Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 1:2 (2018) ► pp.310–333

A corpus study of Chinese EFL learners’ use of circumstance, demand, and significant

An in-depth analysis of L2 vocabulary use and its implications

| The University of Alabama
This study investigated Chinese EFL learners’ use of circumstance, demand, and significant, three challenging words each being a member in a synonym set: circumstance in the case/circumstance/event/situation set, demand in the ask/demand/request/require set, and significant in the important/meaningful/significant set. Via an expert rating and a close examination of all the uses of the three words in Wen, Wang, and Liang’s (2005) Spoken and Written English Corpus of Chinese Learners, the study has uncovered various inappropriate usages as well as successfully acquired usages involving the three words. The results reveal a failure by many Chinese EFL learners to understand the three words’ semantic usage differences with their respective synonyms. The study has also identified L1 interference, inadequate descriptions of these words in dictionaries, and insufficient instructional attention to the semantic usage differences among synonyms as likely reasons for the learners’ inappropriate usages. Pedagogical and research implications are also discussed.
Keywords: learner corpus, L1 interference, (near)-synonym, vocabulary learning
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of related research
    • 2.1Studies on synonymy and other related lexical items
      • 2.1.1Nature and importance of synonymy and research on L1 use of synonymy
      • 2.1.2Research on L2 learning and use of synonymy
    • 2.2Learner corpus studies exploring L2 vocabulary use
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Corpus used
    • 3.2Data retrieval and analysis
  • 4.Data analysis, results, and discussion
    • 4.1Results of quantitative analysis
    • 4.2Results of qualitative analysis
      • 4.2.1Circumstance
      • 4.2.2Demand
      • 4.2.3Significant
  • 6.Conclusion: Pedagogical and research implications
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 27 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00006.liu
References (52)
References
Alanazi, M. (2017). On the production of synonyms by Arabic-speaking EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 71, 17–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arppe, A. (2008). Univariate, bivariate and multivariate methods in corpus-based lexicography – A study of synonymy (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Barcroft, J. (2009). Effects of synonym generation on incidental and intentional L2 vocabulary learning during reading. TESOL Quarterly, 441, 79–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cambridge English learner dictionary online (2018). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2018). Vocabulary and English for specific purposes research: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crossly, S., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. (2010). The development of polysemy and frequency use in English second language speakers. Language Learning, 601, 573–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2008-). The Corpus of Contemporary American English online (1990–2014), <[URL]>
Divjak, D., & Gries, S. Th. (2006). Ways of trying in Russian: Clustering behavioral profiles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 21, 23–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, P., & Hirst, G. (2002). Near synonyms and lexical choice. Computational Linguistics, 281, 105–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 101, 161–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garnier, M., & Schmitt, N. (2016). Picking up polysemous phrasal verbs: How many do learners know and what facilitates this knowledge? System, 591, 29–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. (1988). Second language vocabulary acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 91, 92–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. with Behner, J. & Plonsky, L. (2013) Studies in second language acquisition: An introductory course (4th ed.). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G., De Cock, S., & Granger, S. (2010) Louvain international database of spoken English interlanguage. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Granger, S. (2015). Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 11, 7–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M. (2009) International corpus of learner English v2. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. (2001). A corpus linguistic analysis of English ‑ic vs. ‑ical adjectives. ICAME Journal, 251, 65–108.Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Otani, N. (2010). Behavioral profiles: A corpus-based perspective on synonymy and antonymy. ICAME Journal, 341, 121–150.Google Scholar
Hanks, P. (1996). Contextual dependency and lexical sets. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11, 75–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoang, H., & Boers, F. (2016). Re-telling a story in a second language: How well do adult learners mine an input text for multiword expressions? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 61, 513–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, W. (2013). An empirical study on the teaching of near-synonyms to learners of Chinese as a second Language. 世界汉语教学 [Chinese Teaching in the World], 31, 424–432Google Scholar
Larsen-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (1991). The development of lexis in the production of advanced L2 learners. Modern Language Journal, 751, 440–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Nation, I. S. P. (2012). Vocabulary. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 163–176). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lei, L. (2012). Linking adverbials in academic writing on applied linguistics by Chinese doctoral students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 111, 227–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, X., & Liu, J. (2017). A corpus-based contrastive study on the acquisition of synonyms of Chinese EFL Learners. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 71, 925–934.Google Scholar
(2010b). Going beyond patterns: Involving cognitive analysis in the learning of collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 441, 4–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013a). Salience and construal in the use of synonymy: A study of two sets of near- synonymous nouns. Cognitive Linguistics, 241, 67–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013b). Using corpora to help teach difficult-to-distinguish English words. English Teaching, 68(3), 27–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Describing and explaining grammar and vocabulary in ELT: Key theories and effective practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liu, D., & Espino, M. (2012). Actually, genuinely, really, and truly: A corpus-based behavioral profile study of the near-synonymous adverbs. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 171, 198–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, D., & Zhong, S. (2016). L2 vs. L1 use of synonymy: An empirical study of synonym use/acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 371, 239–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, G. (2007). Yin Han da cidian [The English-Chinese dictionary] (2nd ed.). Shanghai: Translation Press.Google Scholar
Martin, M. (1984). Advanced vocabulary learning: The case of synonyms. Modern Language Journal, 681, 130–137.Google Scholar
Masraia, A., & Milton, J. (2018). Measuring the contribution of academic and general vocabulary knowledge to learners’ academic achievement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 311, 44–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nation, P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford American English dictionary. (2005). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English dictionary online. (2018). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schanding, B., & Pae, H. K. (2018). Shell noun use in English argumentative essays by native speakers of Japanese, Turkish, and English: Frequency and rate of noun-pattern attraction. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 41, 54–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stormbom, C. (2018). Epicene pronouns in intermediate to advanced EFL writing. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 41, 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. (2014). Zuixin gaoji yinghanda cidian [A new advanced English-Chinese dictionary] (3rd ed.). Beijing: Business PressGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. (2003). Near-synonyms as co-extensive categories. Language Sciences, 251, 263–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, L. (2007). Xin Hanying cidian [The new Chinese English dictionary]. Beijing:Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of synonymy on second-language vocabulary learning. Reading in Foreign Language, 19(2), 120–136.Google Scholar
Wen, C., Wang, L., & Liang, M. (2005). Spoken and Written English Corpus of Chinese learners. Shanghai: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Wolter, B., & Yamashita, J. (2015). Processing collocations in a second language: a case of first language activation? Applied Psycholinguistics, 361, 1193–1221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, G. (2010). Hanying da cidian [Big Chinese English dictionary] (3rd ed.). Shanghai: Foreign Translation Press.Google Scholar
Yeh, Y., Liou, H., & Li, Y. (2007). Online synonym materials and concordancing for EFL college writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 201, 131–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Liu, Daohuan & Xuri Tang
2023. The Contextualized Representation of Collocation. In Chinese Computational Linguistics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14232], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.