Article published In:
Approaches to Hungarian 17: Special issue of the Journal on Uralic Linguistics 1:2 (2022)
Edited by Tamás Halm, Elizabeth Coppock and Balázs Surányi
[Journal of Uralic Linguistics 1:2] 2022
► pp. 215238
Abaffy, Erzsébet
1991Az ikes ragozás kialakulása. A határozott és az általános ragozás elkülönülése [The emergence of the ik-conjugation: The separation of the definite and the general conjugations]. In Loránd Benkő, Erzsébet E. Abaffy & Endre Rácz (eds.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana. A korai ómagyar kor és előzményei [A historical grammar of Hungarian: Early Old Hungarian and its antecedents], 125–139. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
1992Az igei személyragozás [Verbal conjugation]. In Loránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana. A kései ómagyar kor: Morfematika [A historical grammar of Hungarian: The morphology of Late Old Hungarian], 184–238. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer
2015External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark
1988Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Balázs, Géza
2001Magyar nyelvhelyességi lexikon [A lexicon of correct Hungarian]. Budapest: Corvina.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis
1984On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
De la Mora, Juliana
2011A quantitative approach to variable se-marking in Spanish ingestive verbs. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.
Dikken, Marcel den
2006Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Raising the subject of the ‘object-of’ relation. In Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds.), 50 years later: Reflections on Chomsky’s Aspects. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 771. 85–98.Google Scholar
2018An integrated perspective on Hungarian nominal and verbal inflection. In Huba Bartos, Marcel den Dikken, Zoltán Bánréti & Tamás Váradi (eds.), Boundaries crossed, at the crossroads of morphosyntax, phonology, pragmatics and semantics, 147–162. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020Canonical and reverse predication in the syntax of the active/passive diathesis alternation. In Adriana Belletti & Christopher Collins (eds.), Smuggling in syntax, 147–187. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den & Éva Dékány
2019Passives that look like causatives – Causatives that read like passives: caus+se=pass . Paper presented at the 12th SinFonIJA conference, Masaryk University, Brno, 14 September 2019. Ms., RIL.
Doron, Edit & Malka Rappaport Hovav
2007Towards a uniform theory of valence-changing operations. Proceedings of IATL 23 1. 2–20.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
1998The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2018Possessive agreement turned into a derivational suffix. In Huba Bartos, Marcel den Dikken, Zoltán Bánréti & Tamás Váradi (eds.), Boundaries crossed, at the interfaces of morphosyntax, phonology, pragmatics and semantics, 87–105. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Janet Dean
2017Ambiguity, parsing, and the evaluation measure. Language Acquisition 241. 85–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & S. Jay Keyser
1993Argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & S. Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20 1, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Havas, Ferenc
2004Objective conjugation and medialisation. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 511. 95–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence
2008‘I love me some him’: The landscape of non-argument datives. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 71. 169–192. [URL]
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1975French syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krejci, Bonnie
2012Causativization as antireflexivization: A study of middle and ingestive verbs. MA thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
Márkus, Andrea
2015Taming the Hungarian (in)transitivity zoo. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Mészöly, Gedeon
1941Az ikes ragozás -ik ragjának eredete [The origin of the -ik suffix in the ik-conjugation]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 511. 1–13.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir
2007Polysemy of reciprocal markers. In Vladimir Nedjalkov (ed.), Reciprocal constructions, 231–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, John
(ed.) 2009The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka
2014Lexical content and context: The causative alternation in English revisited. Lingua 1411. 8–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Eric Reuland
1993Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 241. 657–720.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni
2005The lexicon–syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 361. 389–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Resenes, Mariana & Marcel den Dikken
2012Semi-clefts as a window on the syntax of predication and the ‘object of’ relation. In Proceedings of CLS 48 1. 519–33. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Sárosi, Zsófia
2003Morfématörténet [Historical morphology]. In Jenő Kiss & Ferenc Pusztai (eds.), Magyar nyelvtörténet [The history of Hungarian], 129–172. Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2017Romance and Greek medio-passives and the typology of Voice. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sleeman, Ruby
2017Ordinal numerals in dialects of Dutch. MA thesis, University of Leiden.
Sportiche, Dominique
2014Assessing unaccusativity and reflexivity: Using focus alternatives to decide what gets which θ-role. Linguistic Inquiry 451. 305–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar