Article published In:
Approaches to Hungarian 18: Special issue of the Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:1 (2023)
Edited by Donka F. Farkas, Gábor Alberti and Balázs Surányi
[Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:1] 2023
► pp. 549
References (68)
References
Baese-Berk, Melissa & Matthew Goldrick. 2009. Mechanisms of interaction in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes 241. 527–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss. 2015. Why do sonorants not voice in Hungarian? And why do they voice in Slovak? In Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi & Éva Dékány (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 14: Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba conference, 65–94. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. A fonetikai korrelátumok szerepe a zöngekontraszt fenntartásában. Beszédprodukciós és észleléses eredmények [The role of phonetic correlates in voicing contrast. Results from speech production and perception]. Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok 311. 57–102.Google Scholar
. 2020. Neutralisation and contrast preservation: Voicing assimilation in Hungarian three-consonant clusters. Linguistic Variation 201. 56–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. The perception of voicing contrast in assimilation contexts in minimal pairs: Evidence from Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Academica 681. 207–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Katalin Mády. 2012. The perception of voicing in fricatives. Paper presented at the 9th Old World Conference in Phonology, Berlin, 18–21 January 2012.
Bartoń, Kamil. 2020. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. [URL]. R package version 1.43.17.
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 671. 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steven Walker. 2021. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using ‘eigen’ and S4. [URL]. R package version 1.4–00.
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2021. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. ([URL])
Bolker, Ben & David Robinson. 2021. Broom.mixed: Tidying methods for mixed models. [URL]. R package version 0.2.7.Google Scholar
Charles-Luce, Jan. 1993. The effects of semantic context on voicing neutralization. Phonetica 501. 28–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, Paul & Ignatius Mattingly. 1981. Production and perception of phonetic contrast during phonetic change. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR 67/68. 191–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darcy, Isabel, Franck Ramus, Anne Christophe, Katherine Kinzler & Emmanuel Dupoux. 2009. Phonological knowledge in compensation for native and non-native assimilation. In Frank Kügler, Caroline Féry & Ruben Vijver (eds.), Variation and gradience in phonetics and phonology, 265–309. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Draxler, Christoph & Klaus Jänsch. 2004. SpeechRecorder – A universal platform independent multi-channel audio recording software. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 559–562. Lisbon.Google Scholar
G. Kiss, Zoltán. 2013. Measuring acoustic correlates of voicing in stops and fricatives. In Péter Szigetvári (ed.), VLLXX: Papers presented to László Varga on his 70th birthday, 289–311. Budapest: Department of English Linguistics, Eötvös Loránd University & Tinta Könyvkiadó/Tinta Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ganong, William F. 1980. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 61. 110–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Andrew & Keith Johnson. 2013. Phonetic bias in sound change. In Alan C. L. Yu (ed.), Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologization, 51–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules. 1910. Étude de géographie linguistique XII – mots en collision. Le coq et le chat . Revue de philologie française 41. 278–288.Google Scholar
Goldrick, Matthew, Charlotte Vaughn & Amanda Murphy. 2013. The effects of lexical neighbours on stop consonant articulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1341. 172–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gráczi, Tekla Etelka. 2010. A spiránsok zöngésségi oppozíciójának néhány jellemzője [Some properties of the voicing opposition of spirants]. Beszédkutatás 2010, 42–56.Google Scholar
Hanson, Helen M., Richard S. McGowan, Kenneth N. Stevens & Robert E. Beaudoin. 1999. Development of rules for controlling the HLSyn speech synthesizer. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings, vol. 1. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 85–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Felicitas Kleber & Ulrich Reubold. 2012. The production and perception of coarticulation in two types of sound changes in progress. In Susanne Fuchs, Melanie Weirich, Daniel Pape & Pascal Perrier (eds.), Speech planning and dynamics, 39–62. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Harris, John. 1994. English sound structure. Oxford & Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hestvik, Arild & Karthik Durvasula. 2016. Neurobiological evidence for voicing underspecification in English. Brain and Language 1521. 28–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hwang, So-One K., Philip J. Mohanan & William J. Idsardi. 2010. Underspecification and asymmetries in voicing perception. Phonology 271. 205–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Wouter. 2004. Laryngeal contrast and phonetic voicing: A laboratory phonology approach to English, Hungarian, and Dutch. Doctoral dissertation. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
. 2007. Phonological ‘voicing’, phonetic voicing and assimilation in English. Language Sciences 291. 270–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janson, Tore. 1983. Sound change in perception and production. Language 591. 18–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Javkin, Hector R. 1976. The perceptual basis of vowel duration differences associated with the voiced/voiceless distinction. Report of the Phonology Laboratory, UC Berkeley 11. 78–92.Google Scholar
Kharlamov, Viktor. 2014. Incomplete neutralisation of the voicing contrast in word-final obstruents in Russian: Phonological, lexical, and methodological influences. Journal of Phonetics 431. 47–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John & Randy L. Diehl. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 701. 419–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitahara, Mafuyu, Keiichi Tajima & Kiyoko Yoneyama. 2019. The effect of lexical competition on realization of phonetic contrasts: A corpus study of the voicing contrast in Japanese. In: Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2749–2752. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Kleber, Felicitas, Jonathan Harrington & Ulrich Reubold. 2012. The relationship between the perception and production of coarticulation during a sound change in progress. Language and Speech 551. 383–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluender, Keith R., Randy L. Diehl & Beverly A. Wright. 1988. Vowel length differences before voiced and voiceless consonants: An auditory explanation. Journal of Phonetics 161. 153–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Vladimir. 2022. Voice and emphasis in Arabic coronal stops: Evidence for phonological compensation. Language and Speech 651. 73–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzla, Claudia, Mirjam Ernestus & Holger Mitterer. 2010. Compensation for assimilatory devoicing and prosodic structure in German fricative perception. In Cécile Fougeron, Barbara Kühnert, Mariapaola D’Imperio & Nathalie Vallée (eds.), Laboratory phonology 10 1, 731–757. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 821. 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Björn. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In: William J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modeling, 403–440. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lisker, Leigh & Arthur Abramson. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 201. 384–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1967. Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech 101. 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luce, Paul A. & David B. Pisoni. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The neighbourhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 191. 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makowski, Dominique, Mattan S. Ben-Shachar, Indrajeet Patil & Daniel Lüdecke. 2021. Automated results reporting as a practical tool to improve reproducibility and methodological best practices adoption, v. 0.5.0. CRAN. [URL]
Manuel, Sharon Y. 1990. The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 881. 1286–1298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André. 1952. Function, structure, and sound change. Word 81. 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massaro, Dominic W. & Michael M. Cohen. 1983. Consonant/vowel ratio: An improbable cue in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics 331. 502–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munteanu, Andrei. 2021. Homophony avoidance in the grammar: Russian nominal allomorphy. Phonology 381. 401–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, Scott. 2012. Final devoicing: Production and perception studies. In: Tony Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara & Mariko Sugahara (eds.), Prosody matters: Essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk, 148–180. London: Equinox Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Rochelle S. 2003. Using links between speech perception and speech production to evaluate different acoustic metrics: A preliminary report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1131. 2850–2860. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In: Carrie S. Masek, Roberta A. Hendrik & Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behaviour conference (CLS 17), 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Parker, Ellen M., Randy L. Diehl & Keith R. Kluender. 1986. Trading relations in speech and non-speech. Perception and Psychophysics 391. 129–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Thomas Lin. 2020. Patchwork: The composer of plots. [URL]. R package version 1.1.0.
Pinget, Anne-France, René Kager & Hans van de Velde. 2020. Linking variation in perception and production in sound change: Evidence from Dutch obstruent devoicing. Language and Speech 631. 660–685. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Port, Robert F. & Jonathan Dalby. 1982. C/V ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception and Psychophysics 21. 141–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Port, Robert F. & Adam P. Leary. 2005. Against formal phonology. Language 811. 927–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing; 4.0.2. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2013. A counterexample to homophony avoidance. Diachronica 301. 579–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shultz, Amanda A., Alexander L. Francis & Fernando Llanos. 2012. Differential cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1321. EL95–EL101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Daniel. 2012. Neutralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy. 2000. The phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snoeren, Natalie D., Pierre A. Hallé & Juan Segui. 2006. A voice for the voiceless: Production and perception of assimilated stops in French. Journal of Phonetics 341. 241–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snoeren, Natalie D., Juan Segui and Pierre A. Hallé. 2008. On the role of regular phonological variation in lexical access: Evidence from voice assimilation in French. Cognition 1081. 512–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1997. Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. Manuscript. University of California Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1998. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wedel, Andrew, Abby Kaplan & Scott Jackson. 2013. High functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: A corpus study. Cognition 1281. 179–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English 1–3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Hadley, Mara Averick, Jennifer Bryan, Winston Chang, Lucy D’Agostino McGowan, Romain François, Garrett Grolemund et al. 2019. Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software 41. 1686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yin, Sora Heng & James White. 2018. Neutralization and homophony avoidance in phonological learning. Cognition 1791. 89–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2024. Learning and unlearning voicing assimilation. Frontiers in Language Sciences 2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.