Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation: Online-First Articles

The influence of linguistic and cognitive background on word stress processing in an unknown language

ORCID logo | University of Fribourg | University of Bern
| University of Fribourg
| University of Fribourg | Gymnasium Interlaken
| University of Fribourg
| University of Fribourg | Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
| University of Fribourg
| University of Fribourg
Individual differences in working memory and musical aptitude, as well as task complexity are crucial in predicting the performance of word stress perception in a second language (L2). The present study investigated the interactive effects of these factors with the listeners’ first language. French and German listeners, both without knowledge of Spanish, performed stress-related tasks in Spanish, as well as musical and working memory tests in their L1. Besides confirming the impact of L1, our findings better define the influence of working memory and musical aptitude on L2 stress perception by specifically tapping into the central executive component of working memory, objectively assessing musical aptitude, and considering task complexity as a moderating factor in the relationship between the inter-individual factors and L2 stress perception. Our findings are also the first to demonstrate task-specific performance differences between French and German listeners, possibly reflecting differential cognitive and perceptual mechanisms depending on L1.
Keywords: lexical stress perception, unknown language, working memory capacity, musical aptitude, task complexity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1First language (L1)
    • 1.2Working memory
    • 1.3Musical aptitude
    • 1.4The present study
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Working memory capacity
    • 2.3Musical aptitude
    • 2.4Stress-related tasks
      • 2.4.1Identification
        • Material
        • Acoustic description and perceptual evaluation of the stimuli
        • Procedure
      • 2.4.2Odd-One-Out
        • Material and design
        • Acoustic description and perceptual evaluation of the stimuli
        • Procedure
    • 2.5Data analysis
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Data availability
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 June 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.23028.sch
References (67)
References
Alexander, J. A., Wong, P. C., & Bradlow, A. R. (2005). Lexical tone perception in musicians and non-musicians. INTERSPEECH 2005 – Ninth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Lisbon, Portugal, September 4–8 2005, 397–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aliaga-García, C., Mora, J. C., & Cerviño-Povedano, E. (2011). L2 speech learning in adulthood and phonological short-term memory. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, vol. 47(1), 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avanzi, M., Schwab, S., Dubosson, P. & Goldman, J.-P. (2012). La prosodie de quelques variétés de français parlées en Suisse romande. In A. C. Simon (Ed.), La variation prosodique régionale en français (pp. 89–118). Bruxelles: De Boeck/ Duculot. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 1, 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 41, 417–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. Vol. 8 (pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 1051, 158–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2011). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. [Computer Software]. [URL]
Chang, C. B., & Kwon, S. (2020). The contributions of crosslinguistic influence and individual differences to nonnative speech perception. Languages, 5(4), 49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chartrand, J. P., & Belin, P. (2006). Superior voice timbre processing in musicians. Neuroscience letters, 405(3), 164–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crespo, M. (2011). The effects of task complexity on L2 oral production as mediated by differences in working memory capacity. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Barcelona.
Darcy, I., Park, H., & Yang, C.-L. (2015). Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing. Learning and Individual Differences, 401, 63–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degrave, P. (2020). Music training and the use of songs or rhythm: Do they help for lexical stress processing? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(3), 799–824. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delattre, P. (1938). L’accent final en français: accent d’intensité, accent de hauteur, accent de durée. The French Review, 121, 141–145.Google Scholar
(1969). An acoustic and articulatory study of vowel reduction in four languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching, 71, 294–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diependaele, K., Lemhöfer, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). The word frequency effect in first- and second-language word recognition: a lexical entrenchment account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(5):843–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dogil, G., & Williams, B. (1999). The phonetic manifestation of word stress. In H. van der Hulst (Eds.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe (pp. 273–334). Berlin, New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing ‘deafness’ in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36(3), 406–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), 1606–1618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish, Cognition, 106(2), 682–706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egeland, J. (2015). Measuring working memory with digit span and the Letter-Number Sequencing subtests from the WAIS-IV: Too low manipulation load and risk for underestimating modality effects, Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 22 (6), 445–451, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In: B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 44 (pp. 145–199). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2009). Give input a chance. In T. Piske, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 175–190). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Garde, P. (1968). L’accent. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Gordon, E. (1989). Advanced measures of music audition. Chicago: GIA Publications.Google Scholar
Honbolygó, F., Kóbor, A., & Csépe, V. (2019). Cognitive components of foreign word stress processing difficulty in speakers of a native language with non-contrastive stress. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(2), 366–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hualde, J. I. (2012). Stress and rhythm. In J. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics (pp. 153–171). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inceoglu, S. (2019). Individual differences in L2 speech perception: The role of phonological memory and lipreading ability. The Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 782–799. [URL]. DOI logo
Ivanova, M., Neubert, C. M., Schmied, J., & Benedixen, A. (2023). ERP evidence for Slavic and German word stress cue sensitivity in English. Frontiers in Psychology, 141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jansen, N., Harding, E., Loerts, H., Başkent, D., & Lowie, W. (2022). The relation between musical ability and sentence-level intonation perception: A meta-analysis comparing L1 and non-native listening. Proc. Speech Prosody 2022, 713–717, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jessen, M., Marasek, K., Schneider, K., & Clahssen, K. (1995). Acoustic correlates of word stress and the tense/lax opposition in the vowel system of German. Proc. Int. Congress Phonetic Sci, 131, 428–431.Google Scholar
Knight, R. A., & Hawkins, S. (2013). Research methods in speech perception. In M. J. Jones & R. A. Knight (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Phonetics (pp. 21–38). London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolinsky, R., Cuvelier, H., Goetry, V., Peretz, I., & Morais, J. (2009). Music training facilitates lexical stress processing. Music Perception, 26(3), 235–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lacheret-Dujour, A., & Beaugendre, F. (1999). La prosodie du français. Paris: CNRS éditions.Google Scholar
Léon, P. (2007). Phonétisme et prononciations du français. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Llisterri, J., Machuca, M. J., Ríos, A., & Schwab, S. (2014). El acento en contexto: datos acústicos. In Y. Congosto Martín, M. L. Montero Curiel, & A. Salvador Plans (Eds.), Fonética experimental, educación superior e investigación Vol. I (Experimental phonetics, superior education and investigation) (pp. 357–376). Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Llompart, M. (2021). Lexical and phonetic influences on the phonolexical encoding of difficult second-language contrasts: Insights from nonword rejection. Frontiers in Psychology, 121, 659852. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKay, I. R. A., Meador, D., & Flege, J. E. (2001). The identification of English consonants by native speakers of Italian. Phonetica, 581, 103–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marques, C., Moreno, S., Luís Castro, S., & Besson, M. (2007). Musicians detect pitch violation in a foreign language better than nonmusicians: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(9), 1453–1463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mielicki, M. K., Koppel, R. H., Valencia, G., & Wiley, J. (2018). Measuring working memory capacity with the letter–number sequencing task: Advantages of visual administration. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 321, 805–814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mooshammer, C., & Geng, C. (2008). Acoustic and articulatory manifestations of vowel reduction in German. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 381, 117–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntendam, A., van Rijswijk, R., Severijnen, G. & Dijkstra, T. (2022). The role of stress position in bilingual auditory word recognition: Cognate processing in Turkish and Dutch. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 251, 679–690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, R., Pelzer, B., & te Grotenhuis, M. (2012). Tools for detecting influential data in mixed effects models. The R Journal, 4 (2). URL [URL]
Ortega-Llebaria, M., & Prieto, P. (2009). Perception of word stress in Castilian Spanish: The effects of sentence intonation and vowel type. In M. Vigário, S. Frota, & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology. Interactions and interrelations (pp. 35–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M., Gu, H., & Fan, J. (2013). English Speakers’ perception of Spanish lexical stress: Context-driven L2 stress perception. Journal of Phonetics, 411, 186–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortín, R., & Simonet, M. (2023). Perceptual sensitivity to stress in native English speakers learning Spanish as a second language. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 14(1), 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quilis, A. (1981). Fonética acústica de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
(1999). Tratado de fonética y fonología españolas (2nd ed.). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL]
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 221, 27–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, M. (1979). Le français, langue sans accent. Studia Phonetica, 151, 13–52.Google Scholar
Satori, M. (2021). Effects of working memory on L2 linguistic knowledge and L2 listening comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(5), 1313–1340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwab, S., & Calpini, N. (2018). Expertise musicale et perception de variations de F0 en L1 et en L2. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, 23(1), 15–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwab, S., & Dellwo, V. (2017). Intonation and talker variability in the discrimination of Spanish lexical stress contrasts by Spanish, German and French listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142 1, 2419–2429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Music and L2 prosody: the role of musical aptitude on the discrimination of stress contrasts. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia, August 5–9, 2019, Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
Schwab, S., Kamber, J., Etter, F., Mouthon, M., Rogenmoser, L., Jost, L. B., & Annoni, Jean-Marie. (accepted). Swiss French and Swiss German speakers learning word stress in Spanish: An experimental study. In E. Glaser, J. Kabatek, & B. Sonnenhauser (Eds.), Sprachräume der Schweiz / Espaces linguistiques suisses / Language spaces in Switzerland / Spazi linguistici della Svizzera. Tübingen: Narr/Francke.
Suzukida, Y. (2021). The contribution of individual differences to L2 pronunciation learning: Insights from research and pedagogical implications. RELC Journal, 52(1), 48–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2009). Phonetic variability and the variable perception of L2 word stress by French Canadian listeners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 131, 35–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., Broersma, M., Zeng, Y., Kim, H., Lee, J., & Shin, S. (2021). Dutch listeners’ perception of English lexical stress: A cue-weighting approach. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 149 (6), 3703–3714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale – Fourth Edition (WAIS – IV). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
Wen, Z., & Li, S. (2019). Working memory in L2 learning and processing. In J. W. Schwieter, & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 365–389). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xie, X., & Myers, E. (2015). The impact of musical training and tone language experience on talker identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137 (1), 419–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., Cheng, B., Zou, Y., Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Cognitive factors in nonnative phonetic learning: Impacts of inhibitory control and working memory on the benefits and costs of talker variability. Journal of Phonetics, 1001, 101266, DOI logoGoogle Scholar