This paper focuses on the so-called discourse pro-drop languages,i.e., those permitting radical pro-drop, which affects not just subjects,but other pronominal arguments too. Whereas previous attempts tounderstand the properties of these languages have focused on verbalagreement, the proposal here is that it is in fact the properties of thepronominal paradigm that determine the availability or otherwise ofradical pro-drop. In particular, we propose that radical pro-drop willonly be possible in languages with “transparent” (i.e., non-fusional)pronominal paradigms, since pro-drop falls out as the consequenceof the zero spell-out of regular pronouns. On the empirical front, weshow that investigation of a wide range of languages would seem toconfirm our prediction.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.