Article published In:
Honorific language and linguistic politeness in Korean
Edited by John Whitman and Lucien Brown
[Korean Linguistics 17:2] 2015
► pp. 167206
References
An, Pyong-hi
1961Cwuchey kyem.yang-pep uy cepmisa ‘-sôp’ ey tayha.ye (On the humilitative suffix –sŏp). Cintan Hakpo (Seoul) 221.103–166.Google Scholar
1968Cwungsey kwuke sokkyek emi ‘-s’ ey tayha.ye (On the Middle Korean genitive ending ‘-s’). Festschrift for Dr. Sungnyong Lee. Seoul: Ulyu.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2006Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Lucien
2015Honorifics and Politeness. The Handbook of Korean Linguistics ed. by Lucien Brown & Jaehoon Yeon, 303–319. West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, & William Pagliuca
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Choy, Yunkap
1987Cwungsey cosene mwunpep (A Middle Korean grammar). Yanci, China: Yenpyen University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1990Typology and Universals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givόn, Talmy
1985Iconicity, Isomorphism, and Nonarbitrary Coding in Syntax. Iconicity in Syntax ed. by John Haiman, 187–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990Syntax. 2nd vol1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
1983Iconic and Eonomic Motivation. Language 59:4.781–819.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999Why is Grammaticalization Irreversible? Linguistics 37:6.1043–1068.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, Yunpyo
1994Kuntay kwuke yenkwu I (A study on Pre-modern Korean I). Seoul: Thayhaksa.Google Scholar
199617 seyki kwuke sacen (A dictionary of the 17th century Korean). Seoul: Thayhaksa.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J
1991On Some Principles of Grammaticalization. Approaches to grammaticalization I ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huh, Woong
1954Contaypep-sa (A history of honorifics). Sengkyun Hakpo 11.Google Scholar
1972Cwungsey kwuke yenkwu (A study of Middle Korean). Seoul: Cengum-sa.Google Scholar
1975Wuli yeys malpon (A grammar of Early Korean). Seoul: Kwahak-sa.Google Scholar
1976Yeys malpon. Seoul: Saym Mwunhwa-sa.Google Scholar
Ju, Kyongmi
1990Kuntay-kwuke senemal emi ey tayhan yenkwu (A Study of pre-final endings in Pre-Modern Korean). MA thesis. Seoul: Dankuk University.Google Scholar
Kang, Kyuseon & Kyeongsu Hwang
2003Cwungsey kwuke mwunpep-lon (A Middle Korean grammar). Seoul: Chengwun.Google Scholar
Kim, Cheongsu
198317 seyki hankwukmal uy nophim-pep kwa ku 15 seyki lopwuthe-uy pyenchen (Honorifics of the 17th century and their changes from the 15th century). Seoul: Cengumsa.Google Scholar
Kim, Dongso
2007Hankwuke uy yeksa (A history of Korean). Daegu: Jeonglimsa.Google Scholar
Kim, Il-Keun
1988Enkan uy yenkwu (A study of vernacular letters). Seoul: Konguk University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Jongmyong
198519 seyki kwuke uy kyek yenkwu (A study of 19th century case). MA thesis. Seoul: Dankwuk University.Google Scholar
Kim, Mi-hyeong
1990Kwuke taymyengsa uy paltal kwa cheykyey ey kwanhan yenkwu (A study on the development and system of Korean pronouns). PhD dissertation. Seoul: Hanyang University.
Kim, Minju
2011Grammaticalization in Korean: The Evolution of the Existential Verb. Korean Linguistics Series 5. London: Saffron Books.Google Scholar
Kim, Ui-Su
1998Kuntay kwuke uy taywupep (Honorifics in Pre-Modern Korean). Kuntay kwuke mwunpep uy ihay (Understanding of Pre-Modern Korean grammar) ed. by Jong-Seon Hong, 329–364. Seoul: Pakiceng.Google Scholar
Ko, Yong-Kun
2007Phyocwun cwungsey kwuke mwunpep-lon, Kaycengphan (Standard Middle Korean grammar–revised edition). Seoul: Cipmwuntang.Google Scholar
Koh, Kyoungtae
1998Kuntay kwuke uy emal emi (Word-final endings in Pre-Modern Korean). Kuntay kwuke mwunpep uy ihay (Understanding of Pre-Modern Korean grammar) ed. by Jong-Seon Hong, 177–213. Seoul: Pakiceng.Google Scholar
Lee, Hidu
2000Kwuke conching hyengthay uy pyenhwa kwaceng yenkwu (A study on the processes of Korean honorific forms). Seoul: Pokosa.Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-Moon & S. Robert Ramsey
2011A History of the Korean Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Tae Yeong
1991Kuntay kwuke {-skuysye}, {-kyese} uy pyenchen kwaceng caylon (A revisit to the developmental processes of Pre-Modern –skusye and –kyesye ). Cwusikyeng Hakpo 81.Google Scholar
Lee, Taeyong
1997Yekcwu chephaysine (Annotated Japanese primer). Seoul: Thayhaksa.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change. Lingua e Stile 20:3.303–318.Google Scholar
Nam, Pung-Hyun
2009Kotay hankwuke yenkwu (A study of Old Korean). Seoul: Sikan uy Mulley.Google Scholar
2012Old Korean. The Languages of Japan and Korea ed. by Nicolas Tranter, 41–72. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pak, Lyangkyu
1991Kwuke kyengepep uy pyenchen (Changes in Korean honorifics). In Say Kwuke Saynghwal 1:3.23–39.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min
1978Contractions as a Mechanism of Polysemic Breeding: A Device for Speaker Involvement in Korean. Papers in Korean Linguistics ed. by Chin-W. Kim, 197–205. Columbia: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
1986Intercultural Communication in Cognitive Values: Americans and Koreans. Linguistic Expeditions ed. by Ho-min Sohn, 438–471. Seoul: Hansin.Google Scholar
1998Evolution of Addressee Honorifics in Korean. Perspectives on Korea ed. by Sang Oak Lee & Duk-Soo Park, 480–490. Sydney: Wild Peony.Google Scholar
1999The Korean Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock
2002The Grammaticalization of Honorific Particles in Korean. New Reflection on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 309–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010(Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: A Reassessment. In K. Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens, eds., 29–71.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristinnn, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens
eds. 2010Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Hahn Sok, Hee-Sook Kim, Jeong-woon Park, Seong-Cheol Kim, So-young Chay, Hyesook Kim & Jeongbok Lee
2005Hankwuk sahoy wa hochinge (Korean society and address terms). Seoul: Yeklak.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Brown, Lucien
2022. Politeness as normative, evaluative and discriminatory: the case of verbal hygiene discourses on correct honorifics use in South Korea. Journal of Politeness Research 18:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Joo, Soo Hyoung, Yuna Seong, Joowon Suh, Ji-Young Jung & James E. Purpura
2023. Assessing Korean writing ability through a scenario-based assessment approach. Assessing Writing 58  pp. 100766 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Hyunji, Bodo Winter & Lucien Brown
2021. Beyond politeness markers: Multiple morphological and lexical differences index deferential meanings in Korean. Journal of Pragmatics 182  pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Minju
2023. Between honorifics and non-honorifics: A study of the Korean semi-honorific style and a comparison with Japanese. Discourse Studies 25:5  pp. 664 ff. DOI logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, DOI logo
Song, Sanghoun, Jae-Woong Choe & Eunjeong Oh
2019. An empirical study of honorific mismatches in Korean. Language Sciences 75  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Yamada, Akitaka
2023. Honorificity. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.