Article published In:
Approaches to Hungarian 17: Special issue of the Journal on Uralic Linguistics 1:2 (2022)
Edited by Tamás Halm, Elizabeth Coppock and Balázs Surányi
[Journal of Uralic Linguistics 1:2] 2022
► pp. 181214
Barwise, Jon & Robin Cooper
1983Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 41. 159–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bende-Farkas, Ágnes
2014From A-quantification to D-quantification: Universal quantifiers in the sentence and in the Noun Phrase. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax, 83–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 The semantics of Old Hungarian floating mind ‘all’ . Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on the Structure of Hungarian, ICSH11, Bucharest, June 7. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Borer, Hagit
2005In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brisson, Christine M.
1998Distributivity, maximality and floating quantifiers. New Brunswick: Rutgers University PhD dissertation.
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke
1999The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, 145–233. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1998Reference to kinds across language. Natural Language Semantics 61. 339–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csirmaz, Aniko & Anna Szabolcsi
2012Quantification in Hungarian. In Edward L. Keenan & Denis Paperno (eds.), Handbook of quantifiers in natural language, 399–465. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dékány, Éva K.
2011A profile of the Hungarian DP: The interaction of lexicalization, agreement and linearization with the functional sequence. Tromsø: University of Tromsø PhD dissertation. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Dékány, Éva & Aniko Csirmaz
2018Numerals and quantifiers. In Gábor Alberti & Tibor Laczkó (eds.), Syntax of Hungarian: Nouns and noun phrases, vol. 21, 1044–1150. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Dékány, Éva & Veronika Hegedűs
2015Word order variation in Hungarian PPs. In Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi & Éva Dékány (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian: Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba conference, vol. 141, 95–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1987Collective predicates, distributive predicates and all. In Ann Miller & Zheng-sheng Zhang (eds.), Proceedings of the 1986 Eastern States Conference on linguistics, 97–115. Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. & Belinda Brodie
1984The semantics of “floated” quantifiers in a transformationless grammar. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 31. 75–90.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
1992Az egyszerű mondat szerkezete [The structure of the simple sentence]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan: Mondattan [A structural grammar of Hungarian: Syntax], vol. 11, 79–177. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
2002The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elbourne, Paul D.
2005Situations and individuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob
1960On sense and reference. In Peter Geach & Max Black (eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege, 2nd edn., 56–78. Oxford: Blackwell. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Gil, David
1982Distributive numerals. Los Angeles: University of California PhD dissertation.
2013Distributive numerals. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Groot, Casper de
2017The essives in Hungarian. In Casper de Groot (ed.), Uralic essive and the expression of impermanent state, 325–351. Amsterdam: John Bejnamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gyuris, Beáta
2002The semantics of contrastive topics in Hungarian. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University PhD dissertation.
Hegedűs, Veronika & Éva Dékány
2021The internal syntax of PPs. In Katalin É. Kiss, Veronika Hegedűs, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver & István Kenesei (eds.), Syntax of Hungarian: Postpositions and postpositional phrases, 193–250. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene
1982The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs. Amherst: University of Massachusetts PhD dissertation.
Heusinger, Klaus von
2002Reference and representation of pronouns. In Horst J. Simon & Heike Wiese (eds.), Pronouns: Representation and grammar, 109–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofweber, Thomas
2005Number determiners, numbers, and arithmetic. The Philosophical Review 1141. 179–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhn, Georg F. K.
2017Non-possessive person in the nominal domain. Cambridge: University of Cambridge PhD dissertation.
2020The third person gap in adnominal pronoun constructions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 51. Article 69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania & Ora Matushansky
2006The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics 231. 315–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Cardinals: The syntax and semantics of cardinal-containing expressions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenesei, István, Robert M. Vago & Anna Fenyvesi
2000Hungarian. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1989Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and contextual expression, 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical matters, 29–52. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Landman, Fred
1989aGroups, I. Linguistics and Philosophy 121. 559–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989bGroups, II. Linguistics and Philosophy 121. 723–744. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991Structures for semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Events and plurality: The Jerusalem lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Predicate-argument mismatches and the adjectival theory of indefinites. In Martine Coene & Yves D’hulst (eds.), From NP to DP: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases, vol. 11, 211–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Indefinites and the type of sets. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Boolean pragmatics. In Jaap van der Does & C. Dutlih Novaes (eds.), ‘This is not a Festschrift’: A Festschrift for Martin Stokhof. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Lasersohn, Peter
1995Plurality, conjunction and events. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lengyel, Klára
2000A melléknév [The adjective]. In Borbála Keszler (ed.), Magyar grammatika [Hungarian grammar], 142–151. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Link, Godehard
1983The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In Rainer Bauerle, Christoph Schwartze & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, use and the interpretation of language, 302–323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
1994Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 251. 609–665.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Guiseppe
2005Toward a unified grammar of reference. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 241. 5–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan M.
1976Notes on quantifier-postposing. Linguistic Inquiry 71. 708–718.Google Scholar
Marácz, László
1986Dressed or naked: The case of the PP in Hungarian. In Abraham Werner & Sjaak de Meij (eds.), Topic, focus and configurationality: Papers from the 6th Groningen Grammar Talks, Groningen 1984, 223–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matushansky, Ora
2006Why Rose is the Rose: On the use of definite articles in proper names. Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 61. 285–308. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
2008On the linguistic complexity of proper names. Linguistics and Philosophy 311. 573–627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oravecz, Csaba, Tamás Váradi & Bálint Sass
2014The Hungarian Gigaword Corpus. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Hrafn Loftsson, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), 1719–1723. Reykjavik: ELRA. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Peredy, Márta
2010Nincs van [No copula in 3sg]. In Zsuzsanna Gécseg (ed.), LingDok 9. Nyelvész-doktoranduszok dolgozatai, 145–172. Szeged: JATE Press.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M.
1974On raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian
2005Pronouns are determiners after all. In Marcel den Dikken & Christina M. Tortora (eds.), The function of function words and functional categories, 251–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Susan
2009Individuating and measure readings of classifier constructions: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 11. 106–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Numericals: Counting, measuring and classifying. Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung 161. 527–542. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
2017Semantics for counting and measuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schvarcz, Brigitta R.
2014The Hungarians who say -nyi: Issues in counting and measuring in Hungarian. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University MA thesis.
2022Nouns, numbers and classifiers in Hungarian. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University PhD dissertation.
Schwarzschild, Roger
2011Stubborn distributivity, multiparticipant nouns and the count/mass distinction. In Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin & Brian Smith (eds.), NELS 39: Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 661–678. Amherst: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Sharvy, Richard
1980A more general theory of definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review 891. 607–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, Eszter & Bálint Sass
2012Nyelvtechnológia és kulturális örökség, avagy korpuszépítés ómagyar kódexekből [Language technology and cultural heritage, or, corpus building from Old Hungarian codices]. Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok XXIV1. 243–264. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Szőke, Bernadett
2015Az értelmezős szerkezetek vizsgálata a magyar nyelvben [Exploring appositive constructions in Hungarian]. Szeged: University of Szeged PhD dissertation. DOI logo
2018Appositive constructions. In Gábor Alberti & Tibor Laczkó (eds.), Syntax of Hungarian: Nouns and Noun Phrases, vol 21, 896–932. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Tompa, József
1968Ungarische Grammatik [Hungarian grammar]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wohlmuth, Kata
2019Atomicity and distributive reference. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra PhD dissertation.
Zweig, Eytan
2006Nouns and adjectives in numeral NPs. In Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds.), NELS 35: Proceedings ofthe 35th conference of the North East Linguistic Society, 663–675. Amerst: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar