Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 9:1 (2023) ► pp.2046
References
Adams, R., Nuevo, A. M., & Egi, T.
(2011) Explicit and implicit feedback, modified output and SLA. Does explicit and implicit feedback promote learning and learner-learner interactions? The Modern Language Journal, 95 1, 42–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albert, R., & Marx, N.
(2014) Empirisches Arbeiten in Linguistik und Sprachlehrforschung. Anleitung zu quantitativen Studien von der Planungsphase bis zum Fortschritt [Empirical methods in linguistics and second language acquisition: Recommendations for quantatitive research from beginning to end]. Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(2019) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.05. Accessed 22 July 2018 from [URL]
Darcy, I.
(2018) Powerful and effective pronunciation instruction: How can we achieve it? The CATESOL Journal, 30 1, 13–45.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M.
(2013) Pronunciation instruction. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 1–9). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
Dooley, L. M., & Bamford, N. J.
(2018) Peer feedback on collaborative learning activities in veterinary education. Veterinary Sciences, 5 1, 90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujii, A., Ziegler, N., & Mackey, A.
(2016) Peer interaction and metacognitive instruction in the EFL classroom. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 63–89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, C.
(2003) Modern German pronunciation: An introduction for speakers of English. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, N., Jackson, C. N., & DiMidio, J.
(2017) The role of prosody and explicit instruction in processing instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 101 1, 294–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J.
(2019) The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44 1, 863–880. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J.
(2016) A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R. (2nd ed.). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2017) Moving beyond the bar plot and the line graph to create informative and attractive graphics. The Modern Language Journal, 101 1, 244–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L.
(2015) The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36 1, 345–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenhard, W. & Lenhard, A.
(2016) Calculation of Effect Sizes. Retrieved from: [URL]
Lerchenfeldt, S., Mi, M., & Eng, M.
(2019) The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMC medical education, 19 1, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J.
(2020) Revisiting the Intelligibility and Nativeness Principles. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6 1, 310–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M.
(2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39 1, 369–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lira-Gonzales, M. L., & Nassaji, H.
(2019) The provision and efficacy of peer feedback in blogs versus paper-based writing. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 170 1, 228–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W.
(2009) To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18 1, 30–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mantesso, J., Petrucka, P., & Bassendowski, S.
(2008) Continuing professional competence: peer feedback success from determination of nurse locus of control. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 39 1, 200–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, I. A.
(2020a) Pronunciation can be acquired outside the classroom: Design and assessment of homework-based training. The Modern Language Journal, 104 1, 457–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020b) Pronunciation development and instruction in distance language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 24 1, 86–106.Google Scholar
(2022) “Giving is better than receiving: Teaching pronunciation with peer feedback.” In J. Levis & A. Guskaroska (Eds.). Proceedings of the 12th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, I. A., & Sippel, L.
(2021a) Is giving better than receiving? The effects of peer and teacher feedback on L2 pronunciation skills. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 71, 62–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021b) Providing vs. receiving peer feedback: Learners’ beliefs and experiences. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022) “Do beliefs matter? The relationship between beliefs about peer feedback and peer feedback outcomes on pronunciation.” Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moranski, K., & Ziegler, N.
(2019, March). Multi-site studies in SLA research: Challenges, risks, and rewards. Paper presented at the conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Atlanta, GA.
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
(2020) Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility, redux. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6 1, 283–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C. L.
(2021) Assessing the state of the art in longitudinal L2 pronunciation research: Trends and future directions. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 7 1, 154–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C. L., & Huensch, A.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 1, 417–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G.
(2005) Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25 1, 26–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, J. W.
(2019) PsychoPy. Psychology software in Python [Computer program]. Version 3.1.2. Accessed 12 May 2019 at [URL]
Philip, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N.
(2014) Peer interaction and second language learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L.
(2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64 1, 878–912. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., Egbert, J., & Larsson, T.
(2020) Research design and sampling. Presentation given at the Workshop on Quantitative Linguistics Methods. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Rouhi, A. & Azizian, E.
(2013) Peer review: Is giving corrective feedback better than receiving it in L2 writing? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93 1, 1349–1354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., & Plonsky, L.
(2019) Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69 1, 652–708. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sakai, M., & Moorman, C.
(2018) Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39 1, 187–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, M.
(2013) Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97 1, 611–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Oral peer corrective feedback. Multiple theoretical perspectives. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 19–34). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, M., & Loewen, S.
(2018) Metacognitive instruction enhances the effectiveness of corrective feedback: Variable effects of feedback types and linguistic targets. Language Learning, 68 1, 507–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, M., & Lyster, R.
(2012) Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34 1, 591–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sippel, L.
(2019) The impact of peer corrective feedback on vocabulary development. Foreign Language Annals, 52 1, 595–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) German learners’ beliefs about peer interaction and peer feedback. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 53 1, 175–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) Maximizing the benefits of peer interaction: Form-focused instruction and peer feedback training. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sippel, L., & Jackson, C. N.
(2015) Teacher vs. peer oral corrective feedback in the German language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 481, 688–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sippel, L., & Martin, I. A.
(2022) Immediate and long-term improvement in lexical stress perception: the role of teacher and peer feedback. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Nagle, C. L., O’Brien, M. G., Kennedy, S., Reid, K. T., & Strachan, L.
(2020) Second language comprehensibility as a dynamic construct. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6 1, 430–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z.
(2006) A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15 1, 179–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, R.
(2008) Learners’ perception of corrective feedback in pair work. Foreign Language Annals, 41 1, 525–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar