Article published in:
Honorific language and linguistic politeness in Korean
Edited by John Whitman and Lucien Brown
[Korean Linguistics 17:2] 2015
► pp. 242–266

Expressive, social and gendered meanings of Korean honorifics

| University of Oregon
Traditional research on Korean honorifics has tended to assume that these forms have fixed meanings such as deference and respect. In this paper, I argue that such meanings only represent the most prototypical and normative expressive meanings of honorific forms. By surveying recent pragmatics and sociolinguistic research, I show how honorifics can communicate a variety of context-specific affective meanings. Some of these meanings, such as sarcasm and factuality, are very distant from the presumption that honorifics are markers of deference. In addition to affective meanings, I also argue that honorifics have social meanings. In other words, when speakers use honorifics, these forms communicate something about the speaker’s own identity. Someone who uses honorifics well may be perceived as educated, well-bred and even as a “good” Korean. Finally, I discuss how honorifics are tied up with gendered meanings in Korean speech and how phonetics may be playing a role.
Keywords: expressive meaning, honorifics, indexicality, gender, social meaning
Published online: 03 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.17.2.04bro
References

References

Abe, Hideko
2004 Lesbian Bar Talk in Shinjuku, Tokyo. In Shigeko Okamoto & Janet Shibamoto Smith, eds., Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology, 205–221.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif
2007 Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
An, Yunmi
2010 Kulustoyn nophimmal nampali pwulun sillyey [The rudeness of the incorrect overuse of honorifics]. Chosun Ilbo. March 9th 2010.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko
1990 Language and Affect. Annual Review of Anthropology 19.419–451.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bezooijen, Renee van
1995 Sociocultural Aspects of Pitch Differences between Japanese and Dutch Women. Language and Speech, 38:3.253–265.Google Scholar
Block, David
2007 Second Language Identities. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Brown, Lucien
2007 Alternation between “Polite” and “Deferential” Speech Styles in Korean Public Discourse. Paper presented at International Pragmatics Conference , Göteborg, Sweden, July 8–13.
2010 Observations on Korean and Japanese Speech Style Shifting. Journal of Korean Culture 14.65–102.Google Scholar
2011a Honorifics and Politeness in Second Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b Korean Honorifics and “Revealed”, “Ignored” and “Suppressed” Aspects of Korean Culture and Politeness.” Politeness across Cultures ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini & Daniel Kádár, 106–127. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a Identity and Honorifics Use in Korean Study Abroad. Social and Cultural Aspects of Language Learning in Study Abroad ed. by Celeste Kinginger, 269–298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b “Mind Your Own Esteemed Business”: Sarcastic Honorifics Use and Impoliteness in Korean TV Dramas. Journal of Politeness Research 9:2.159–186.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015a Honorifics and Politeness. In Lucien Brown & Jaehoon Yeon, edsThe Handbook of Korean Linguistics, .  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015b Revisiting “polite” -yo and “deferential” -supnita Speech Style Shifting in Korean from the Viewpoint of Indexicality. Journal of Pragmatics 79. 43–59.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
, Noriko Iwasaki & Keunyoung Lee 2016 Implementing Multiliteracies in the Korean Classroom through Visual Media. Multiliteracies in World Languages Education ed. by Yuri Kumagai, Ana Lopez-Sanchez, & Sujane Wu. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Lucien, Bodo Winter, Kaori Idemaru & Sven Grawunder
2014 Phonetics and Politeness: Perceiving Korean Honorific and Non-Honorific Speech through Phonetic Cues. Journal of Pragmatics 66.45–60.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lucien & Jaehoon Yeon
eds. 2015 The Handbook of Korean Linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
① ②
Byon, Andrew
2007 Teaching the Polite and the Deferential Speech Levels, Using Media Materials: Advanced KFL Classroom Settings. Selected Papers from Pragmatics in the CJK Classroom: The State of the Art ed. by Dina Yoshimi & Haidan Wang, 21–64. http://​nflrc​.hawaii​.edu​/CJKProceedings. Accessed December 24, 2013.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-A.
2006 Gender Differences in Korean Speech. Korean Language in Culture and Society ed. by Ho-min Sohn, 189–198. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko Minegishi
2011 Are Honorifics Polite? Uses of Referent Honorifics in a Japanese Committee Meeting. Journal of Pragmatics 43.3655–3672.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dredge, C. Paul
1983 What is Politeness in Korean Speech? Korean Linguistics 3.21–32.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Cynthia Dickel
2013 Speaking Politely, Kindly, and Beautifully. Multilingua 32:2.225–245.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Sally McConnell-Ginet
2003 Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eun, Jong-oh & Susan Strauss
2004 The Primacy of Information Status in the Alternation between Deferential and Polite Forms in Korean Public Discourse. Language Sciences 26.251–272.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1956 The Nature of Deference and Demeanor. American Anthropologist 58:3.473–502.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harkness, Nicholas
2015 Linguistic Emblems of South Korean Society. In Lucien Brown & Jaehoon Yeon, eds.The Handbook of Korean Linguistics, Google Scholar
Hatfield, Hunter & Jee-Won Hahn
2011 What Korean Apologies Require of Politeness Theory. Journal of Pragmatics 43:5.1303–1317.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Juck-ryoon
1975 Role of Sociolinguistics in Foreign Language Education with Reference to Korean and English Terms of Address and Levels of Deference. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
1990 “Deference” Versus “politeness” in Korean Speech. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 82.41–55.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko & Megumi Yoshida
1999 Sociolinguistics: Honorifics and Gender Differences. The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics ed. by Natsuko Tsujimura, 444–480. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jones, Kimberly & Tsuyoshi Ono
eds. 2008 Style Shifting in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel & Sara Mills
2011 Politeness in East Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
① ②
Kádár, Daniel & Yuling Pan
2011 Politeness in China. In Daniel Kádár & Sara Mills, eds., Politeness in East Asia, 125–146.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jong-bok & Peter Sells
2007 Korean Honorification: A Kind of Expressive Meaning. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16:4.303–336.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Young-Key
2001 Change in Korean Honorifics Reflecting Social Change. Language Change in East Asia ed. by Thomas McAuley, 27–46. London: Curzon.Google Scholar
King, Ross & Jaehoon Yeon
2009 Elementary Korean. 2nd ed. Boston, Mass: Tuttle.Google Scholar
Koo, Ja-sook
1995 Politeness Theory: Universality and Specificity. PhD diss., Harvard University.Google Scholar
Lee, Chang-soo
1996 Variation in the Use of Korean Honorific Verbal Endings: An Interactional Sociolinguistic Study. PhD dissertation, Boston University.
Lee, Jung-bok
1999 Kwukekyengepep-uy cenlyakcek yongpep-ey tayhaye [On the Strategic Usage of Korean Honorifics]. Ehakyenkwu [Language Research] 35:1.91–122.Google Scholar
Lee, Won-kyu
1991 Honorifics and Politeness in Korean. PhD diss., The University of Wisconsin at Madison.Google Scholar
Leung, Constant, Roxy Harris & Ben Rampton
1997 The Idealized Native Speaker, Reified Ethics and Classroom Realities. TESOL Quarterly 31:3.543–560.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Dong-hoon
2000 Hankwuke emi ‘–si–’ uy mwunpep [The grammar of the Korean verb ending ‘–si–’]. Seoul: Kwukehakhoy.Google Scholar
Lo, Adrienne & Jenna Kim
2011 Manufacturing Citizenship: Metapragmatic Framings of Language Competencies in Media Images of Mixed Race Men in South Korea. Discourse & Society 22:4.440–457.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lukoff, Fred
1982 An Introductory Course in Korean. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel
1992 A Reference Grammar of Korean. Rutland: Tuttle.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
1990 Indexicality and Socialization. Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development ed. by James Stigler, Richard Shweder, & Gilbert Herdt, 287-308. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
National Institute for The Korean Language
2012 Phyocwun ene yeycel [Standard linguistic etiquette]. Seoul: National Institute for The Korean Language.Google Scholar
Ofuka, Etsuko, J. Denis McKeown, Mitch Waterman & Peter Roach
2000 Prosodic Cues for Rated Politeness in Japanese Speech. Speech Communication 32:199–217.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John
1984 An Ethological Perspective on Common Cross-language Utilization of F0 of Voice. Phonetica 41.1–16.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohara, Yumiko
1993 Koe no takasa kara ukeru inshoo nit suite [Images of voice pitch]. Kotoba [Words] 14.14–19.Google Scholar
1997 Shakaigengogaku no kanten kara mita nihonjin no koe no takasa [Japanese pitch from a sociophonetic perspective]. Joseigo no sekai [World of Women’s Language] ed. by Sachiko Ide, 42–58. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
2001 Finding One’s Voice in Japanese: A Study of the Pitch Levels of L2 Users. Multilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Gender ed. by Aneta Pavlenko, Adrian Brackledge, Ingrid Piller & Marya Teutsch-Dwyer, 231–254. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko
2004 Ideology in Linguistic Practice and Analysis: Gender and Politeness in Japanese Revisited. In Shigeko Okamoto & Janet Shibamoto Smith, eds., Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology, 38–56.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko & Janet Shibamoto Smith
2004 Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
① ②
Pizziconi, Barbara
2011 Japanese Honorifics: The cultural Specificity of a Universal Mechanism. In Daniel Kádár & Sara Mills, eds., Politeness in East Asia, 45–70.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2005 The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter & Jong-Bok Kim
2006 Honorification in Korean as Expressive Meaning. Korean Linguistics 13.167–195.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 Shifters, Linguistic Categories and Cultural Description. Meaning in Anthropology ed. by Keith Basso & Henry Selby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
2003 Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Social Life. Language and Communication 23.193–229.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “Cultural” Concepts and the Language-Culture Nexus. Current Anthropology 45:5.621–52.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Milton
1984 Man’s Glassy Essence: Explorations in Semiotic Anthropology. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min
1986 Linguistic Expeditions. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Strauss, Susan
2005 Cognitive Realization Markers: A Discourse-pragmatic Study of the Sentence Ending Particles -kwun, -ney, and -tela . Language Sciences 27.437–480.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Susan & Eun Jong-oh
2005 Indexicality and Honorific Speech Level Choice in Korean. Linguistics 43:3.611–651.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suh, Cheong-soo
1984 Contaypep yenkwu [Honorifics Research]. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Sunaoshi, Yukako
2004 Farm Women’s Professional Discourse in Ibaraki. In Shigeko Okamoto & Janet Shibamoto Smith, eds., 187–204.Google Scholar
Sung, Ky-chull
1985 Hyentay taywupep yenkwu [Research on Contemporary Honorifics]. Seoul: Kaymunsa.Google Scholar
Wang, Hahn-sok
1984 Honorific Use in a Rural Korean Village: Structure and Use. PhD diss., University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard
2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Bodo & Sven Grawunder
2011 The Polite Voice in Korean: Searching for Acoustic Correlates of contaymal and panmal . Japanese/Korean Linguistics 19 ed. by Homin Sohn, Haruko Cook, William O’Grady, Leon Angelo Serafim & Sang Yee Cheon, 419–431. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2012 The Phonetic Profile of Korean Formal and Informal Speech Registers. Journal of Phonetics 40.808–815.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolk, Lesley, Nassima Abdelli-Beruh & Dianne Slavin
2011 Habitual Use of Vocal Fry in Young Adult Female Speakers. Journal of Voice 26:3.111–116.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamazawa, Hideko & Harry Hollien
1992 Speaking Fundamental Frequency of Japanese Women. Phonetica 49.128–140.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Kyung-joo
2004 Not Just Words: Korean Social Modes and the Use of Honorifics. Intercultural Pragmatics 1:2.189–210.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yun, Sung-kyu
1993 Honorific Agreement. PhD dissertation, University of Hawaii.
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Idemaru, Kaori, Bodo Winter & Lucien Brown
2019. Cross-cultural multimodal politeness: The phonetics of Japanese deferential speech in comparison to Korean . Intercultural Pragmatics 16:5 ► pp. 517 ff. Crossref logo
Song, Sanghoun, Jae-Woong Choe & Eunjeong Oh
2019. An empirical study of honorific mismatches in Korean. Language Sciences 75 ► pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.