Part of
The Limits of Syntactic VariationEdited by Theresa Biberauer
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132] 2008
► pp. 331–348
Edited by Theresa Biberauer
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132] 2008
► pp. 331–348
Case morphology and radical pro-drop
This paper focuses on the so-called discourse pro-drop languages,
i.e., those permitting radical pro-drop, which affects not just subjects,
but other pronominal arguments too. Whereas previous attempts to
understand the properties of these languages have focused on verbal
agreement, the proposal here is that it is in fact the properties of the
pronominal paradigm that determine the availability or otherwise of
radical pro-drop. In particular, we propose that radical pro-drop will
only be possible in languages with “transparent” (i.e., non-fusional)
pronominal paradigms, since pro-drop falls out as the consequence
of the zero spell-out of regular pronouns. On the empirical front, we
show that investigation of a wide range of languages would seem to
confirm our prediction.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Sheehan, Michelle
2021. Parameters and Linguistic Variation. In A Companion to Chomsky, ► pp. 172 ff. 
Frascarelli, Mara & Marco Casentini
2019. The Interpretation of Null Subjects in a Radical Pro-drop Language: Topic Chains and Discourse-semantic Requirements in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 40:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Rusten, Kristian A.
2019. Referential Null Subjects in Early English,
Walkden, George
2013. Null subjects in Old English. Language Variation and Change 25:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.