Article published in:
Honorific language and linguistic politeness in Korean
Edited by John Whitman and Lucien Brown
[Korean Linguistics 17:2] 2015
► pp. 127–131

Honorifics and politeness in Korean

| University of Oregon
| Cornell University
Published online: 03 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.17.2.001int
References
Choe, Hyun-Sook
1988 Restructuring Parameters and Complex Predicates. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-bok & Peter Sells
2007 “Korean Honorification: A Kind of Expressive Meaning.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16:4.303–336.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Y.K
1990 On Panmal in Korean. Proceedings of the International Conference on Korean Linguistics 71.232–255.
2001 Change in Korean Honorifics Reflecting Social Change. Language Change in East Asia ed by McAuley Thomas, 27–46. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
King, Ross
1994 History of Reported Speech in Korean. Korean Linguistics 81.1–38.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2005 The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter & Jong-Bok Kim
2006 “Honorification in Korean as Expressive Meaning.” Korean Linguistics 131.167–195.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1996 Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life. Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium about Language and Soceity-Austin [SALSA] ed. by Rebecca Parker et al., 266–295. Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010 (Inter)Subjectivity and (Inter)Subjectification: A Reassessment. Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization ed by Kristin Davidse, et al., 29–71.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristinnn, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens
eds. 2010 Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar