Part of
Cross-linguistic Semantics of Tense, Aspect, and ModalityEdited by Lotte Hogeweg, Helen de Hoop and Andrej L. Malchukov
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 148] 2009
► pp. 365–402
Edited by Lotte Hogeweg, Helen de Hoop and Andrej L. Malchukov
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 148] 2009
► pp. 365–402
The Estonian partitive evidential
Some notes on the semantic parallels between aspect and evidential categories
Anne Tamm | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, University of Florence
This article shows that the Estonian partitive evidential marks predicates in sentences that express incomplete evidence. Partitive occurs in the categories of aspect, epistemic modality, and evidentiality, marking objects and present participles. Despite the difference in syntax, the semantics of these categories is based on parallel relationships. More specifically, the aspectual partitive marks objects in sentences describing incomplete events, and the partitive evidential appears in sentences that encode incomplete evidence compared to the expectation of complete evidence.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Tamm, Anne, Reili Argus & Kadri Suurmäe
2018. Chapter 6. Uralic perspectives on experimental evidence for evidentials. In Evidence for Evidentiality [Human Cognitive Processing, 61], ► pp. 145 ff. 
Tamm, Anne
2015. Negation in Estonian. In Negation in Uralic Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 108], ► pp. 399 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.