Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Vol. 1:1 (2022) ► pp.43–66

The reflexive cycle

From reflexive to personal pronoun in Uralic

ORCID logo | Hungarian Research Centre for LinguisticsHungary
| Hungarian Research Centre for LinguisticsHungary
Starting from a morphosyntactic puzzle of the Ugric and Samoyedic languages of the Uralic family (possessive agreement suffixes functioning as accusative allomorphs on pronominal objects), this paper identifies a pronoun cycle which leads from reflexives via intensifiers and via referentially independent intensive pronouns to neutral pronouns. In Tundra Nenets, evidence of three rounds of reflexive renewal is also pointed out, with the three sets of pronouns frozen at different stages of the cycle. The analysis has implications for debated issues of language change. It is shown that elements participating in cyclic changes not only suffer feature loss but also incorporate features. Based on the recurring cycle in Tundra Nenets, it is argued that the cyclicity of linguistic changes implies a notion of unidirectionality that also leaves room for unpredictable outcomes.
Keywords: reflexive, personal pronoun, intensifier, differential object marking, accusative case, possessive agreement, Uralic, Ob-Ugric, Tundra Nenets, linguistic cycle
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Facts to explain: Possessive agreement qua accusative case
  • 3.The source of possessive agreement on object pronouns: Reflexives in Ugric and Samoyedic
  • 4.From reflexives to intensifiers; from intensified pronouns to intensive pronouns
  • 5.The distribution of intensive pronouns in the Ugric and Samoyedic sentence
  • 6.From intensive pronouns to neutral pronouns
  • 7.Evidence of multiple cycles and lexical renewal in Tundra Nenets
  • 8.Summary: The linguistic cycle
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 13 June 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00003.kis
References (55)
References
Aissen, Judith. 1999. Markedness and subject choice in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 171. 673–711. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Carl. 1995. Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language 711. 63–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caha, Pavel. 2009. The nanosyntax of case. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.
Comrie, Bernard. 1980. Inverse verb forms in Siberia: Evidence from Chukchee, Koryak and Kamchadal. Folia Linguistica Historica 141. 61–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csepregi, Márta. 2017. Surgutskij Dialekt Khantyjskogo Jazyka [The Surgut dialect of Khanty]. Khanty-Mansijsk: Obsko-Ugorskij Institut.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva. 2011. Objects and information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2013. The Inverse Agreement Constraint in Uralic languages. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics 2 (1). 2–21. [URL]
. 2015. A negative cycle in 12th-15th century Hungarian. In Teresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over Time: Lexical, morphological, and information-structural interactions, 86–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The Person–Case Constraint and the Inverse Agreement Constraint. The Linguistic Review 341. 365–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. What determines the varying relation of case and agreement? Evidence from the Ugric languages. Acta Linguistica Academica 67(4). 397–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filchenko, Andrey. 2007. A grammar of Eastern Khanty. Houston: Rice University dissertation.
Gelderen, Elly van. 1996. The emphatic origin of reflexives. Berkeley Linguistics Society 221. 106–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The definiteness cycle in Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19(4). 275–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Cyclical change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The linguistic cycle. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Reflexive pronouns in the Lindisfarne glosses. In Elly van Gelderen (ed.), The Northumbrian Old English glosses [NOWELE 72:2], 220–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1975. Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Charles Li & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Subject and topic, 149–188. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1978. Negation in language. In Peter Cole (ed.), Pragmatics (Syntax & Semantics 9), 69–112. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hajdú, Péter. 1968. Chrestomathia Samoiedica. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
. 1988. Die samojedischen Sprachen [The Samoyedic languages]. In Denis Sinor (ed.), The Uralic languages, 3–40. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hegedűs, Veronika. 2014. The cyclical development of Ps in Hungarian. In É. Kiss, Katalin (ed.), The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax, 122–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Carleton. 1970. The linguistic cycle. Linguistic Sciences 131. 1–7.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1917/1966. Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: A. F. Høst.Google Scholar
Kálmán, Béla. 1976. Chrestomathia Vogulica. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Kavitskaya, Darya & Peter Staroverov. 2008. Opacity in Tundra Nenets. In Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds.), WCCFL 27: Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 274–282. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2008. Universals constrain change, change results in typological generalizations. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 23–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Towards a null theory of the passive. Lingua 1251. 7–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund. 2000. Intensifiers and reflexives: A typological perspective. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci Curl (eds.), Reflexives: Forms and functions, 41–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kulonen, Ulla-Maija. 1989. The passive in Ob-Ugrian (MSFOu 203). Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Kulonen, Ulla Maija. 2007. Itämansin kielioppi ja tekstejä [Eastern Mansi grammar and texts]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Kuznecova, Ariadna I., Evgenij A. Xelimskij & Elena V. Gruškina 1980. Očerki po selʹkupskomu jazyku (tazovskij dialekt) [Essays on the Selkup language (Taz dialect)]. Moskva: MGU.Google Scholar
Labanauskas, Kazis I. 1995. Neneckij folʹklor: Mify, skazki, istoričeskie predanija [Nenets folklore: myths, tales, legends]. Krasnojarsk: Krasnojárskoe knížnoe izdátelʹstvo.Google Scholar
Lehtisalo, Toivo V. 1939. Eräästä ostjakkisamojedin refleksiivipronominista [On a reflexive pronoun in Ostyak-Samoyed]. Virittäjä 431. 113–115.Google Scholar
Majtinskaja, Klara E. 1964. Mestoimenija v mordovskix i marijskix jazykax [Pronouns in the Mordvin and Mari languages]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 1974. Object-verb agreement. Working Papers on Language Universals 151. Stanford: Committee on Linguistics.Google Scholar
Moyne, John A. 1971. Reflexive and emphatic. Language 471. 141–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick. 2001. Deconstructing grammaticalization. Language Sciences 231. 18–229.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina. 1995. Obdorskij dialekt xantyjskogo jazyka [The Obdorsk dialect of the Khanty language] (Mitteilungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica, Heft 15). Hamburg: Societas Uralo-Altaica.Google Scholar
. 1999. Ostyak. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
. 2001. Secondary topic as a relation in information structure. Linguistics 391. 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. A grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puškarëva, Elena T. & Xomič, Ljudmila V. 2001. Folʹklor nencev [Nenets folklore]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar
Riese, Timothy. 2001. Vogul. Languages of the World/Materials 158. München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1970. Declarative sentences. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 222–272. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Salminen, Tapani. 1993. On identifying basic vowel distinctions in Tundra Nenets. Finnisch- Ugrische Forschungen 511. 177–187. [URL]
. 1998. Nenets. In Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic languages, 516–547. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter W. & Beata Moskal & Ting Xu & Jungmin Kang & Jonathan D. Bobaljik. 2019. Case and number suppletion in pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 37(3). 1029–1101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staroverov, Peter. 2006. Vowel deletion and stress in Tundra Nenets. In Beáta Gyuris (ed.), Proceedings of the first Central European Student Conference in Linguistics. [URL]
Siegl, Florian. 2008. A note on personal pronouns in Enets and Northern Samoyedic. Linguistica Uralica 44.21. 119–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, Susanna. 2014. Pragmatic object marking in Eastern Mansi. Linguistics 52(2). 391–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Transitivity in Eastern Mansi. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.
Volkova, Anna. 2014. Licensing reflexivity: Unity and variation among selected Uralic languages. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Xelimskij, Evgeniy. 1982. Drevnejšie vengersko-samodijskie jazykovye paralleli: Lingvističeskaja i ètnogenetičeskaja interpretacija [The oldest Hungarian–Samoyedic language parallels: Linguistic and ethnogenetic interpretation]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Burukina, Irina
2023. On the syntax of postpositional phrasesin Mari. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.