Article published in:
Korean Linguistics
Vol. 16:1 (2014) ► pp. 1850
References
Bickel, Balthasar.
1997Aspectual scope and the difference between logical and semantic representation. Lingua 102.2/3:115–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Binnick, Robert I.
2006Aspect and aspectuality. The Handbook of English Linguistics ed. by Bas Aarts & April McMahonm, 244–268. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breu, Walter.
1994Interactions between lexical, temporal, and aspectual meaning. Studies in Language 18.11: 23–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Taegoo.
2007Kwuke concay kwumwunuy uymiwa saken kwuco [An event structure approach to the Korean existential construction]. Ene [Korean Journal of Linguistics] 32.4: 779–801.Google Scholar
Croft, William.
2012Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse.
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen.
1985Tense and Aspect System. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriëtte.
1998Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16.2: 347–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David.
1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, Dong-Wan.
1999‘ko iss’ kwusenguy cwunguysengey tayhaye [On the ambiguity of the ‘-ko iss’ construction]. Hanwuke uymihak [Korean Semantics] 51: 215–248.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott.
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars.
1996Terminality operators and their hierarchical status. Complex Structures: A Functionalist Perspective ed. by Betty Devriendt, Louis Goossens & Johan van der Auwera, 229–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Viewpoint operators in European languages. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe ed. by Östen Dahl, 27–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok.
2011Ambiguities in the Korean -KO ISSTA imperfective construction. Korean Journal of Linguistics 36.4: 863–885. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Min-Joo,
2009A fresh look at the ambiguity puzzle of KO ISS imperfective in Korean. Simon Fraser University Working Papers in Linguistics: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on East Asian Linguistics . http://​webpages​.acs​.ttu​.edu​/minjkim (accessed 30 July 2013).
Kim, Min-Joo.
2011The imperfect puzzle in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 18 ed. by William McClure & Marcel den Dikken, 266–277. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kim, Minju.
2011Grammaticalization in Korean: The Evolution of the Existential Verb. London: Saffron Books.Google Scholar
Kim, Namkil.
1986The progressive in Korean. Studies in Korean Language and Linguistics ed. by Namkil Kim, 97–117. LA: East Asian Studies Center, USC.Google Scholar
Kwon, Iksoo.
2012Viewpoints in the Korean Verbal Complex: Evidence, Perception, Assessment, and Time. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, EunHee.
2006Stative progressives in Korean and English. Journal of Pragmatics 38.5: 695–717. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Argument structure and event structure: the case of Korean imperfective constructions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17.2: 117–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang.
1991Tense, Aspect, and Modality: A Discourse-pragmatic Analysis of Verbal Affixes in Korean from a Typological Perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lee, Kee Dong.
1978 Cotongsa isstauy uymi yenkwu [On the semantic nature of the auxiliary iss-ta]. Nwunmoy Huh Wung paksa hwankap nonmwuncip [Essays in Commemorating the 60th Anniversary of Nwunmoy, Dr. Wung Huh] ed. by The Festschrift Committee, 359–387. Seoul, Korea: Kwahaksa.Google Scholar
1993A Korean Grammar on Semantic-pragmatic principles. Seoul, Korea: Hankwuk Mwunhwasa.Google Scholar
Lee, Nam-Sun.
1981Hyentay kwukeuy siceywa sangey tayhan yenkwu [Research on tense and aspect of Modern Korean]. Master Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav.
1995Unaccusative: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. MA, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A.
2004Type shifting in construction grammar: an integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15.1: 1–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Okuda, Yasuo.
1978aAsupekuto no kenkyuu o megutte, zyoo [On the study of aspect, I], Kyooiku Kokugo 531: 33–44. Recited from Shirai (1998).Google Scholar
1978bAsupekuto no kenkyuu o megutte, ge [On the study of aspect, II], Kyooiku Kokugo 541: 14–27. Recited from Shirai (1998).Google Scholar
Park, Yang-Kyu.
1985Kwukeuy caykwui tongsaey kwanhaye [On Korean reflexive verbs]. Kwukehak [Korean Linguistics] 141: 361–382.Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha.
1996Semantics of Verbs and Grammaticalization: The Development in Korean from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Seoul, Korea: Hankwuk Mwunhwasa.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen.
2002Recent activity in the theory of aspect: Accomplishments, achievements, or just non-progressive state? Linguistic Typology61: 199–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Yasuhiro,
1998Where the progressive and the resultative meet: imperfective aspect in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and English. Studies in Language 22.3: 661–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota.
1991The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard.
1983How language structures space. Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application ed. by Herbert L. Pick & Linda P. Acredolo, 225–282. New York: Plenum Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno.
1967Verbs and times. Linguistics in Philosophy ed. by Zeno Vendler, 97–121. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Jeong-Suk.
2004‘-ko iss-’kwa ‘-e iss-’uy sangposeng yepwu kemthowa kwumwun kyuchik kiswul [An examination of the complementary distribution between ‘-ko iss-’ and ‘-a iss-‘ constructions and their rule descriptions]. Hangul [The Korean Writing System] 2661: 105–136.Google Scholar
Wako, Masakazu, Shigeru Sato & Kaoru Horie.
2003From progressive to perfect: A corpus-based study of the “perfect” meaning of the Korean progressive form. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12 ed. by William McClure, 64–74. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

No author info given
2019.  In Korean,  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
Chae, Hee-Rahk
2018. The structural ambiguity of the (im)perfective [V-ko iss-] in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 27:4  pp. 377 ff. Crossref logo
Chae, Hee-Rahk
2020. Constraints on the Perfective [V-ko (iss-)] in Korean:With Reference to a Present State Reading. Lanaguage Research 56:3  pp. 309 ff. Crossref logo
Chae, Hee-Rahk
2020. Constraints on the Perfective [V-ko (iss-)] in Korean:With Reference to a Present State Reading. Lanaguage Research 56:3  pp. 309 ff. Crossref logo
Ogihara, Toshiyuki & Eun-Hae Park
2019. Aspect shift without coercion: continuous causative verbs in Japanese and Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 28:2  pp. 107 ff. Crossref logo
서성기
2016. Resultative Readings in -ko issta Construction. Studies in Generative Grammar 26:4  pp. 453 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.