Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 7:3 (2021) ► pp.370–407

Perception of American English consonants /v/ and /w/ by Hindi speakers of English

ORCID logo | New York Medical College
| The Graduate Center, CUNY
| Haskins Laboratories | University of Georgia
| The Graduate Center, CUNY | Haskins Laboratories | Yale University
| Teachers College, Columbia University
This study examined perception of the American English (AE) /v/-/w/ consonant contrast by Hindi speakers of English as a second language (L2). A second aim was to determine whether residence in the US modulated perception of this difficult contrast for proficient bilingual Hindi-English listeners. Two groups of Hindi-English bilinguals (the first resided in the US for more than five years, the second lived in India) and a group of AE-speaking listeners participated in the study. Listeners’ identification and discrimination of nonsense words (e.g., “vagag” vs. “wagag”) were examined. Hindi listeners performed significantly less accurately than AE controls. Accuracy by Hindi listeners was near chance for identification and higher-than-chance for discrimination. Exposure to AE in the US did not improve performance. These results are consistent with previous studies of late L2 learners and extend findings to a population that was proficient in an L2 before arriving in the L2 environment.
Keywords: speech perception, Hindi, Bilingualism, length of residence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Status of /v/ and /w/ in English versus Hindi
    • 1.2Bilingual experience
    • 1.3Automatic Selective Perception Model
    • 1.4The current study
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Stimulus materials
    • 2.3Procedure
      • 2.3.1Task 1-identification
      • 2.3.2Task 2-categorial AXB discrimination
    • 2.4Data analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Identification task: Control consonants
    • 3.2Identification task: Experimental contrast
      • 3.2.1Accuracy
    • 3.3AXB categorial task: Control pairs
    • 3.4AXB categorial task: Experimental pair
      • 3.4.1Accuracy
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Perception patterns for /v/ and /w/
    • 4.2Models of second-language learning
    • 4.3Second language experience
    • 4.4Phonemic context effects
    • 4.5Limitations and future directions
    • 4.6Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 11 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20033.gro
References (58)
References
Abbasi, A. M., Pathan, H., & Channa, M. A. (2018). Experimental phonetics and phonology in Indo-Aryan & European languages. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 6(3), 21–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, K. S. (1988). English and India’s three-language formula: An empirical perspective. World Englishes, 7(3), 289–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alam, F., Habib, S. M., & Khan, M. (2008). Acoustic analysis of Bangla consonants. Spoken Languages Technologies for Under-resourced Languages (SLTU-2008), 108–113. Retrieved from [URL]
Baigorri, M., Campanelli, L., & Levy, E. S. (2018). Perception of American English vowels by early and late Spanish-English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 62(4), 681–700. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realistic view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross language research (pp. 171–204). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Second Language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp.13–34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1962). Forms of English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R. (2008). Training non-native language sound patterns: lessons from training Japanese adults on English /ɹ/-/l/ contrast. In J. G. H. Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology of second language acquisition (pp. 287–308). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, V. A., Hedayati, M., Zanger, A., Mayn, S., Ray, L., Dillman-Hasso, N., & Strand, J. F. (2018). What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect? PLOS ONE, 13(11), e0207160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, S., Hoffman, T., Huber, M., & Kautzsch, A. (Eds.). (2014). The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Census of India. (2011). Comparative Speaker’s strength of Scheduled Languages. Retrieved from [URL]
Chand, V. (2009). [V]at is going on? Local and global ideologies about Indian English. Language in Society, 381, 393–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Who Owns English? Political, Social and Linguistic Dimensions of Urban Indian English Language Practices (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
Datta, H., Hestvik, A., Vidal, N., Tessel, C., Hisagi, M., Wróblewski, M., & Shafer, V. L. (2020). Automaticity of speech processing in early bilingual adults and children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(2), 429–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1991). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(1), 395–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and language experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1987). Cross-Language Switching in Stop Consonant perception and Production by Dutch Speakers of English. Speech Communication, 6(3), 185–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Fletcher, K. L. (1992). Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 91(1), 370–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedorenko, E., Gibson, E., & Rohde, D. (2007). The nature of working memory in linguistic, arithmetic and spatial integration processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 246–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, R. (2019). Almost [w]anishing: The elusive /v/-/w/ contrast in Educated Indian English. In Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 1382–1386). Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
(2016). Speech rhythm in varieties of English: Evidence from educated Indian English and British English. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hisagi, M., Shafer, V. L., Strange, W., & Sussman, E. S. (2010). Perception of a Japanese Vowel length contrast by Japanese and American English listeners: behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Brain Research, 13601, 89–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hisagi, M., & Strange, W. (2011). Perception of Japanese temporally-cued contrasts by American English listeners. Language and speech, 541, 241–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hisagi, M., Tajima, K., & Kato, H. (2014). The effect of language experience on the ability of non-native listeners to identify Japanese phonemic length contrasts. Proceedings of Meetings of Acoustics, 211, 060003; DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hisagi, M., Garrido-Nag, K., Datta, H., & Shafer, V. L. (2015). ERP indices of vowel processing in Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 18(2), 271–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurks, P. P. M., Vles, J. S. H., Hendriksen, J. G. M., Kalff, A. C., Feron, F. J. M., Kroes, M., … Jolles, J. (2006). Semantic category fluency versus initial letter fluency over 60 seconds as a measure of automatic and controlled processing in healthy school-aged children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(5), 684–695. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, P., Ekanayake, D., Hamann, S., Sennema, A., & Evans, B. G. (2008). Category and perceptual interference in second-language phoneme learning: An examination of English /w/-/v/ learning by Sinhala, German, and Dutch speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1305–1316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, P., Wagner, A., Pinet, M., & Rosen, S. (2011). Cross-language specialization in phonetic processing: English and Hindi perception of /w/-/v/ speech and nonspeech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(5), 297–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenth, R., Love, J., & Herve, M. (2018). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (Version 1.1). Retrieved from [URL]
Levy, E. S. (2009). Language experience and consonantal context effects on perceptual assimilation of French vowels by American-English learners of French. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(2), 1138–1152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, E. S., & Strange, W. (2008). Perception of French vowels by American English adults with and without French language experience. Journal of Phonetics, 36(1), 141–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., Yang, L. X., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2010). A working memory test battery for MATLAB. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 571–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2004). Effects of the age of second language learning on the duration of first and second language sentences: The role of suppression. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(3), 373–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massaro, D. W. (1974). Perceptual units in speech recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102(2), 199–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Melchers, G., Shaw, P., & Sundkvist, P. (2019). World Englishes (3rd ed.). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(12), 2544–2590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2006). A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(4), 601–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, M. (1999). Hindi. In Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet (pp. 100–103). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J., & Nair, R. (1996). Implications of Hindi prosodic structure. In J. Durand & B. Laks (Eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods (pp. 549–584). Salford, UK: University of Salford Press.Google Scholar
Piller, B., & Skillings, M. J. (2005). English language teaching strategies used by primary teachers in one New Delhi, India School. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 9(3). Retrieved from [URL]
Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime 2.0.10.248]. (2015). Retrieved from [URL]
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.4.3). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]
Sahgal, A., & Agnihotri, R. (1988). Indian English phonology: A sociolinguistic perspective. English World-Wide, 9(1), 51–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sahgal, A. (1991). Patterns of language use in a bilingual setting in India. In J. Cheshire (Ed.), English around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives (pp. 299–307). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E. W. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebastian-Galles, N., & Diaz, Begoña. (2012). First and second language speech perception: Graded learning. Language Learning, 62(2), 131–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, M. (2006). Institutionalization of English in India-A Historical Background. South Asian Review, 27(2), 175–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smiljanić, R., & Bradlow, A. R. (2005). Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 118(3), 1677–1688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Temporal organization of English clear and plain speech. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 124(5), 3171–3182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strange, W. (2011). Automatic selective perception (ASP) of first and second language speech: A working model. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 456–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
United States Census Bureau. (2015). Detailed languages spoken at home and ability to speak English for the population 5 years and over for United States: 2009–2013. [Data File]. Retrieved from [URL]
Werker, J. F., & Logan, J. S. (1985). Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 37(1), 35–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitney, W. D. (1896). Sanskrit grammar. Boston, MA: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Antony, Reethee, Brett Martin, Valerie Shafer & Susan Behrens
2024. Perception of Voicing and Aspiration in Hindi, American English, and Tamil Listeners in Quiet and in Background Noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 67:7 ► pp. 2367 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.