Article In:
Journal of Second Language Studies: Online-First ArticlesModeling expression of the research gap in text-based reading instruction
A corpus-based approach
This small-scale intervention aimed to prepare students to express a particular academic writing feature (the
research gap) through a structured intervention in corpus reading tasks. Four undergraduate (second year) students majoring in
English education participated in a collaborative corpus-based analysis of selected published articles. They then drew on the
corpus exemplars to develop their own gap statements. Data were collected from focus group interviews, students’ learning
journals, and learning artifacts. There were two key findings. First, the students indicated that corpus-based analysis helped
them become critical readers to recognize lexis used to show the research gap in the corpus-based database. Secondly, students
learned from the collocation patterns in the corpus to express the research gap in their own contexts. The study has practical
implications for language teaching demonstrating how corpus-based text-based language teaching can be a catalyst for students to
become active and critical meaning makers.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Data-driven learning and corpus studies in English for academic purposes
- 2.2Text-based academic reading and meta-discourse markers
- 3.Research design
- 3.1Research context and participants
- 3.2Data collection
- 3.3Trustworthiness
- 3.4Data analysis
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Corpus-based analysis mediated critical reading
- 4.2Collocation patterns-informed research gap statement
- Discussion
- 5.Limitations and implications
- 6.Conclusion
-
Reference
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (55)
Alsehibany, R. A. & Abdelhalim, S. M. (2023). Overcoming academic vocabulary errors through online corpus consultation: the case of Saudi English majors, Computer Assisted Language Learning,
Barton, E. L. (1995). Contrastive and Non-Contrastive Connectives. Written Communication,
12
(2), 219–239.
Bell, L. & Lygo-Baker, S. (2019). Student-centred learning: a smallscale study of a peer-learning experience in undergraduate translation classes, The Language Learning Journal,
47
(3), 299–312,
Biber, D. (2015). Corpus-Based and Corpus-Driven Analyses of Language Variation and Use’, in B. Heine, and H. Narrog (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Charles, M. (2012). “Proper vocabulary and juicy collocations”: EAP students evaluate do-it-yourself corpus-building. English for Specific Purposes,
31
(2), 93–102.
Chen, H. J. H., Lai, S. L., Lee, K. Y. & Yang, C. T. Y. (2023). Developing and evaluating an academic collocations and phrases search engine for academic writers, Computer Assisted Language Learning,
36
(4), 641–668,
Coffin, C., & Donohue, J. P. (2012). Academic Literacies and systemic functional linguistics: How do they relate? Journal of English for Academic Purposes,
11
(1), 64–75.
Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33–43.
Crosthwaite, P. (2017). Retesting the limits of data-driven learning: feedback and error correction, Computer Assisted Language Learning,
30
(6), 447–473,
Dong, J., & Lu, X. (2020). Promoting discipline-specific genre competence with corpus-based genre analysis activities. English for Specific Purposes, 581, 138–154.
Dunn, K. E., Rakes, G. C., & Rakes, T. A. (2014). Influence of academic self-regulation, critical thinking, and age on online graduate students’ academic help-seeking. Distance Education,
35
(1), 75–89.
Eckstein, G., Miner, S., Watkins, K., James, J., Sims, M., Baker, A. W., & Grahl, L. (2020). Reading academic citations: How professors and graduate students read for different purposes. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal,
20
(1), 1–19.
Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246.
Farahani, M. V. & Ghane, Z. (2022). Unpacking the function(s) of discourse markers in academic spoken English: A corpus-based study. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy,
45
1, 49–70.
Ha, M.-J. (2016). Linking adverbials in first-year Korean university EFL learners’ writing: a corpus-informed analysis, Computer Assisted Language Learning,
29
(6), 1090–1101,
Hammer, S. J. & Green, W. (2011). Critical thinking in a first year management unit: the relationship between disciplinary learning, academic literacy and learning progression. Higher Education Research & Development,
30
(3), 303–315.
Howard, P. J., Gorzycki, M., Desa, G., & Allen, D. D. (2018). Academic Reading: Comparing Students’ and Faculty Perceptions of Its Value, Practice, and Pedagogy. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 48(3), 189–209.
(2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing,
31
1, 58–69.
Johns, T. (1991). Should you be persuaded: two examples of data-driven learning. English Language Research Journal, 41. Department of English, University of Birmingham, pp. 1–16.
Laminack, L. (2017). Mentors and mentor texts: What, why, and how? The Reading Teacher,
70
(6), 753–755.
Liu, T., & Gablasova, D. (2023). Data-driven learning of collocations by Chinese learners of English: a longitudinal perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–26.
Liu, X. & Read, J. (2020). General skill needs and challenges in university academic reading: Voices from undergraduates and language teachers, Journal of College Reading and Learning,
50
(2), 70–93,
Love, R. (2020). Overcoming Challenges in Corpus Construction: The Spoken British National Corpus 2014. New York: Routledge.
Lu, X., Casal, J. E., & Liu, Y. (2020). The rhetorical functions of syntactically complex sentences in social science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 441, 100832–16.
Lyman, B. G., & Collins, M. D. (1990). Critical reading: A redefinition. Reading Research and Instruction,
29
(3), 56–63.
Ma, Q., Yuan, R., Cheung, L. M. E., & Yang, J. (2022). Teacher paths for developing corpus-based language pedagogy: a case study, Computer Assisted Language Learning,
Ma, R. & Qin, X. (2017). Individual factors influencing citation competence in L2 academic writing, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics,
Macalister, J. (2007). Implementing extensive reading in an EAP programme. ELT Journal,
62
(3), 248–256.
Markos, A. & Buss, R. R. (2022). Using mentor texts to develop disciplinary literacy of scholarly practitioners through dissertations in practice. Impacting Education,
7
(1), 9–15.
Mickan, P. (2017). Text-based research and teaching from a social semiotic perspective: Transformative research and pedagogy. In P. Mickan and E. Lopez (Eds.). Text-based Research and Teaching: A Social Semiotic Perspective on Language in Use. pp. 15–36. Palgrave MacMillan.
Moon, R. (1998). Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-based Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mur Dueñas, P. (2011). A corpus-based analysis of two crucial steps in business management research articles: The creation of a research space and the statement of limitations. Nordic Journal of English Studies,
11
(1), 55–78.
Mur-Dueñas, P. (2012). A corpus-based analysis of two crucial steps in Business Management research articles: The creation of a research space and the statement of limitations. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 11(1), 55–78.
Nelson, T. S., & Albakry, M. (2020). Building a Corpus-Based Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Model in University Reading Support Courses. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 51(1), 17–33.
Nelson, T. S. & Albakry, M. (2021). Building a corpus-based interdisciplinary vocabulary model in university reading support courses, Journal of College Reading and Learning,
51
(1), 17–33,
Ng, Q. R., Renandya, W. A., & Chong, M. Y. C. (2019). Extensive reading: Theory, research, and implementation. TEFLIN,
3
(2), 171–186.
Nhapulo, M. A., Simon, E. & Van Herreweghe, M. (2017). Enhancing academic reading skills through extensive reading, Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies,
35
(1), 17–40,
Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. HSR: Health Service Research, 34(5), 1189–1208.
Peels, R., & Bouter, L. (2023). Replication and trustworthiness, Accountability in Research, 30(2), 77–87,
Poole, R. (2020). “Corpus can be tricky”: revisiting teacher attitudes towards corpus-aided language learning and teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1620–1641.
(2022). “Corpus can be tricky”: revisiting teacher attitudes towards corpus-aided language learning and teaching, Computer Assisted Language Learning,
35
(7), 1620–1641,
Reynolds, B. L. (2015). Helping Taiwanese graduate students help themselves: Applying corpora to industrial management English as a foreign language academic reading and writing, Computers in the Schools,
32
(3–4), 300–317,
Ro, E. (2016). Exploring teachers’ practices and students’ perceptions of the extensive reading approach in EAP reading classes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 221, 32–41.
Tribble, C., & Wingate, U. (2013). From text to corpus — A genre-based approach to academic literacy instruction. System,
41
(2), 307–321.
Wahyudi, R. (2017). The generic structure of the call for papers of predatory journals: A social semiotic perspective. In P. Mickan and E. Lopez (Eds.). Text-based Research and Teaching: A Social Semiotic Perspective on Language in Use. pp. 117–136. Palgrave MacMillan.
Wald, N., Harland, T., & Daskon, C. (2024). The gap statement and justification in higher education research: an analysis of published articles, European Journal of Higher Education,
14
(2), 308–323,
Wang, Y., & Lu, X. (2023). Conceptualizing corpus-based genre pedagogy as usage-inspired second language instruction. Corpus-based Studies across Humanities, 1(1), 133–155.
Ward, B., Collet, V., & Eilers, L. (2021). Using published authors as mentors to teach grammatical conventions. Research Papers in Education, 37(5), 667–685.
Wilcox, B., Morrison, T. G., & Oaks, D. D. (1999). Computer corpora and authentic texts: Toward more effective language teaching, Literacy Research and Instruction,
38
(4), 415–423,