Production and perception of voicing contrast in assimilation contexts in
Hungarian
This paper explores to what extent lexical factors, such as minimal pairhood and wordedness, affect the
realisation of laryngeal features of the word-final fricatives /s/ and /z/ in Hungarian in potentially neutralising contexts, and
whether the observed acoustic differences are perceptually salient enough to distinguish underlying voicing in non-minimal pairs
and in minimal pairs in semantically ambiguous contexts. We show that in devoicing contexts the contrast between /s/ and /z/ in
minimal pairs is more likely to be upheld than in non-minimal pairs in production, and this difference seems to map onto
perceptual contrast, also that complete neutralisation can be prevented in devoicing contexts by durational cues. In the voicing
environment, the acoustic difference between the fricatives is less likely to map onto a contrast in perception, indicating
neutralisation. In the devoicing context, little voicing is enough to categorise the fricative as voiced: listeners compensate for
phonological changes that correspond to existing rules in their language rather than for those that are only coarticulatory in
nature.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Voicing contrast and voicing assimilation in Hungarian
- 2.1Regressive voicing assimilation in Hungarian
- 2.2Homophony and production
- 3.Categorisation and neutralisation in perception
- 4.Production experiments
- 4.1Subjects, material, method
- 4.2Results
- 4.2.1Absolute word-final position
- 4.2.2Before /p/
- 4.2.3Before /b/
- 4.2.4Before sonorants
- 5.Perception experiments
- 5.1Minimal pairs in absolute word-final position
- 5.2Minimal pairs in voicing assimilatory contexts
- 5.3Non-minimal pairs in voicing assimilatory contexts
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1Minimal pairs in speech production
- 6.2Do you hear the voice?
- 6.3Mapping production and perception
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (68)
References
Baese-Berk, Melissa & Matthew Goldrick. 2009. Mechanisms
of interaction in speech production. Language and Cognitive
Processes 241. 527–554.
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss. 2019. A fonetikai korrelátumok szerepe a zöngekontraszt fenntartásában. Beszédprodukciós és észleléses
eredmények [The role of phonetic correlates in voicing contrast. Results
from speech production and perception]. Általános Nyelvészeti
Tanulmányok 311. 57–102.
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss. 2021. The
perception of voicing contrast in assimilation contexts in minimal pairs: Evidence from
Hungarian. Acta Linguistica
Academica 681. 207–229.
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Katalin Mády. 2012. The
perception of voicing in fricatives. Paper presented at the 9th
Old World Conference in Phonology, Berlin, 18–21 January
2012.
Bartoń, Kamil. 2020. MuMIn:
Multi-model inference. [URL]. R package version 1.43.17.
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting
linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical
Software 671. 1–48.
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steven Walker. 2021. lme4:
Linear mixed-effects models using ‘eigen’ and S4. [URL]. R package
version 1.4–00.
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2021. Praat:
Doing phonetics by computer. ([URL])
Bolker, Ben & David Robinson. 2021. Broom.mixed:
Tidying methods for mixed
models. [URL]. R package
version 0.2.7.
Charles-Luce, Jan. 1993. The
effects of semantic context on voicing
neutralization. Phonetica 501. 28–43.
Costa, Paul & Ignatius Mattingly. 1981. Production
and perception of phonetic contrast during phonetic change. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR 67/68. 191–196.
Darcy, Isabel, Franck Ramus, Anne Christophe, Katherine Kinzler & Emmanuel Dupoux. 2009. Phonological
knowledge in compensation for native and non-native
assimilation. In Frank Kügler, Caroline Féry & Ruben Vijver (eds.), Variation
and gradience in phonetics and
phonology, 265–309. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Draxler, Christoph & Klaus Jänsch. 2004. SpeechRecorder –
A universal platform independent multi-channel audio recording software. Proceedings of the 4th
International Conference on Language Resources and
Evaluation, 559–562. Lisbon.
G. Kiss, Zoltán. 2013. Measuring
acoustic correlates of voicing in stops and fricatives. In Péter Szigetvári (ed.), VLLXX:
Papers presented to László Varga on his 70th
birthday, 289–311. Budapest: Department of English Linguistics, Eötvös Loránd University & Tinta Könyvkiadó/Tinta Publishing House.
Ganong, William F. 1980. Phonetic categorization in
auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance 61. 110–125.
Garrett, Andrew & Keith Johnson. 2013. Phonetic
bias in sound change. In Alan C. L. Yu (ed.), Origins
of sound change: Approaches to
phonologization, 51–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gilliéron, Jules. 1910. Étude
de géographie linguistique XII – mots en collision. Le coq et le
chat
. Revue de philologie
française 41. 278–288.
Goldrick, Matthew, Charlotte Vaughn & Amanda Murphy. 2013. The
effects of lexical neighbours on stop consonant articulation. The Journal of the Acoustical
Society of America 1341. 172–177.
Gráczi, Tekla Etelka. 2010. A spiránsok
zöngésségi oppozíciójának néhány jellemzője [Some properties of the voicing
opposition of spirants]. Beszédkutatás
2010, 42–56.
Hanson, Helen M., Richard S. McGowan, Kenneth N. Stevens & Robert E. Beaudoin. 1999. Development
of rules for controlling the HLSyn speech synthesizer. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal
Processing. Proceedings, vol. 1. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal
Processing, 85–88.
Harrington, Jonathan, Felicitas Kleber & Ulrich Reubold. 2012. The
production and perception of coarticulation in two types of sound changes in
progress. In Susanne Fuchs, Melanie Weirich, Daniel Pape & Pascal Perrier (eds.), Speech
planning and dynamics, 39–62. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Harris, John. 1994. English
sound structure. Oxford & Cambridge MA: Blackwell.
Hestvik, Arild & Karthik Durvasula. 2016. Neurobiological
evidence for voicing underspecification in English. Brain and
Language 1521. 28–43.
Hwang, So-One K., Philip J. Mohanan & William J. Idsardi. 2010. Underspecification
and asymmetries in voicing
perception. Phonology 271. 205–224.
Jansen, Wouter. 2004. Laryngeal
contrast and phonetic voicing: A laboratory phonology approach to English, Hungarian, and
Dutch. Doctoral dissertation. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Jansen, Wouter. 2007. Phonological
‘voicing’, phonetic voicing and assimilation in English. Language
Sciences 291. 270–293.
Janson, Tore. 1983. Sound
change in perception and
production. Language 591. 18–34.
Javkin, Hector R. 1976. The perceptual basis of vowel
duration differences associated with the voiced/voiceless distinction. Report of the Phonology
Laboratory, UC
Berkeley 11. 78–92.
Kharlamov, Viktor. 2014. Incomplete
neutralisation of the voicing contrast in word-final obstruents in Russian: Phonological, lexical, and methodological
influences. Journal of
Phonetics 431. 47–56.
Kingston, John & Randy L. Diehl. 1994. Phonetic
knowledge. Language 701. 419–454.
Kitahara, Mafuyu, Keiichi Tajima & Kiyoko Yoneyama. 2019. The
effect of lexical competition on realization of phonetic contrasts: A corpus study of the voicing contrast in
Japanese. In: Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings
of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic
Sciences, 2749–2752. Melbourne, Australia.
Kleber, Felicitas, Jonathan Harrington & Ulrich Reubold. 2012. The
relationship between the perception and production of coarticulation during a sound change in
progress. Language and
Speech 551. 383–405.
Kluender, Keith R., Randy L. Diehl & Beverly A. Wright. 1988. Vowel
length differences before voiced and voiceless consonants: An auditory explanation. Journal of
Phonetics 161. 153–169.
Kulikov, Vladimir. 2022. Voice
and emphasis in Arabic coronal stops: Evidence for phonological compensation. Language and
Speech 651. 73–104.
Kuzla, Claudia, Mirjam Ernestus & Holger Mitterer. 2010. Compensation
for assimilatory devoicing and prosodic structure in German fricative
perception. In Cécile Fougeron, Barbara Kühnert, Mariapaola D’Imperio & Nathalie Vallée (eds.), Laboratory
phonology
10
1, 731–757. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter Mouton.
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest
package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical
Software 821. 1–26.
Lindblom, Björn. 1990. Explaining
phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In: William J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech
production and speech
modeling, 403–440. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lisker, Leigh & Arthur Abramson. 1964. A
cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical
measurements. Word 201. 384–422.
Lisker, Leigh & Arthur Abramson. 1967. Some
effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and
Speech 101. 1–28.
Luce, Paul A. & David B. Pisoni. 1998. Recognizing
spoken words: The neighbourhood activation model. Ear and
Hearing 191. 1–36.
Makowski, Dominique, Mattan S. Ben-Shachar, Indrajeet Patil & Daniel Lüdecke. 2021. Automated
results reporting as a practical tool to improve reproducibility and methodological best practices adoption, v. 0.5.0.
CRAN. [URL]
Manuel, Sharon Y. 1990. The role of contrast in limiting
vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America 881. 1286–1298.
Martinet, André. 1952. Function,
structure, and sound
change. Word 81. 1–32.
Massaro, Dominic W. & Michael M. Cohen. 1983. Consonant/vowel
ratio: An improbable cue in speech perception. Perception and
Psychophysics 331. 502–505.
Munteanu, Andrei. 2021. Homophony
avoidance in the grammar: Russian nominal
allomorphy. Phonology 381. 401–435.
Myers, Scott. 2012. Final
devoicing: Production and perception studies. In: Tony Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara & Mariko Sugahara (eds.), Prosody
matters: Essays in honor of Elisabeth
Selkirk, 148–180. London: Equinox Press.
Newman, Rochelle S. 2003. Using links between speech
perception and speech production to evaluate different acoustic metrics: A preliminary
report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America 1131. 2850–2860.
Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of
sound change. In: Carrie S. Masek, Roberta A. Hendrik & Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Papers
from the Parasession on Language and Behaviour conference (CLS
17), 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Parker, Ellen M., Randy L. Diehl & Keith R. Kluender. 1986. Trading
relations in speech and non-speech. Perception and
Psychophysics 391. 129–142.
Pedersen, Thomas Lin. 2020. Patchwork: The composer of
plots. [URL]. R package version 1.1.0.
Pinget, Anne-France, René Kager & Hans van de Velde. 2020. Linking
variation in perception and production in sound change: Evidence from Dutch obstruent
devoicing. Language and
Speech 631. 660–685.
Port, Robert F. & Jonathan Dalby. 1982. C/V
ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception and
Psychophysics 21. 141–152.
Port, Robert F. & Adam P. Leary. 2005. Against
formal
phonology. Language 811. 927–964.
R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and
environment for statistical computing; 4.0.2. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical
Computing. [URL]
Shultz, Amanda A., Alexander L. Francis & Fernando Llanos. 2012. Differential
cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical
Society of
America 1321. EL95–EL101.
Silverman, Daniel. 2012. Neutralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy. 2000. The
phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Snoeren, Natalie D., Pierre A. Hallé & Juan Segui. 2006. A
voice for the voiceless: Production and perception of assimilated stops in French. Journal of
Phonetics 341. 241–268.
Snoeren, Natalie D., Juan Segui and Pierre A. Hallé. 2008. On
the role of regular phonological variation in lexical access: Evidence from voice assimilation in
French. Cognition 1081. 512–521.
Steriade, Donca. 1997. Phonetics
in phonology: The case of laryngeal
neutralization. Manuscript. University of California Los Angeles.
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1998. Acoustic
phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wedel, Andrew, Abby Kaplan & Scott Jackson. 2013. High
functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: A corpus
study. Cognition 1281. 179–86.
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English
1–3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wickham, Hadley, Mara Averick, Jennifer Bryan, Winston Chang, Lucy D’Agostino McGowan, Romain François, Garrett Grolemund et al. 2019. Welcome
to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source
Software 41. 1686.
Yin, Sora Heng & James White. 2018. Neutralization
and homophony avoidance in phonological
learning. Cognition 1791. 89–101.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2024.
Learning and unlearning voicing assimilation.
Frontiers in Language Sciences 2
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.