Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 5:1 (2022) ► pp.114–143

The impact of teaching approach on growth in L2 proficiency and self-efficacy

A longitudinal classroom-based study of TBLT and PPP

| Kindai University
| Kindai University
Despite the increasing popularity of task-based language teaching (TBLT) among researchers and teachers, further classroom-based empirical evidence is needed to support its use over more traditional teaching approaches such as presentation practice production (PPP). The argument that TBLT is ‘legislation by hypothesis’ (Swan, 2005), is yet to be completely refuted (Ellis, 2018). Four intact classes of Japanese university students taking a one-year oral English course were randomly assigned to either a TBLT or PPP teaching condition. Speaking proficiency and speaking self-efficacy were measured three times during the year to discover the differential impact of teaching approach on growth. Student interviews provided insights into their views on the different approaches. Results showed that students in TBLT and PPP classes experienced growth in both proficiency and self-efficacy, and there was no difference in final outcomes for the two conditions. However, patterns of growth for the groups were different.
Keywords: TBLT, PPP, self-efficacy, classroom interaction, speaking
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1TBLT and PPP
    • 2.2Teaching approach and language proficiency
    • 2.3Self-efficacy
    • 2.4Student beliefs
  • 3.Research questions
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Operationalization of TBLT and PPP for classroom-based research
    • 4.3Measures
    • 4.4Analyses
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Growth in proficiency
    • 5.2Growth in SE
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Proficiency and self-efficacy
    • 6.2Students’ beliefs
  • 7.Conclusion and limitations
  • References
Published online: 9 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.20014.har
References (68)
References
Anderson, J. (2017). A potted history of PPP with the help of ELT Journal. ELT Journal, 71 (2), 218–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D. & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bryfonski, L. & McKay, T. H. (2017). TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cancino, H., Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J. H. (1978). The Acquisition of English Negatives and Interrogatives by Native Spanish Speakers. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition (pp. 207–230). Newbury House.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2009). Revisiting the TBLT versus PPP debate: Voices from Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching 191, 49–66.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 51, 161–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (2), 195–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.). (2007). Practicing in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2018). Reflections on task-based language teaching. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2019). Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching Research, 23 (4), 454–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. & Shintani, N. (2014). Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage.Google Scholar
Foster, P. (1998). A Classroom Perspective on the Negotiation of Meaning, Applied Linguistics, 19 (1), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ganjouee, A. A., Ghonsooly, B., & Fatemi, A. H. (2018). The impact of task-based instruction on the enhancement of Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ speaking skill and emotional intelligence. Applied Research on English Language 7(2), 195–214.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1979). Social psychological aspect of second language acquisition. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 193–220). Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2007). Learner strategies and self-efficacy: Making the connection. Language Learning, 35 (1), 81–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, S. J. and Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58 (4), 747–783. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graus, J., & Coppen, P. (2016). Student teacher beliefs on grammar instruction. Language Teaching Research 20(5), 571–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harmer, J. (2010). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed). Longman.Google Scholar
Horwitz, E. K. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin, (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 119–129). Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
King, J. (2013). Silence in the Japanese classroom. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeming, P. (2017). A longitudinal investigation into English speaking self-efficacy in a Japanese language classroom. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 2, (12), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linacre, J. M. (2007a). FACETS: A computer program for the analysis of multi-faceted data [Computer software]. MESA.Google Scholar
(2007b). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch-model computer program. MESA Press.Google Scholar
(2011). A user’s guide to FACETS: Rasch-model computer program. MESA Press.Google Scholar
Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (2007). WINSTEPS: Multiple-choice, rating scale, and partial credit Rasch analysis [Computer software]. MESA.Google Scholar
Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learner’s beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal 93(1), 91–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition (pp. 77–99). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. De Bot, G. Kees; R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2016). In defence of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 5–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madarsara, A. M., & Rahimy, R. (2015). Examining the effect of task complexity and sequence on speaking ability of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature 4(1), 247–254.Google Scholar
Manalo, E., Koyasu, M., Hashimoto, K., & Miyauchi, T. (2006). Factors that impact the academic motivation of Japanese students in Japan and in New Zealand. Psychologia, 491, 114–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsuura, H., Chiba, R., & Hilderbrandt, P. (2001). Beliefs and learning and teaching communicative English in Japan. JALT Journal 23 (1), 69–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. Arnold.Google Scholar
Mills, N. (2014). Self-efficacy in second language acquisition. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 6–19). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2006). A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Self-efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39 (2), 276–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosquera, L. H. (2012). A research study on task-based language assessment. Revista de Lenguas Modernas, 161, 215–227.Google Scholar
Nitta, R., & Nakatsuhara, F. (2014). A multifaceted approach to investigating pre-task planning effects on paired oral task performance. Language Testing, 31 (2), 147–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. & L. Ortega. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 501, 417–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunan, D. (1995). Closing the gap between learning and instruction. TESOL Quarterly 29(1), 133–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ockey, G. J., Koyama, D., & Setoguchi, E. (2013). Stakeholder input and test design: A case study on changing the interlocutor familiarity facet of the group oral discussion test. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10 (3), 292–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ooyoung Pyun, D. (2013). Attitudes towards task-based language learning: A study of college Korean language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 46 (1), 108–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piniel, K., & Csizér, K. (2015). Changes in motivation, anxiety and self-efficacy during the course of an academic writing seminar. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 164–194). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning 64(4), 878–912. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, R. (2009). Suggestion for creating approaches suitable to the Japanese EFL environment. The Language Teacher, 33 (9), 11–14.Google Scholar
Sato, M., and Loewen, S. (2019). Toward evidence-based second language pedagogy: Research proposals and pedagogical recommendations. In M. Sato & S. Loewen (Eds.), Evidence-based second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition studies (pp. 1–24), Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schommer, M. (1994). An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in learning. In R. Garner & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 25–55). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Seargeant, P. (2009). The idea of English in Japan: Ideology and the evolution of a global language. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N. (2015). The incidental grammar acquisition in focus on form and focus on forms instruction for Young Beginner Learners. TESOL Quarterly, 49 (1), 115–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, E., & Taverniers, M. (2011). Advanced EFL learners’ beliefs about language learning and teaching: A comparison between grammar, pronunciation, and vocabulary. English Studies 92(8), 896–922. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spada, N. & Y. Tomita. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60(2), 1–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26 (3), 376–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swanson, P. (2014). The power of belief: Spanish teachers’ sense of efficacy and student performance on the national Spanish exams. Hispania, 97 (1), 5–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A Transdisciplinary Framework for SLA in a Multilingual World. The Modern Language Journal, 1001, 19–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torky, S. (2006). The effectiveness of a task-based instruction program in developing the English language speaking skills of secondary stage. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by (23)

Cited by 23 other publications

Chen, Liping & Craig Lambert
2024. Focus on form in the uptake, stability and transfer of relative clause use across tasks. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 4:1 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Istek, Esra & Chinaza Solomon Ironsi
2024. Incorporating mobile learning and the CAP(E) framework in improving the receptive skills of students. Library Hi Tech 42:2 ► pp. 711 ff. DOI logo
Syquia, John & Paul Leeming
2024. Assessing interactional competence through group discussion: A mixed methods validation. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3:3 ► pp. 100144 ff. DOI logo
Wei, Ran & Xiaoyan Zhao
2024. Effects of task-based language teaching on functional adequacy in L2 writing. Assessing Writing 60 ► pp. 100838 ff. DOI logo
Huynh , Truong Sang & Van Loi Nguyen
2023. Review of the effects of Task-based Language Teaching on EFL learners’ speaking performance: What remains to be researched?. CTU Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 15:3 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Isaacs, Talia & Hamish Chalmers
2023. Reducing ‘avoidable research waste’ in applied linguistics research: Insights from healthcare research. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Jia, Shijiao & Madhubala Bava Harji
2023. Themes, knowledge evolution, and emerging trends in task-based teaching and learning: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Education and Information Technologies 28:8 ► pp. 9783 ff. DOI logo
Kim, YouJin, Sanghee Kang, Meredith D’Arienzo & Naoko Taguchi
2023. Comparing traditional and task-based approaches to teaching pragmatics: Task design processes and learning outcomes. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Li, Linghong, Martin Valcke, Linda Badan & Christoph Anderl
2023. Exploring the impact of audio self‐modelling on Chinese as a foreign language students' tone pronunciation skill, self‐efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning DOI logo
Madonsela, Stanley
2023. Assessment of vocabulary in First Additional Languages: A focus on Siswati Grade 12 examination papers. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 41:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Studer, Thomas
2023. Handlungsorientierung im Unterricht? Ja, klar. Aber was und wie genau eigentlich, warum und was kommt dabei heraus?. In IDT 2022: *mit.sprache.teil.haben Band 4: Beiträge zur Methodik und Didaktik Deutsch als Fremd*Zweitsprache, ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Wei, Lin, Xiaoxue Chen, Mingyue Zheng, Li He, Xiaotong Zhang, Yuan Gao, J. Xu, A. Windapo, M.H.A. Hassan & A. Hajiyev
2023. An Analysis on the Influencing Factors of Learning Motivation Based in the Teaching Blending Online and Offline: The Mediating Role of Self-efficacy and Task value. E3S Web of Conferences 409 ► pp. 03007 ff. DOI logo
Wen, Ju-May, Hai-Dung Do, Eric Zhi-Feng Liu, Chun-Hung Lin & Shihping Kevin Huang
2023. Strengthening Writing Ability Among Students Learning Chinese as a Second Language Through Creative Thinking Spiral Teaching Strategy. Sage Open 13:3 DOI logo
Xu, Jian, Xuyan Qiu & Lei Yang
2023. Unraveling the dynamics of English communicative motivation and self-efficacy through task-supported language teaching: a latent growth modeling perspective. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
Xu, Zhiqing, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Judy M. Parr
2023. Incorporating peer feedback in writing instruction: examining its effects on Chinese English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners’ writing performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:4 ► pp. 1337 ff. DOI logo
Harris, Justin
2022. Measuring listening and speaking self-efficacy in EFL contexts: The development of the Communicative SE Questionnaire. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Leeming, Paul & Justin Harris
2022. Measuring speaking proficiency growth in the language classroom: An investigation of practical approaches for teachers. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Liu, Lingjuan & Kalidoss Rajakani
2022. The Teaching Effectiveness of Civics Class Based on the Optimization of Integrated Teaching and Deep Learning. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Moore, Paul J.
2022. Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) in Japanese EFL Contexts. In International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Moore, Paul J.
2023. Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) in Japanese EFL Contexts. In International Handbook on Education Development in the Asia-Pacific, ► pp. 661 ff. DOI logo
Paul Sun, Peijian & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2022. Effects of Translanguaging in Online Peer Feedback on Chinese University English-as-a-Foreign-Language Students’ Writing Performance. RELC Journal 53:2 ► pp. 325 ff. DOI logo
Rahimi, Siamak & Ehsan Rezvani
2022. The Effects of Task-Based Speaking Tasks on Iranian University Students Willingness to Communicate and Self-Efficacy in Online Classes: A Mixed-Methods Study. Education Research International 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Jing, Lawrence Jun Zhang, Xiao Wang & Tingting Zhang
2021. Impacts of Self-Regulated Strategy Development-Based Revision Instruction on English-as-a-Foreign-Language Students' Self-Efficacy for Text Revision: A Mixed-Methods Study. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.