The present paper focuses on labile verbs – lexemes which can behave transitively or intransitively without a formal change. Haspelmath (1993a) and Comrie (2006) claim that the semantic spontaneity is the crucial factor for the distribution of inchoative/causative oppositions, based on data of the causative and the anticausative formal type. In contrast, my analysis of labile verbs across languages shows that for lability, another factor is crucial, namely, the semantic classification of verbs. In particular, the groups as motion verbs, destruction verbs, and phasal verbs tend to be labile across languages.
2022. Bribri media tantum verbs and the rise of labile syntax. Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 617 ff.
Vivanco, Margot
2021. Scalar Constraints on Anticausative SE: The Aspectual Hypothesis Revisited. In Unraveling the complexity of SE [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 99], ► pp. 291 ff.
Bermejo, Víctor Lara
2019. Lability in Western Peninsular Spanish. Studia Linguistica 73:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Lara, Victor
2017. Patrones de ergatividad en el español peninsular. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 25:1 ► pp. 93 ff.
2014. Coding causal–noncausal verb alternations: A form–frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50:3 ► pp. 587 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.