Passive and Middle Constructions in Korean
In this paper, I have shown evidence that the potential Korean middle construction (K2) is a passive, adducing five pieces of evidence: (1) spontaneity, (2) the existence of an agent, (3) non-stative, (4) non-generic, and (5) no requirement of adverb modification. It will also be classified under a morphological passive, since it carries the same morpheme as the suffixal passive and has properties of the canonical passive.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Boutault, Joasha
2020.
Vers une définition des constructions « tough » en anglais : les adjectifs et leur complément infinitif.
Anglophonia :30
Yap, Foong Ha & Mikyung Ahn
2019.
Development of grammatical voice marking in Korean: On the causative, middle and passive uses of suffix -i.
Lingua 219
► pp. 1 ff.
Eun-Ji Lee
2014.
Ergativity in Korean.
Korean Journal of Linguistics 39:4
► pp. 945 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.