This article analyzes the Korean [X-ko iss-ta] construction from the perspective of construal-based semantics, where the speaker’s choice and the grammatical context play an important role. The [X-ko iss-ta] construction exhibits ambiguity between the Progressive and the Resultant meanings. I argue that the Progressive reading is associated with the accomplishment construal of the construction, while the Resultant reading is associated with the achievement construal. I further argue that this type of alternative construal is motivated by the granularity observed ubiquitously in our everyday language. In terms of the function of -ko iss-, I argue that it segments out a smaller portion of the profiled semantic contour for focused viewing — an advantageous perspective from which to analyze stative verbs. My construal-based semantic analysis overcomes difficulties left by the previous proposals on the same topic.
Bickel, Balthasar. 1997. Aspectual scope and the difference between logical and semantic representation. Lingua 102.2/3:115–131.
Binnick, Robert I. 2006. Aspect and aspectuality. The Handbook of English Linguistics ed. by Bas Aarts & April McMahonm, 244–268. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Chung, Taegoo. 2007. Kwuke concay kwumwunuy uymiwa saken kwuco [An event structure approach to the Korean existential construction]. Ene [Korean Journal of Linguistics] 32.4: 779–801.
Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect System. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
de Swart, Henriëtte. 1998. Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16.2: 347–385.
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Han, Dong-Wan. 1999. ‘ko iss’ kwusenguy cwunguysengey tayhaye [On the ambiguity of the ‘-ko iss’ construction]. Hanwuke uymihak [Korean Semantics] 51: 215–248.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johanson, Lars. 1996. Terminality operators and their hierarchical status. Complex Structures: A Functionalist Perspective ed. by Betty Devriendt, Louis Goossens & Johan van der Auwera, 229–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Johanson, Lars. 2000. Viewpoint operators in European languages. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe ed. by Östen Dahl, 27–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kim, Jong-Bok. 2011. Ambiguities in the Korean -KO ISSTA imperfective construction. Korean Journal of Linguistics 36.4: 863–885.
Kim, Min-Joo, 2009. A fresh look at the ambiguity puzzle of KO ISS imperfective in Korean.
Simon Fraser University Working Papers in Linguistics: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on East Asian Linguistics
. [URL] (accessed 30 July 2013).
Kim, Min-Joo. 2011. The imperfect puzzle in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 18 ed. by William McClure & Marcel den Dikken, 266–277. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Kim, Minju. 2011. Grammaticalization in Korean: The Evolution of the Existential Verb. London: Saffron Books.
Kim, Namkil. 1986. The progressive in Korean. Studies in Korean Language and Linguistics ed. by Namkil Kim, 97–117. LA: East Asian Studies Center, USC.
Kwon, Iksoo. 2012. Viewpoints in the Korean Verbal Complex: Evidence, Perception, Assessment, and Time. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lee, EunHee. 2006. Stative progressives in Korean and English. Journal of Pragmatics 38.5: 695–717.
Lee, EunHee. 2008. Argument structure and event structure: the case of Korean imperfective constructions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17.2: 117–139.
Lee, Hyo Sang. 1991. Tense, Aspect, and Modality: A Discourse-pragmatic Analysis of Verbal Affixes in Korean from a Typological Perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Lee, Kee Dong. 1978. Cotongsa isstauy uymi yenkwu [On the semantic nature of the auxiliary iss-ta]. Nwunmoy Huh Wung paksa hwankap nonmwuncip [Essays in Commemorating the 60th Anniversary of Nwunmoy, Dr. Wung Huh] ed. by The Festschrift Committee, 359–387. Seoul, Korea: Kwahaksa.
Lee, Kee Dong. 1993. A Korean Grammar on Semantic-pragmatic principles. Seoul, Korea: Hankwuk Mwunhwasa.
Lee, Nam-Sun. 1981. Hyentay kwukeuy siceywa sangey tayhan yenkwu [Research on tense and aspect of Modern Korean]. Master Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusative: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. MA, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Michaelis, Laura A. 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: an integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15.1: 1–67.
Okuda, Yasuo. 1978a. Asupekuto no kenkyuu o megutte, zyoo [On the study of aspect, I], Kyooiku Kokugo 531: 33–44. Recited from Shirai (1998).
Okuda, Yasuo. 1978b. Asupekuto no kenkyuu o megutte, ge [On the study of aspect, II], Kyooiku Kokugo 541: 14–27. Recited from Shirai (1998).
Park, Yang-Kyu. 1985. Kwukeuy caykwui tongsaey kwanhaye [On Korean reflexive verbs]. Kwukehak [Korean Linguistics] 141: 361–382.
Rhee, Seongha. 1996. Semantics of Verbs and Grammaticalization: The Development in Korean from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Seoul, Korea: Hankwuk Mwunhwasa.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2002. Recent activity in the theory of aspect: Accomplishments, achievements, or just non-progressive state? Linguistic Typology61: 199–271.
Smith, Carlota. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Talmy, Leonard. 1983. How language structures space. Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application ed. by Herbert L. Pick & Linda P. Acredolo, 225–282. New York: Plenum Press.
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Verbs and times. Linguistics in Philosophy ed. by Zeno Vendler, 97–121. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Yang, Jeong-Suk. 2004. ‘-ko iss-’kwa ‘-e iss-’uy sangposeng yepwu kemthowa kwumwun kyuchik kiswul [An examination of the complementary distribution between ‘-ko iss-’ and ‘-a iss-‘ constructions and their rule descriptions]. Hangul [The Korean Writing System] 2661: 105–136.
Wako, Masakazu, Shigeru Sato & Kaoru Horie. 2003. From progressive to perfect: A corpus-based study of the “perfect” meaning of the Korean progressive form. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12 ed. by William McClure, 64–74. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Ogihara, Toshiyuki & Eun-Hae Park
2019. Aspect shift without coercion: continuous causative verbs in Japanese and Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 107 ff.
Chae, Hee-Rahk
2018. The structural ambiguity of the (im)perfective [V-ko iss-] in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 27:4 ► pp. 377 ff.
Chae, Hee-Rahk
2020. Constraints on the Perfective [V-ko (iss-)] in Korean:With Reference to a Present State Reading. Lanaguage Research 56:3 ► pp. 309 ff.
Chae, Hee-Rahk
2020. Constraints on the Perfective [V-ko (iss-)] in Korean:With Reference to a Present State Reading. Lanaguage Research 56:3 ► pp. 309 ff.
서성기
2016. Resultative Readings in -ko issta Construction. Studies in Generative Grammar 26:4 ► pp. 453 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Syntax–Semantics Interface. In Korean, ► pp. 245 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.