References

References

Agebjörn, A.
(2021) Swedish noun-phrase structure in Russian-speaking learners: An explorative study of L1 influence and input-frequency effects. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 5(1), 16–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, D.
(2017) Definite and demonstrative descriptions: A micro-typology. In M. Yoshitaka Erlewine (Ed.), Proceedings of Generative Linguistics in the Old World (GLOW) in Asia 2017, 1, 33–48.Google Scholar
Ahn, D., & Davidson, K.
(2018) Where pointing matters: English and Korean demonstratives. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS), Vol. 48.Google Scholar
Aissen, J.
(2003) Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 435–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, M.
(1988) Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24, 65–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London, UK: Routledge, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
(2001) Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation, linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 29–87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(2013) Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63, 68–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Acquisition of L2 pragmatics. In S. Lowewn & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 224–245). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A.
(2007) Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 657–689. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C.
(2003) A study of the determiner phrase of Spanish, English and Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Texas at Austin, USA.Google Scholar
Chang, S.
(1984) Cisiwa coung [Reference and anaphora, written in Korean]. Hangul, 186, 115–149.Google Scholar
Chang, S. J.
(2009) Nominal structure and interpretation: On the syntax of the Korean Determiner Phrase. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, USA.Google Scholar
Cho, H.
(1999) Interpretation and function of the Korean demonstrative ku . Studies in Modern Grammar, 18, 71–90.Google Scholar
Cho, J.
(2017) The acquisition of different types of definite noun phrases in L2-English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(3), 367–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, M.
(2007) The R book. Chichester, England: Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Hoop, H.
(2003) On the interpretation of stressed pronouns. In M. Weisgerber (Ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 7 (pp. 159–172). Konstanz, Germany: University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Dupuy, L., Stateva, P., Andreetta, S., Cheylus, A., Déprez, V., van der Henst, J., Jayez, J., Stepanov, R., & Reboul, A.
(2019) Pragmatic abilities in bilinguals: The case of scalar implicatures. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(2), 314–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, K.
(1971) Zwei formen des bestimmten artikels. In D. Wunderlich (Ed.), Probleme and fortsschritte der transformationsgrammatik (pp. 159–74). Munich: Max Hueber.Google Scholar
Grice, P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Studies in syntax: Vol 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R.
(1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. A.
(1978) Definiteness and indefiniteness. London, UK: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
(1991) On (in)definite articles: implicatures and (un) grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics, 27(2), 405–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2009) The syntax-discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(4), 463–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, L.
(1972) On the semantic properties of the logical operators in English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California Los Angeles, USA.Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K.
(2004) Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12(1), 3–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Baek, S., Kim, E., Ko, H., & Wexler, K.
(2012) That’s not so different from the: Definite and demonstrative descriptions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 28(1), 69–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Isard, S. D.
(1975) Changing the context In E. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural language (pp. 287–296). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kameyama, M.
(1999) Stressed and unstressed pronouns: Complementary preferences. In P. Bosch & R. van der Sandt (Eds.), Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives (pp. 306–321). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kehler, A., & Ward, G.
(2006) Referring expressions and conversational implicature. In B. Birner & G. Ward (Eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn (pp. 177–193). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Bruun Brockhoff, P., & Haubo Bojesen Christensen, R.
(2016) lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0–33. Retrieved from https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=lmerTest
Levinson, S.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, D., & Gleason, J. L.
(2002) Acquisition of the article the by non-native speakers of English: An analysis of four non-generic uses. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(1), 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maclaran, R.
(1982) The semantics and pragmatics of the English demonstratives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cornell University, USA.Google Scholar
Miller, D., Giancaspro, D., Iverson, M., Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R.
(2016) Not just algunos, but indeed unos L2ers can acquire scalar implicatures in L2 Spanish. In A. de la Fuente, E. Valenzuela, & C. Martínez Sanz (Eds) Language acquisition beyond parameters. Studies in honour of Juana M. Liceras (pp. 125–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakatani, C.
(1993) Accenting on pronouns and proper names in spontaneous narrative. In D. House & P. Touati (Eds.), Proceedings of the European speech communication association workshop on prosody (pp. 164–167). Lund, Sweden: ESCA.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., Marsden, E., Crowther, D., Gass, S. M., & Spinner, P.
(2020) A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research, 36(4), 583–621. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C.
(2002) Demonstratives as definites. In K. van Deemter & R. Kibble (Eds.) Information sharing: Reference and presupposition in language generation and interpretation (pp. 89–196). Standford, CA: CSLI Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 287–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D.
(2000) Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16(2), 135–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, F.
(2009) Two types of definites in natural language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusettes Amherst, USA.Google Scholar
(2013) Two kinds of definites cross-linguistically. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7(10), 534–559. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2010) Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Lingua, 120(10), 2444–2462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snape, N.
(2008) Resetting the Nominal Mapping Parameter in L2 English: Definite article use and the count-mass distinction. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 63–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snape, N., & Hosoi, H.
(2018) Acquisition of scalar implicatures: Evidence from adult Japanese L2 learners of English. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(2), 163–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2003) Near-nativeness. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 130–151). Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F.
(2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spinner, P., & Gass, S.
(2019) Using judgments in second language research. New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sprouse, J., Caponigro, I., Greco, C., & Cecchetto, C.
(2016) Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 34(1), 307–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C.
(2017) Second language pragmatics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wike, E. L., & Church, J.
(1976) Comments on Clark’s “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 249–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar