Article In:
(Inter)subjectivity across registers of Estonian: Special issue of the Journal of Uralic Linguistics 3:2 (2024)
Edited by Helle Metslang, Tiit Hennoste and Külli Habicht
[Journal of Uralic Linguistics 3:2] 2024
► pp. 265296
References (19)
References
Alumäe, Tanel, Ottokar Tilk & Ullah Asad. 2018. Advanced rich transcription system for Estonian speech. In Kadri Muischnek & Kaili Müürisep (eds.), Human language technologies — the Baltic perspective: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference, Baltic HLT 2018, 1–8. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Amer, Ali A. & Hassan I. Abdalla. 2020. A set theory based similarity measure for text clustering and classification. Journal of Big Data 74 (7). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, genre, and style. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crossley, Scott A. & Max M. Louwerse. 2007. Multi-dimensional register classification using bigrams. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12 (4). 453–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demerau, Fred J. 1975. The use of function word frequencies as indicators of style. Computers and the Humanities 9 (6). 271–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foolen, Ad. 1996. Pragmatic particles. In Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics online. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennoste, Tiit, Gerson Klumpp & Helle Metslang. 2022a. Diskursusemarkerid ja pragmaatika. Sissejuhatuseks [Discourse markers and pragmatics: Introduction]. Keel ja Kirjandus 1–21. 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennoste, Tiit, Külli Prillop, Külli Habicht, Helle Metslang, Kirsi Laanesoo, Liina Pärismaa, Elen Pärt, Andra Rumm, Andriela Rääbis & Carl Eric Simmul. 2022b. Komplementlausega predikaatidel põhinevate diskursusemarkerite kasutus eri registrites [Complement-taking predicate markers in different registers in Estonian]. Keel ja Kirjandus 1–21. 130–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennoste, Tiit, Helle Metslang, Külli Habicht & Külli Prillop. 2021. Kuue (inter)subjektiivsuspartikli kasutus eesti keele registrites [The use of six (inter)subjectivity particles in Estonian registers]. Emakeele Seltsi aastaraamat 66 (1). 91–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennoste, Tiit, Külli Prillop, Külli Habicht, Helle Metslang, Kirsi Laanesoo, David Ogren, Liina Pärismaa, Elen Pärt, Andra Rumm, Andriela Rääbis & Carl Eric Simmul. 2024. Downtoners and intensifiers in different registers: The case of Estonian. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 31. 159–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, Ewa. 2015. Conversational writing: A multidimensional study of synchronous and supersynchronous computer-mediated communication. New York: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olev, Aivo & Tanel Alumäe. 2022. Estonian speech recognition and transcription editing service. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing 10 (3). 409–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paumäe, Pamela & Reili Argus. 2023. Modaalpartiklid jutusaates „Keskpäevatund“ [Modal particles in the talk show ‘Keskpäevatund’]. In Kirsi Laanesoo-Kalk, Mart Velsker & Roosmarii Kurvits (eds.), Kahtlus ja mõttemäss: Pühendusteos Tiit Hennoste 70. sünnipäevaks [A festschrift for Tiit Hennoste’s 70th birthday], 109–122. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli kirjastus.Google Scholar
Pic, Elsa & Grégory Furmaniak. 2012. A study of epistemic modality in academic and popularised discourse: the case of possibility adverbs perhaps, maybe and possibly. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Especificos 181. 13–44. Université Sorbonne Nouvelle. PRES Sorbonne Pris Cite — Primes EA 4398.Google Scholar
Pho, Phuong Dzung. 2012. Authorial stance in research article abstracts and introductions from two disciplines. In Nicole Baumgarten, Inke Du Bois & Juliane House (eds.), Subjectivity in language and in discourse, 97–114. (Studies in Pragmatics 10). Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prillop, Külli, Tiit Hennoste, Külli Habicht & Helle Metslang. 2021. Ei saa me läbi „Pragmaatika“ korpuseta. Korpuspragmaatika ja pragmaatikakorpus [We can’t get by without the pragmatics corpus. Corpus pragmatics and the pragmatics corpus]. Mäetagused 811. 161–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaik, Kristiina, Kairit Sirts & Kadri Muischnek. 2020. Dimensionaalne tekstimudel. Teoreetiline ülevaade [The dimensional text model: A theoretical overview]. Keel ja Kirjandus 101. 875–898. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte. 2011. Discourse particles. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning 21, 2012–2038. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar