Number agreement in Basque
Counting vs. Measuring
This paper argues that Basque non-agreeing quantifiers are conceptually measures and that measures head their own functional projection in the expanded structure of the Noun Phrase. This functional projection is placed in-between the Classifier Phrase (where division occurs) and the Number Phrase (where counting occurs), following Borer (2005). The distinction we make between the measuring field (in Measure Phrase position) and the counting field (in NumP position) affects referentiality; in fact, agreement and reference only become relevant upon reaching NumP – not before that position, i.e. not in Measure Phrase position. We also show that non-agreeing quantifiers are sensitive to the nature of the predicates they associate with.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Rezac, Milan, Pablo Albizu & Ricardo Etxepare
2014.
The structural ergative of Basque and the theory of Case.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32:4
► pp. 1273 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.