Extraction Asymmetries
Experimental evidence from German
This monograph addresses divergent views in the linguistic literature on whether German displays the that-trace effect and other subject/object asymmetries commonly found for long extractions in English and other languages. Using newly developed rating methodologies, the author exposes consistent and robust subject/object asymmetries in German – a surprisingly unequivocal result given that the existence of these effects is controversial. This finding raises important questions: how can one account for the discrepancy between the clear experimental evidence on the one hand, and the lack of consensus in the linguistic literature on the other? And secondly, it raises again the old question of why subject extractions are dispreferred. This work also provides intriguing new insights into the long-standing question on how to analyse German constructions such as Wer glaubst du hat recht? – the ‘parenthesis versus extraction debate'. In this work decisive evidence points in favour of the parenthetical analysis.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 163] 2010. xvi, 273 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 2 August 2010
Published online on 2 August 2010
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
List of figures | pp. xiii–xiv
-
Preface and acknowledgements | pp. xv–xvi
-
Chapter 1. An introduction to long extraction | pp. 1–25
-
Chapter 2. Judgement studies: Methodology and evaluation | pp. 27–39
-
Chapter 3. Subject/object asymmetries in German: Establishing the basic data pattern | pp. 41–80
-
Chapter 4. A controversial case: Extraction from V2-clause or parenthetical construction? | pp. 81–122
-
Chapter 5. Locating the explanation for the subject/object asymmetry in the matrix clause | pp. 123–169
-
Chapter 6. Locating the explanation for the subject/object asymmetry in the embedded clause | pp. 171–227
-
Chapter 7. Conclusions | pp. 229–244
-
-
Appendix A: Experimental materials | pp. 255–269
-
Index | pp. 271–273
“This volume is the first in-depth empirical study of long extraction in German, using experimental rating studies. The results invite the linguist to take a fresh look at the nature of universal grammar and the issue of parameter setting, suggesting that parameters are set by threshold levels in an underlying system of continuous deviations from universal principles.”
Wolfgang Sternefeld, University of Tübingen
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Blümel, Andreas
Toquero-Pérez, Luis Miguel
2022. Revisiting extraction and subextraction patterns from arguments. Linguistic Variation 22:1 ► pp. 123 ff.
Bader, Markus
Cowart, Wayne & Dana McDaniel
Hoot, Bradley & Shane Ebert
Salzmann, Martin
McDaniel, Dana
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFK: Grammar, syntax
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General