speech: A validation study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 53, 70–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P.
(1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C.
(Ed.) (2006) Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
(1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myford, C. M., & Wolfe, E. W.
(2003) Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part 1. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4(4), 386–422.Google Scholar
Nagle, C.
(2018a) Modeling classroom language learners’ comprehensibility and accentedness over time: The case of L2 Spanish. In J. Levis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 17–29). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
(2018b) Motivation, comprehensibility, and accentedness in L2 Spanish: Investigating motivation as a time-varying predictor of pronunciation development. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 199–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, M. G.
(2014) L2 learners’ assessments of accentedness, fluency, and comprehensibility of native and nonnative German speech. Language Learning, 64(4), 715–748. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Methodological choices in rating speech samples. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 587–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J.
(2014) Inside the Turk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G.
(2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419.Google Scholar
Pavlick, E., Post, M., Irvine, A., Kachaev, D., & Callison-Burch, C.
(2014) The language demographics of Amazon Mechanical Turk. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 79–92). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peabody, M. A.
(2011) Methods for pronunciation assessment in computer aided language learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Peer, E., Vosgerau, J., & Acquisti, A.
(2014) Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavioral Research Methods, 46(4), 1023–1031. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J., Irani, L., Silberman, M. S., Zaldivar, A., & Tomlinson, B.
(2010) Who are the crowdworkers? Shifting demographics in mechanical turk. Paper presented at the CHI ’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA.
Saito, K., Dewaele, J.-M., Abe, M., & In’nami, Y.
(2018) Motivation, emotion, learning experience, and second language comprehensibility development in classroom settings: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Language Learning, 68(3), 709–743. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
(2017) Using listener judgments to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 439–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L.
(1979) Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
(2012) Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 905–916. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Qian, X., & Meng, H.
(2013) Predicting gradation of L2 English mispronunciations using crowdsourced ratings and phonological rules. In P. Badin, T. Hueber, G. Bailly, D. Demolin, & F. Raby (Eds.), Proceedings of Speech and Language Technology in Education (SLaTE 2013) (pp. 127–131). Grenoble, France.Google Scholar
Wu, M., & Adams, R. J.
(2013) Properties of Rasch residual fit statistics. Journal of Applied Measurement, 14, 339–355.Google Scholar