Cover not available
Article published In:
Approaches to Hungarian 17: Special issue of the Journal on Uralic Linguistics 1:2 (2022)
Edited by Tamás Halm, Elizabeth Coppock and Balázs Surányi
[Journal of Uralic Linguistics 1:2] 2022
► pp. 215–238

Ordinals, reflexives and unaccusatives

Unification by predication

ORCID logo | Eötvös Loránd University , Hungary | Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics

This paper presents a unified outlook on the syntax of constructions featuring the reflexive clitic se, with particular emphasis on the uniform morphosyntax of the Hungarian element -ik, treated as an exponent of se both in the verbal domain and in the nominal domain (in ordinal numeral constructions). The analysis is couched in the syntax of predication proposed in Den Dikken (2006), with se represented as the subject of a reverse predication.

Keywords: ordinals, reflexives, unaccusatives, predication, reflexive clitic se , -ik
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. se in the nominal domain: Ordinals
    • 2.1Dutch
    • 2.2Hungarian
  • 3. se in the verbal domain (i): Reflexive and unaccusative verbs
    • 3.1 -ik and person
    • 3.2 -ik and tense, mood
    • 3.3 -ik and -gAt, -hAt
    • 3.4 -ik and -Ód, -ul
  • 4. se in the verbal domain (ii): Transitive and unergative verbs
    • 4.1 -ik and transitive verbs of ingestion
    • 4.2 -ik and unergative activity verbs
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 17 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00010.dik
References
Abaffy, Erzsébet
1991 Az ikes ragozás kialakulása. A határozott és az általános ragozás elkülönülése [The emergence of the ik-conjugation: The separation of the definite and the general conjugations]. In Loránd Benkő, Erzsébet E. Abaffy & Endre Rácz (eds.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana. A korai ómagyar kor és előzményei [A historical grammar of Hungarian: Early Old Hungarian and its antecedents], 125–139. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
1992 Az igei személyragozás [Verbal conjugation]. In Loránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana. A kései ómagyar kor: Morfematika [A historical grammar of Hungarian: The morphology of Late Old Hungarian], 184–238. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer
2015 External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark
1988 Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Balázs, Géza
2001 Magyar nyelvhelyességi lexikon [A lexicon of correct Hungarian]. Budapest: Corvina.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis
1984 On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
De la Mora, Juliana
2011 A quantitative approach to variable se-marking in Spanish ingestive verbs. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.
Dikken, Marcel den
2006 Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Raising the subject of the ‘object-of’ relation. In Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds.), 50 years later: Reflections on Chomsky’s Aspects. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 771. 85–98.Google Scholar
2018 An integrated perspective on Hungarian nominal and verbal inflection. In Huba Bartos, Marcel den Dikken, Zoltán Bánréti & Tamás Váradi (eds.), Boundaries crossed, at the crossroads of morphosyntax, phonology, pragmatics and semantics, 147–162. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 Canonical and reverse predication in the syntax of the active/passive diathesis alternation. In Adriana Belletti & Christopher Collins (eds.), Smuggling in syntax, 147–187. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den & Éva Dékány
2019 Passives that look like causatives – Causatives that read like passives: caus+se=pass . Paper presented at the 12th SinFonIJA conference, Masaryk University, Brno, 14 September 2019. Ms., RIL.
Doron, Edit & Malka Rappaport Hovav
2007 Towards a uniform theory of valence-changing operations. Proceedings of IATL 23 1. 2–20.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
1998 The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2018 Possessive agreement turned into a derivational suffix. In Huba Bartos, Marcel den Dikken, Zoltán Bánréti & Tamás Váradi (eds.), Boundaries crossed, at the interfaces of morphosyntax, phonology, pragmatics and semantics, 87–105. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Janet Dean
2017 Ambiguity, parsing, and the evaluation measure. Language Acquisition 241. 85–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & S. Jay Keyser
1993 Argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & S. Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20 1, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Havas, Ferenc
2004 Objective conjugation and medialisation. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 511. 95–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence
2008 ‘I love me some him’: The landscape of non-argument datives. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 71. 169–192. [URL]
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum
2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1975 French syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994 The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krejci, Bonnie
2012 Causativization as antireflexivization: A study of middle and ingestive verbs. MA thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
Márkus, Andrea
2015 Taming the Hungarian (in)transitivity zoo. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Mészöly, Gedeon
1941 Az ikes ragozás -ik ragjának eredete [The origin of the -ik suffix in the ik-conjugation]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 511. 1–13.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir
2007 Polysemy of reciprocal markers. In Vladimir Nedjalkov (ed.), Reciprocal constructions, 231–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, John
(ed.) 2009 The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka
2014 Lexical content and context: The causative alternation in English revisited. Lingua 1411. 8–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Eric Reuland
1993 Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 241. 657–720.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni
2005 The lexicon–syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 361. 389–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Resenes, Mariana & Marcel den Dikken
2012 Semi-clefts as a window on the syntax of predication and the ‘object of’ relation. In Proceedings of CLS 48 1. 519–33. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Sárosi, Zsófia
2003 Morfématörténet [Historical morphology]. In Jenő Kiss & Ferenc Pusztai (eds.), Magyar nyelvtörténet [The history of Hungarian], 129–172. Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2017 Romance and Greek medio-passives and the typology of Voice. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sleeman, Ruby
2017 Ordinal numerals in dialects of Dutch. MA thesis, University of Leiden.
Sportiche, Dominique
2014 Assessing unaccusativity and reflexivity: Using focus alternatives to decide what gets which θ-role. Linguistic Inquiry 451. 305–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar