Cover not available
Article published In:
Honorific language and linguistic politeness in Korean
Edited by John Whitman and Lucien Brown
[Korean Linguistics 17:2] 2015
► pp. 132–166

Towards understanding the syntactic representation of honorifics in Korean

| The George Washington University
One of the salient features of the Korean language is honorifics. Two kinds of honorifics have been discussed in the literature, subject honorific and addressee honorific. The subject honorific is characterized by honorific markers on the subject and predicate. The addressee honorific is usually marked by formal and/or polite speech style particles at the end of a sentence. The subject honorific is characterized by its optionality which has raised many questions about its nature, whether it is a type of formal feature agreement or not. The addressee honorific, however, has not received much attention from a theoretical perspective in the literature though much descriptive work is available. In this paper, we attempt to discuss the optionality of subject honorific in the context of the nature of honorifics in general, including the addressee honorific. More specifically, we examine how honorific is encoded in the grammar by focusing on embedding of honorifics. Some empirical data show that embedding of honorifics (or politeness) is restricted in certain constructions. Based on examining these constructions, we claim that there is a generalization that prohibits the occurrence of honorific/politeness marker in the embedded CP domain. We further claim that this restriction interacts with subject honorific in such a way that it forces the agreement of honorific to take place obligatorily in certain constructions, thereby making the optionality of the subject honorific to hold only conditionally and circumstantially.
Keywords: imperatives, speech style particles, Jussive Phrase, agreement, optionality of subject honorific, Addresse honorific, embedding, CP domain, politeness, subject honorifics
Published online: 3 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.17.2.01pak
References (63)
Ahn, Sung-Ho. 1994. A Note on Agreement. Explorations in Generative Grammar: A Festschrift for Dong-Whee Yang ed. by Young-Sun Kim et al. Seoul: Hankwuk Publishing Company.Google Scholar
. 2002. Honorification and AgrP. A Talk Delivered at 2002 Winter Conference of Linguistic of Society of Korean , Seoul National University. February 6, 2002.
Ahn, Hee-Don & Hang-Jin Yoon. 1989. Functional Categories in Korean. Harvard International Studies on Korean Linguistics III ed. by S. Kuno, et al. 79–88. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 2008. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics). Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric & Fumikazu Niinuma. 2004. Conditions on Agreement in Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22:3.453–480.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandner, Ellen. 2004. Head-movement in Minimalism, and V2 as Force-marking. Interface Explorations 9: Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery ed. by Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler, 97–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1960. The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. Style in Language ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 253–276. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L. S. 1991. On the Typology of WH-questions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Choe, Hyun-Sook. 1988. Restructuring Parameters and Complex Predicates. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
Choe, Jae-Woong. 2004. Obligatory Honorification and the Honorific Feature. Studies in Generative Grammar 14:4.545–559.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by Phase. Ken Hale: A Life in Language ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1977. Filters and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 111.425–504.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco & Iulia Zegrean. 2010. Splitting up Force, Evidence from Discourse Particles. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 201 ed. by Brugè Laura, 7–34.Google Scholar
Cormack, Annabel & Neil Smith. 1996. Checking Theory: Features, Functional Heads and Checking Parameters. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 81.1–40.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2010. Eccentric Agreement in Italo-Romance. A Closer Look into Feature- bundles. Syntax Lab Cambridge University.Google Scholar
. 2011. Eccentric Agreement in Italo-Romance and Parameterized v. Invited Lecture at UQAM , Montreal. May 2011.
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Martina Wiltschko. 2012. Heterogeneity of Reflexives. University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra. 2010. About the Speaker (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 2000. Locality and Extended Projection. Lexical Specification and Insertion 1971 ed. by Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert, & Jane Grimshaw, 115–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill. 2013. The Syntacticization of Discourse. Syntax and its Limits ed. by Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali, & Robert Truswell, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Chung-Hye. 1998. The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Han, Hak-Sung. 1993. Hankwukeui AgrP-wa NegP (AgrP and NegP in Korean). Ene ( Language ) 18:2.437–461. Seoul.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harada, Shin-Ichi. 1976. Honorifics. Syntax and Semantics 5: Japanese Generative Grammar ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani, 499–561. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Nobuko. 2005. Honorifics. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax 21 ed. by Martin Everaert & Henk Van Riemsdijk, 493–543. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Google Scholar
Kang, Myung-Yoon. 1988. Topics in Korean Syntax: Phrase Structure, Variable Binding and Movement. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
Keine, Stefan. 2012. Case Splits and the Order of Elementary Operations. Proceedings of ConSOLE XVII1, 163–188. Universiteit Leiden.
Kim, Yong-Ha. 2012. Noun Classes and Subject Honorification in Korean. Linguistic Research 29:3.563–578.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. 1990. On Panmal in Korean. Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Korean Linguistics ed. by Eung-Jin Baek, International Circle of Korean Linguistics & Osaka University of Economics and Law, 232–255. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
. 1999. Pragmatic Embedding for Honorification and Politeness. Harvard International Studies on Korean Linguistics VIII1.419–435. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Young-Key & Miok Pak. 2006. Agreement in Korean Syntax: A Case of Sentence Final Particles. Harvard International Symposium on Korean Linguistics XI1.548–561. Seoul, Hanshin.
Koopman, Hilda. 2005. Korean (and Japanese) Morphology from a Syntactic Perspective. Linguistic Inquiry 361.601–633.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. Making a Pronoun: Fake Indexicals as Windows into the Properties of Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40:2.187–237.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Ilsop & S. Robert Ramsey. 2000. The Korean Language. Albany: University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1992. A Reference Grammar of Korean: A Complete Guide to the Grammar and History of the Korean Language. Rutland, Vermont, & Tokyo, Japan: Charles E. Tuttle Company.Google Scholar
Mauck, Simon, Miok Pak, Paul Portner & Raffaella Zanuttini. 2005. Clause Typing in Imperatives: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics ed. by C. Brandstetter & D. Rus, 135–152.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2012. Agreements that Occur Mainly in the Main Clause. Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons ed. by Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman, & Rachel Nye, 70–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oyharçabal, Beñat. 1993. Verb Agreement with non Arguments: On Allocutive Agreement. Generative Studies in Basque Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 105] ed. by José Ignacio Hualde & Jon Ortiz de Urbina, 89–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pak, Miok. 2006. Jussive Clauses and Agreement of Sentence Final Particles in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 141 ed. by Timothy Vance & Kimberly Jones, 295–306. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
. 2008. Types of Clauses and Sentence End Particles in Korean. Korean Linguistics 141 ed. by Young-Key Kim-Renaud et al., 113–155. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pak, Miok, Paul Portner, & Raffaella Zanuttini. 2008. Agreement in Promissive, Imperative, and Exhortative Clauses. Korean Linguistics ed. by 141 Young-Key Kim-Renaud et al., 157–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Speech Style in Root and Embedded Imperatives. Paper presented at Workshop on ‘Imperatives, Embeddability, and Politeness’ . October 17, 2013. Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Park, Byung-Soo. 1992. The Semantic and Pragmatic Nature of Honorific Agreement in Korean: An Information Based Approach. Unpublished ms., Kyung-Hee University and Stanford University.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2007. The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features. Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation ed. by Simin Karimi, Vida Samilan, & Wendy Wilkins, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Ivan Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and Stanford, CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20:3.365–424.Google Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa & Arhonto Terzi. 1995. Imperatives, V-movement and Logical Mood. Journal of Linguistics 311.301–332.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–339. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryu, Dong-Seok. 1993. Kwueui maykaypyenin mwunpep (Korean parametric grammar). Ph. D. Dissertation, Seoul National University.
Sells, Peter & Jong-Bok Kim. 2007. Korean Honorification: A Kind of Expressive Meaning. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 161.303–336.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2009. Language Quarks. Iberia 1:1.169–183.Google Scholar
. 2010. On EPP Effects. Studia Linguistica 64:2.159–189.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 2006. Economy, Agreement and the Representation of Null Arguments. Argument and Agreement ed. by Peter Ackema, Patrick Brandt, Maaike Schoorlemmer, & Fred Weerman, 35–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret & Carol T. Tenny. 2004. The Interaction of Clausal Syntax, Discourse Roles, and Information Structure Questions. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Questions (16th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information; ESSLLI 16), Nancy, France.
Sohn, Ho-Min. 1999. The Korean Language. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tenny, Carol. 2000. Core Events and Adverbial Modification. Events as Grammatical Objects ed. by Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky, 285–334. Chicago: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline. 1990. Specifier-head Agreement in Japanese. Proceedings of WCCFL 91.535–548.
Ura, Hiroyuki. 1993. L-relatedness and Parametric Variation. Papers on Case and Agreement. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 181 ed. by Colin Phillips, .377–399. MIT press.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple Spell-Out. Working Minimalism ed. by Samuel D. Epstein & Norbert Hornstein, 251–282. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yoon, James Hye-Suk. 2005. Non-morphological Determination of Nominal Affix Ordering in Korean. Clitic and Affix Combinations: Theoretical Perspectives ed. by Lorie Heggie & Francisco Ordóñez, 239–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella, Miok Pak, & Paul Portner. 2012. A Syntactic Analysis of Interpretive Restrictions on Imperative, Promissive, and Exhortative Subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 301.1231–1274.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Batchelder-Schwab, Andre
2023. Truncation, affection, and pain in Southern Bantu. Linguistique et langues africaines :9(1) DOI logo
Kumari, Preeti
2023. Comparing Honorificity Agreement in Maithili and Bangla. In Variation in South Asian Languages, ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Alok, Deepak & Bill Haddican
2022. The formal heterogeneity of allocutivity. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1 DOI logo
Haddican, Bill & Urtzi Etxeberria
2022. Embedded allocutivity in Basque. Syntax 25:4 ► pp. 545 ff. DOI logo
Alok, Deepak
2021. The Morphosyntax of Magahi Addressee Agreement. Syntax 24:3 ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Kaur, Gurmeet
2020. On the syntax of addressee in imperatives: insights from allocutivity. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
Haddican, Bill
2018. The syntax of Basque allocutive clitics. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.