This paper summarizes an existing bidirectional six-level model of phonology and phonetics (and a bit of morphology). Bidirectionality in this case refers to the modelling of both the speaking process (production) and the listening process (comprehension). The elements of the grammar (the constraints) are bidirectional in the sense that the speaker and listener use the same sets of constraints, with the same rankings. In contrast with Blutner’s and Mattasusch’s bidirectional OT models, the evaluation is the simplest possible, i.e. it is performed unidirectionally in both directions of processing; still, listener-oriented effects tend to emerge from having learning algorithms for the comprehension direction alone. This paper describes a great number of learning algorithms in both directions of processing, and their typical results across one or multiple generations.
2024. Formalising phonological perception: The role of voicing assimilation in consonant cluster perception in Emilian dialects. Journal of Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 253 ff.
Zhang, Sijia & Anne-Michelle Tessier
2024. Modeling the consequences of an L1 grammar for L2 production: simulations, variation, and predictions. Frontiers in Language Sciences 3
Horslund, Camilla Søballe, Rasmus Puggaard-Rode & Henrik Jørgensen
2022. A phonetically-based phoneme analysis of the Danish consonant system. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 54:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Kapatsinski, Vsevolod
2022. Morphology in a Parallel, Distributed, Interactive Architecture of Language Production. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 5
Zhou, Chao
2022. L2 speech learning of European Portuguese /l/ and /ɾ/ by L1-Mandarin learners: Experimental evidence and theoretical modelling. Language Acquisition 29:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Yazawa, Kakeru, James Whang, Mariko Kondo & Paola Escudero
2020. Language-dependent cue weighting: An investigation of perception modes in L2 learning. Second Language Research 36:4 ► pp. 557 ff.
Yazawa, Kakeru, James Whang, Mariko Kondo & Paola Escudero
2023. Feature-driven new sound category formation: computational implementation with the L2LP model and beyond. Frontiers in Language Sciences 2
Hoekstra, Eric & Arjen P. Versloot
2019. Factors promoting the retention of irregularity. Morphology 29:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Jarosz, Gaja
2019. Computational Modeling of Phonological Learning. Annual Review of Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Zuraw, Kie, Kathleen Chase O'Flynn & Kaeli Ward
2019. Non-native contrasts in Tongan loans. Phonology 36:1 ► pp. 127 ff.
Hall, Kathleen Currie, Elizabeth Hume, T. Florian Jaeger & Andrew Wedel
2018. The role of predictability in shaping phonological patterns. Linguistics Vanguard 4:s2
Hamann, Silke & Ilaria E. Colombo
2017. A formal account of the interaction of orthography and perception. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35:3 ► pp. 683 ff.
Turton, Danielle
2017. Categorical or gradient? An ultrasound investigation of /l/-darkening and vocalization in varieties of English. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 8:1
Hoekstra, Eric & Arjen Versloot
2016. Three-Verb Clusters in Interference Frisian: A Stochastic Model over Sequential Syntactic Input. Language and Speech 59:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Richtsmeier, Peter
2016. Phonological and Semantic Cues to Learning from Word-Types. Laboratory Phonology 7:1
van Leussen, Jan-Willem & Paola Escudero
2015. Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: the L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Baroni, Antonio
2013. Eye dialect and casual speech spelling: Orthographic variation in OT. Writing Systems Research 5:1 ► pp. 24 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.