Article published In:
Honorific language and linguistic politeness in Korean
Edited by John Whitman and Lucien Brown
[Korean Linguistics 17:2] 2015
► pp. 167206
References (47)
An, Pyong-hi
1961Cwuchey kyem.yang-pep uy cepmisa ‘-sôp’ ey tayha.ye (On the humilitative suffix –sŏp). Cintan Hakpo (Seoul) 221.103–166.Google Scholar
1968Cwungsey kwuke sokkyek emi ‘-s’ ey tayha.ye (On the Middle Korean genitive ending ‘-s’). Festschrift for Dr. Sungnyong Lee. Seoul: Ulyu.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2006Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Lucien
2015Honorifics and Politeness. The Handbook of Korean Linguistics ed. by Lucien Brown & Jaehoon Yeon, 303–319. West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, & William Pagliuca
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Choy, Yunkap
1987Cwungsey cosene mwunpep (A Middle Korean grammar). Yanci, China: Yenpyen University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1990Typology and Universals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givόn, Talmy
1985Iconicity, Isomorphism, and Nonarbitrary Coding in Syntax. Iconicity in Syntax ed. by John Haiman, 187–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990Syntax. 2nd vol1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
1983Iconic and Eonomic Motivation. Language 59:4.781–819.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999Why is Grammaticalization Irreversible? Linguistics 37:6.1043–1068.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, Yunpyo
1994Kuntay kwuke yenkwu I (A study on Pre-modern Korean I). Seoul: Thayhaksa.Google Scholar
199617 seyki kwuke sacen (A dictionary of the 17th century Korean). Seoul: Thayhaksa.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J
1991On Some Principles of Grammaticalization. Approaches to grammaticalization I ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huh, Woong
1954Contaypep-sa (A history of honorifics). Sengkyun Hakpo 11.Google Scholar
1972Cwungsey kwuke yenkwu (A study of Middle Korean). Seoul: Cengum-sa.Google Scholar
1975Wuli yeys malpon (A grammar of Early Korean). Seoul: Kwahak-sa.Google Scholar
1976Yeys malpon. Seoul: Saym Mwunhwa-sa.Google Scholar
Ju, Kyongmi
1990Kuntay-kwuke senemal emi ey tayhan yenkwu (A Study of pre-final endings in Pre-Modern Korean). MA thesis. Seoul: Dankuk University.Google Scholar
Kang, Kyuseon & Kyeongsu Hwang
2003Cwungsey kwuke mwunpep-lon (A Middle Korean grammar). Seoul: Chengwun.Google Scholar
Kim, Cheongsu
198317 seyki hankwukmal uy nophim-pep kwa ku 15 seyki lopwuthe-uy pyenchen (Honorifics of the 17th century and their changes from the 15th century). Seoul: Cengumsa.Google Scholar
Kim, Dongso
2007Hankwuke uy yeksa (A history of Korean). Daegu: Jeonglimsa.Google Scholar
Kim, Il-Keun
1988Enkan uy yenkwu (A study of vernacular letters). Seoul: Konguk University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Jongmyong
198519 seyki kwuke uy kyek yenkwu (A study of 19th century case). MA thesis. Seoul: Dankwuk University.Google Scholar
Kim, Mi-hyeong
1990Kwuke taymyengsa uy paltal kwa cheykyey ey kwanhan yenkwu (A study on the development and system of Korean pronouns). PhD dissertation. Seoul: Hanyang University.
Kim, Minju
2011Grammaticalization in Korean: The Evolution of the Existential Verb. Korean Linguistics Series 5. London: Saffron Books.Google Scholar
Kim, Ui-Su
1998Kuntay kwuke uy taywupep (Honorifics in Pre-Modern Korean). Kuntay kwuke mwunpep uy ihay (Understanding of Pre-Modern Korean grammar) ed. by Jong-Seon Hong, 329–364. Seoul: Pakiceng.Google Scholar
Ko, Yong-Kun
2007Phyocwun cwungsey kwuke mwunpep-lon, Kaycengphan (Standard Middle Korean grammar–revised edition). Seoul: Cipmwuntang.Google Scholar
Koh, Kyoungtae
1998Kuntay kwuke uy emal emi (Word-final endings in Pre-Modern Korean). Kuntay kwuke mwunpep uy ihay (Understanding of Pre-Modern Korean grammar) ed. by Jong-Seon Hong, 177–213. Seoul: Pakiceng.Google Scholar
Lee, Hidu
2000Kwuke conching hyengthay uy pyenhwa kwaceng yenkwu (A study on the processes of Korean honorific forms). Seoul: Pokosa.Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-Moon & S. Robert Ramsey
2011A History of the Korean Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Tae Yeong
1991Kuntay kwuke {-skuysye}, {-kyese} uy pyenchen kwaceng caylon (A revisit to the developmental processes of Pre-Modern –skusye and –kyesye ). Cwusikyeng Hakpo 81.Google Scholar
Lee, Taeyong
1997Yekcwu chephaysine (Annotated Japanese primer). Seoul: Thayhaksa.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change. Lingua e Stile 20:3.303–318.Google Scholar
Nam, Pung-Hyun
2009Kotay hankwuke yenkwu (A study of Old Korean). Seoul: Sikan uy Mulley.Google Scholar
2012Old Korean. The Languages of Japan and Korea ed. by Nicolas Tranter, 41–72. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pak, Lyangkyu
1991Kwuke kyengepep uy pyenchen (Changes in Korean honorifics). In Say Kwuke Saynghwal 1:3.23–39.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min
1978Contractions as a Mechanism of Polysemic Breeding: A Device for Speaker Involvement in Korean. Papers in Korean Linguistics ed. by Chin-W. Kim, 197–205. Columbia: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
1986Intercultural Communication in Cognitive Values: Americans and Koreans. Linguistic Expeditions ed. by Ho-min Sohn, 438–471. Seoul: Hansin.Google Scholar
1998Evolution of Addressee Honorifics in Korean. Perspectives on Korea ed. by Sang Oak Lee & Duk-Soo Park, 480–490. Sydney: Wild Peony.Google Scholar
1999The Korean Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock
2002The Grammaticalization of Honorific Particles in Korean. New Reflection on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 309–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010(Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: A Reassessment. In K. Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens, eds., 29–71.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristinnn, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens
eds. 2010Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Hahn Sok, Hee-Sook Kim, Jeong-woon Park, Seong-Cheol Kim, So-young Chay, Hyesook Kim & Jeongbok Lee
2005Hankwuk sahoy wa hochinge (Korean society and address terms). Seoul: Yeklak.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by 7 other publications

Joo, Soo Hyoung, Yuna Seong, Joowon Suh, Ji-Young Jung & James E. Purpura
2023. Assessing Korean writing ability through a scenario-based assessment approach. Assessing Writing 58  pp. 100766 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Minju
2023. Between honorifics and non-honorifics: A study of the Korean semi-honorific style and a comparison with Japanese. Discourse Studies 25:5  pp. 664 ff. DOI logo
Yamada, Akitaka
2023. Honorificity. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Lucien
2022. Politeness as normative, evaluative and discriminatory: the case of verbal hygiene discourses on correct honorifics use in South Korea. Journal of Politeness Research 18:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Hyunji, Bodo Winter & Lucien Brown
2021. Beyond politeness markers: Multiple morphological and lexical differences index deferential meanings in Korean. Journal of Pragmatics 182  pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, DOI logo
Song, Sanghoun, Jae-Woong Choe & Eunjeong Oh
2019. An empirical study of honorific mismatches in Korean. Language Sciences 75  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.