Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 8:1 (2022) ► pp.116–143

The longitudinal impact of self-reflection and integrated pronunciation instruction on L2 French learners’ production of /y/ and /u/

ORCID logo | Bentley University
Although pronunciation can be fostered through explicit instruction, instructors need practical strategies to support their learners’ pronunciation (Darcy, 2018; Derwing, 2018; Derwing & Munro, 2015; Levis, 2018). Additionally, “researching longitudinal development of L2 learners [pronunciation] is essential to understanding influences in their success” (Derwing & Munro, 2013, p.163). This three-semester-long experimental quantitative study on 72 French learners examined whether self-reflection (open-ended questionnaires) as a learning strategy could complement integrated explicit pronunciation instruction and support the development of intelligible production of the two contrastive vowels /y/ and /u/. Results on pre/post read-aloud tests surrounding pronunciation lessons were compared between a treatment (instruction + self-reflection), a comparison (instruction only) and a control group (neither instruction, nor self-reflection), and within each group to determine if there was significant growth over time. Findings revealed that self-reflection combined with explicit instruction led to better learning outcomes and production gains when compared to oral natural input.
Keywords: self-reflection, L2 French, pronunciation, intelligibility, longitudinal research
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Pronunciation teaching and learning
    • 2.2Self-reflection and intelligibility
    • 2.3/y/ and /u/ for intelligibility
    • 2.4Longitudinal research
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Instructional setting and recruitment
    • 3.3Materials and data collection procedure
      • 3.3.1Read-aloud tasks
      • 3.3.2Self-reflection questionnaires
    • 3.4Data analysis
      • 3.4.1Research question 1 – data analysis
      • 3.4.2Research question 2 – data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Production outcomes
    • 4.2Production growth
      • 4.2.1Production growth on /y/
      • 4.2.2Production growth on /u/
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Production learning outcomes
    • 5.2Production growth
      • 5.2.1Within each semester
      • 5.2.2Longitudinal production growth
    • 5.3Limitations and future research
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 24 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.21022.mer
References (59)
References
Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20 (3), 305–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creative Commons. (n.d.). French vowel chart [image]. [URL]. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from [URL]
Darcy, I. (2018). Powerful and effective pronunciation instruction: how can we achieve it? The CATESOL Journal, 30 (1), 13–45.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M. (2018). The role of phonological awareness in language learning. In P. Garrett & J. M. Cots (Eds.), The routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 1–20). Routledge.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2013). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-Year study. Language Learning, 63 (2), 163–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Thomson, R. I., Foote, J. A., & Munro, M. J. (2012). A longitudinal study of listening perception in adult learners of English: Implications for teachers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68 (3), 247–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saint Léger, D. (2009). Self-assessment of speaking skills and participation in a foreign language class. Foreign Language Annals, 42 (1), 158–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, W. B. (2015). Using orthography to teach pronunciation. In M. Reed & J. M. Levis (Eds.), The Handbook of English Pronunciation (pp. 488–504). Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, O. J. (1964). Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6 (3), 241–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egi, T. (2008). Investigating stimulated recall as a cognitive measure: Reactivity and verbal reports in SLA research methodology. Language Awareness, 17(4), 212–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36 (2), 345–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15 (1), 47–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). York Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glover, P. (2011). Using CEFR level descriptors to raise university students’ awareness of their speaking skills. Language Awareness, 20 (2), 121–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J. & Darcy, I. (2016). The development of comprehensible speech in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, (2)11, 56–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harklau, L. (2008). Developing qualitative longitudinal case studies of advanced language learners. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities (pp. 23–35). Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoyt-Oukada, K. (2003). Considering students’ need and interests in curriculum construction. The French Review, 76 (4), 721–737. [URL]
Huensch, A. (2019). Pronunciation in foreign language classrooms: Instructors’ training, classroom practices, and beliefs. Language Teaching Research, 23 (6), 745–764. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huensch, A., & Thompson, A. S. (2017). Contextualizing Attitudes Toward Pronunciation: Foreign Language Learners in the United States. Foreign Language Annals, 50 (2), 410–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Exploring the relationship between explicit instruction, pronunciation awareness, and the development of L2 French connected speech process. Language Awareness, 1–19, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2010). Language awareness and second language pronunciation: A classroom study. Language Awareness, 19(3), 171–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, S., Blanchet, J., & Trofimovich, P. (2014). Learner pronunciation, awareness, and instruction in French as a second language. Foreign Language Annals, 47 (1), 79–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kocjančič Antolík, T., Pillot-Loiseau, C., & Kamiyama, T. (2019). The effectiveness of real-time ultrasound visual feedback on tongue movements in L2 pronunciation training: Japanese learners’ progress on the French vowel contrast/y/-/u. Journal of second language pronunciation, 5 (1), 72–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15 (2), 155–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristo de Souza, H. (2017). Brazilian EFL learners’ awareness about L2 phones: Is MALL pronunced as ‘MAL’? Trabalhos Em Linguística Aplicada, 56 (1), 235–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lappin-Fortin, K., & Rye, B. J. (2014). The use of pre-/posttest and self-assessment tools in a French pronunciation course. Foreign Language Annals, 47 (2), 300–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. (2016). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R (Second Edition). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lennon, P. (1989). Introspection and intentionality in advanced second language acquisition. Language Learning, 39(3), 375–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M. (2018). Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, E. S., & Law, F. F. (2010). Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: Language experience, consonantal context, and the perception-production relationship. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128 (3), 1290–1305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, E. S., & Strange, W. (2008). Perception of French vowels by American English adults with and without French language experience. Journal of Phonetics, 36 (1), 141–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lodge, K. (2009). Fundamental concepts in phonology. Sameness and difference. Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, I. (2020a). Pronunciation development and instruction in distance language learning. Language, Learning & Technology, 24 (1), 86–106. 10125/44711Google Scholar
(2020b). Pronunciation can be acquired outside the classroom: Design and assessment of homework-based training. The Modern Language Journal, 104 (2), 457–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meritan, C. (2020). The impact of self-reflection and integrated pronunciation instruction on the intelligibility of Generation Z learners of French: A mixed methods study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Meritan, C., & Mroz, A. (2019). Impact of self-reflection and awareness-raising on novice French learners’ pronunciation. Foreign Language Annals, 52(4), 798–821. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. S. (2012). Teaching French pronunciation with phonetics in a college-level beginner French course. NECTFL Review, 69 1, 47–68.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58 (3), 479–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Thomson, R. I. (2015). Setting segmental priorities for English learners: Evidence from a longitudinal study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53 (1), 39–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 (3), 516–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawlak, M. (2010). Designing and piloting a tool for the measurement of the use of pronunciation learning strategies. Research in Language, 8 (0), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. (Ed.). (2015). Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramírez Verdugo, D. (2006). A Study of intonation awareness and learning in non-native speakers of English. Language Awareness, 15 (3), 141–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ranta, L. & Lyster, L. (2018). Form-focused instruction. In P. Garrett & J. M. Cots (Eds.), The routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 40–56). Routledge.Google Scholar
Raoofi, S., Heng Chan, S., Mukundan, J., & Md Rashid, S. (2013). Metacognition and second/foreign language learning. English Language Teaching, 7 (1), 36–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruellot, V. (2006). French pronunciation learning and computer-mediated visual feedback. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. DAI-A 67/07, p. 2556, Jan 2007, 3223704
(2011). Computer-assisted pronunciation learning of French /u/ and /y/ at the intermediate level. Proceedings of the 2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, 199–213.Google Scholar
Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69(3), 652–708. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sicola, L., & Darcy, I. (2015). Integrating Pronunciation into the Language Classroom. In M. Reed & J. M. Levis (Eds.), The Handbook of English Pronunciation (1st ed., pp. 471–487). Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sturm, J. L. (2019). Current approaches to pronunciation instruction: A longitudinal case study in French. Foreign Language Annals, 52 (1), 32–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R. (2017). Measurement of accentedness, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. In O. Kang & A. Ginther (Eds.), Assessment in Second Language Pronunciation (1st ed., pp. 11–29). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36 (3), 326–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sport Sciences, 1 (21), 19–25. ISSN 2299-9590Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Kennedy, S., & Blanchet, J. (2017). Development of second language French oral skills in an instructed setting: A focus on speech ratings. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20 (2), 32–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zielinski, B., & Yates, L. (2014). Pronunciation instruction is not appropriate for beginning-level learners. In L. Grant (Ed.), Pronunciation myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching (pp. 56–79). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar