The syntactic differences between long and short forms of Russian adjectives
The present paper analyses the syntax of long- and short-form adjectives in Russian. I argue that the two morphological forms correspond to two syntactic structures. Long-form Russian adjectives appear as secondary predicates: they have an unbound theta-role that needs to be bound by a c-commanding DP. The phrasal projection of short-form adjectives, on the other hand, is a small clause with a nominative subject that bears the stem’s external theta role; the subject raises to the spec-position of the copula projection with which the short-form small clause obligatorily merges. The main analytical challenge is posed by examples with a copula, where both LF- and SF-adjectives can appear. I give detailed empirical evidence from agreement, constituency and other constructions that in combination with a copula long-form and short-form adjectives enter into different syntactic configurations.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Paykin, Katia & Marleen Van Peteghem
2020.
Des adjectifs tough dans des langues sans construction Tough ? Le cas du russe.
Langages N° 218:2
► pp. 75 ff.
Nagano, Akiko
2018.
A conversion analysis of so-called coercion from relational to qualitative adjectives in English.
Word Structure 11:2
► pp. 185 ff.
Talić, Aida
2015.
Adverb extraction, specificity, and structural parallelism.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 60:3
► pp. 417 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.