Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Studies: Online-First ArticlesHow do constructions with modal verbs develop in second language learners of English?
The study reported on in this paper uses data from a large, pseudolongitudinal corpus of second language (L2) learner writing to investigate how L2 knowledge of verb-argument constructions (VACs) develops from low-beginner to upper-intermediate proficiency levels. The focus is on learners from two L1 backgrounds (L1 German and L1 Spanish) and on a subset of VACs that contain modal auxiliaries in combination with lexical verbs (e.g., subject-modal-verb, as in I can cook). For each VAC, L1, and proficiency level, frequency lists of verbs were created and compared across datasets. Reference data on the same constructions was extracted from a corpus of L1 writing. Results suggest that modal VACs become more frequent, less predictable, more productive, and more aligned with L1 production as learner proficiency increases. The findings of this study help to expand our understanding of the processes that underlie L2 construction acquisition.
Keywords: modals, verb-argument constructions, learner corpus, second language development, usage-based SLA, German learners, Spanish learners
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Modal verb constructions and second language acquisition
- 3.Data and methods
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Distribution of high-frequency modal constructions in learner production across levels
- 4.2Verbs in modal constructions in learner production across levels
- 4.3Modal constructions in learner production and L1 usage
- 4.4Modal constructions in learner production across L1s
- 5.Conclusion and outlook
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
References
References (78)
Alexopoulou, T., Geertzen, J., Korhonen, A., & Meurers, D. (2015). Exploring big educational learner corpora for SLA research: Perspectives on relative clauses. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research,
1
(1), 96–129. 
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. (2015). A constructivist account of child language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Emergence (pp. 478–510). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2002). A new starting point? Investigating formulaic use and input in future expressions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,
24
1, 189–198.
Behrens, H. (2009). Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics,
47
(2), 383–411.
Bergs, A. (2010). Expression of futurity in contemporary English: A construction grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics,
14
(2), 217–238.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Boogaart, R. (2009). Semantics and pragmatics in construction grammar: The case of modal verbs. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp. 213–241). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cappelle, B., & Depraetere, I. (2016). Short-circuited interpretations of modal verb constructions. Some evidence from The Simpsons. Constructions and Frames,
8
(1), 7–39.
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Chen, H. (2010). Contrastive learner corpus analysis of epistemic modality and interlanguage pragmatic competence in L2 writing. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching,
17
1, 27–51.
Chen, D., & Manning, C. D. (2014). A fast and accurate dependency parser using neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 740–750). Retrieved from [URL].
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davies, M. (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990-present. Available online at [URL]
de Marneffe, M.-C., & Manning, C. D. (2008). Stanford typed dependencies manual (revised for the Stanford Parser v. 3.5.2 in April 2015). Retrieved from [URL]
Deshors, S. (2014). Constructing meaning in L2 discourse: The case of modal verbs and sequential dependencies. In D. Glynn & M. Sjölin (Eds.), Subjectivity and Epistemicity. Corpus, discourse and literary approaches to stance (pp. 329–348). MediaTryck Lund, Sweden.
Díez-Bedmar, M. B. (2012). The use of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages to evaluate compositions in the English exam section of the university admissions examination. Revista de Educación,
357
1, 55–79.
Diessel, H. (2004). The development of complex sentence constructions in English: A usage-based approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 63–103). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. (2009). Constructing a second language. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics,
7
1 (Special section), 111–290.
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics,
7
1, 188–221.
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics – Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics,
27
(4), 558–589.
Ellis, N. C., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2014). Construction learning as category learning: A cognitive analysis. In T. Herbst, H. J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions Collocations Patterns. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 71–97.
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016). Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar (Language Learning Monograph Series). Malden, MA: Wiley.
Elturki, E. and Salsbury, T. (2016). A cross-sectional investigation of the development of modality in English language learners’ writing: A corpus-driven study. Issues in Applied Linguistics 20. [URL].
Eskildsen, S. W. (2009). Constructing another language: Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics,
30
(3), 335–357.
(2012). L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning,
62
(2), 335–372.
(2014). What’s new? A usage-based classroom study of linguistic routines and creativity in L2 learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics,
52
(1), 1–30.
(2017). The emergence of creativity in L2 English: A usage-based case study. In N. Bell (Ed.). Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp. 281–316). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T. (2007). Are recurring multi-word expressions really syntactic freezes? Second language acquisition from the perspective of usage-based linguistics. In M. Nenonen & Niemi, S. (Eds.). Collocations and Idioms 1. Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes (Vol. 411). Joensuu, Finland: Joensuu University Press, 86–99.
Eskildsen, S. W., Cadierno, T., & Li, P. (2015). On the development of motion constructions in four learners of L2 English. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 207–232). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2019). The Trinity Lancaster Corpus: Development, description and application. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research,
5
(2), 126–158.
Geertzen, J., Alexopoulou, T., & Korhonen, A. (2013). Automatic linguistic annotation of large scale L2 databases: The EF-Cambridge Open Language Database (EFCAMDAT). Proceedings of the 31st Second Language Research Forum (SLRF). Carnegie Mellon University: Cascadilla Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science,
7
1, 219–224.
(2006). Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2019). Explain Me This. Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics,
15
1, 289–316.
Goldberg, A. E. & van der Auwera, J. (2012). This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica,
46
(1), 109–132.
Hall, C. J., Joyce, J., & Robson, C. (2017). Investigating the lexico-grammatical resources of a non-native user of English: The case of can and could in email requests. Applied Linguistics Review,
8
(1), 35–59.
Hawkins, J. A., & Buttery, P. (2010). Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal,
1
(1), 1–23.
Hilpert, M. (2016). Change in modal meanings: Another look at the shifting collocates of may
. Constructions and Frames,
8
(1), 66–85.
Hinkel, E. (1995). The Use of Modal Verbs as a Reflection of Cultural Values. TESOL Quarterly,
29
(2), 325–343.
Khushik, G. A., & Huhta, A. (2019). Investigating syntactic complexity in EFL learners’ writing across Common European Framework of Reference levels A1, A2, and B1. Applied Linguistics, 1–28.
Kumar, U., Kumar, V., & Kapur, J. N. (1986). Normalized measures of entropy. International Journal of General Systems,
12
(1), 55–69.
Kyle, K. (2016). Measuring Syntactic Development in L2 Writing: Fine Grained Indices of Syntactic Complexity and Usage-Based Indices of Syntactic Sophistication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, USA.
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. (2017). Assessing syntactic sophistication in L2 writing: A usage-based approach. Language Testing,
34
(4), 513–535.
Lahuerta Martínez, A. C. (2018). Analysis of syntactic complexity in secondary education EFL writers at different proficiency levels. Assessing Writing,
35
1, 1–11.
Leclercq, B. (2022). From modals to modal constructions: An n-gram analysis of can, could and be able to. Constructions and Frames,
14
(2), 226–261.
Li, P., Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T. (2014). Tracing an L2 learner’s motion constructions over time: A usage-based classroom investigation. The Modern Language Journal,
98
1, 612–628.
Lieven, E., Pine, J. M., & Baldwin, G. (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language,
24
(1), 187–219.
Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly,
45
(1), 36–62.
Lyngfelt, B. (2018). Introduction: Constructions and Constructicography. In B. Lyngfelt, L. Borin, K. Ohara, & T. Timponi Torren (Eds.), Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Murakami, A. (2013). L1 Influence and Individual Variation in the L2 Accuracy Development of Grammatical Morphemes: Insights from Learner Corpora. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, UK.
Ninio, A. (1999). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language,
26
1, 619–653.
(2006). Language and the Learning Curve. A New Theory of Syntactic Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nisioi, S. (2015). Feature analysis for native language identification. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2015. Cham: Springer.
R Development Core Team. (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Roehr-Brackin, K. (2014). Explicit knowledge and processes from a usage-based perspective: The developmental trajectory of an instructed L2 learner. Language Learning,
64
(4), 771–808.
Römer, U. (2019). A corpus perspective on the development of verb constructions in second language learners. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics,
24
(3), 268–290.
Römer, U. & Garner, J. R. (2019). The development of verb constructions in spoken learner English: Tracing effects of usage and proficiency. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
5
(2), 207–230.
(2022). What can corpus linguistics tell us about second language acquisition? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (2nd edition). London: Routledge. 328–340.
Römer, U., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C. (2014). Second language learner knowledge of verb-argument constructions: Effects of language transfer and typology. The Modern Language Journal,
98
(4), 952–975.
Römer, U., Roberson, A., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C. (2014). Linking learner corpus and experimental data in studying second language learners’ knowledge of verb-argument constructions. ICAME Journal,
38
1, 59–79.
Römer, U., Skalicky, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2020). Verb-argument constructions in advanced L2 English learner production: Insights from corpora and verbal fluency tasks. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory,
16
(2), 303–331.
Römer, U. & Yilmaz, S. (2019). Effects of L2 usage and L1 transfer on Turkish learners’ production of English verb-argument constructions. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics
16
1, 107–133.
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing the abstractness of children’s linguistic representations: Lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Science,
6
(5), 557–567.
Shatz, I. (2020). Refining and modifying the EFCAMDAT: Lessons from creating a new corpus from an existing large-scale English learner language database. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research,
6
(2), 220–236.
Tan, Y. & Römer, U. (2022). Using phrase-frames to trace the language development of L1 Chinese learners of English. System,
108
1,
Tomasello, M. (1992). First Verbs. A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2003). Constructing a Language. A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tono, Y., & Díez-Bedmar, M. B. (2014). Focus on learner writing at the beginning and intermediate stages: The ICCI corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics,
19
(2), 163–177.
Torres-Martínez, S. (2019). Taming English modals: How a construction grammar approach helps to understand modal verbs. English Today,
35
(2), 50–57.
Trousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T. (Eds.). (2013). Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tyler, A. E., Mueller, C. M., & Ho, V. (2010). Applying cognitive linguistics to instructed L2 learning. AILA Review,
23
1, 30–49.
Tyler, A. E., & Ortega, L. (2018). Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. In Tyler, A. E., L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-Inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy (pp. 3–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yang, X. (2018). A corpus-based study of modal verbs in Chinese learners’ academic writing. English Language Teaching,
11
(2), 122–130.
Zipf, G. K. (1935). The Psycho-biology of Language. An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.