Article published in:
Continuity and Change in GrammarEdited by Anne Breitbarth, Christopher Lucas, Sheila Watts and David Willis
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 159] 2010
► pp. 61–76
Continuity is change
The long tail of Jespersen’s cycle in Flemish
Anne Breitbarth | Ghent University
Liliane Haegeman | Ghent University
All West Germanic languages have completed Jespersen’s Cycle, replacing a preverbal negation marker (stage I) with a post-verbal one (stage III) after a period of transition during which the two could co-occur (stage II). Only the Flemish dialects have maintained the old preverbal marker to some extent. The present chapter addresses this apparent historical continuity, establishing that Flemish en was in fact saved from the fate of its West Germanic cognates by a morphosyntactic change. Based on an analysis of the contexts in which preverbal en is found in present-day Flemish dialects, it is argued that en has evolved into a marker of emphasis of polarity, and that contrary to appearances, the Flemish dialects have in fact reached stage III.
Published online: 29 July 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.159.03bre
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.159.03bre
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Haegeman, Liliane & Ciro Greco
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.