The present book is a typological study in crucial portions of the grammars of French/Romance and German/Germanic. It starts by asking: What do adverbs, pronouns and full noun phrases have in common? This question is tackled, on the one hand, from an empirical perspective by the description of relevant linguistic facts leading to significant and unexpected generalizations, and, on the other hand, from a theoretical perspective by the formalization of (i) a novel model of the Xbar-schema containing at most two Specifiers (double Spec model) and (ii) a well-defined model of Checking Theory, distinguishing A-feature checking from Abar-feature checking (Criterion).
The first part of the book deals with the typology and placement of adverbs, while the second part of the book presents the application of Checking Theory, in interaction with the double Spec model of Xbar-theory, to pronouns in Romance and Germanic. The final part of the book contains a treatment of scrambling in Germanic and shows that word order variations among arguments and adverbs within the German(ic) Mittelfeld can be adequately explained in the light of the version of Checking Theory and Phrase Structure Theory developed so far for adverbs and pronouns. We are led to the conclusion that the well-known issue of word order variations can find promising solutions with the Principles & Parameters framework, on the basis of a well-defined formalization of (i) Xbar-theory, (ii) Checking Theory, (iii) clause structure composition, and (iv) locality constraints on syntactic operations and relations.
2024. Complexity of Linguistic Structures, Simplicity of Language Mechanisms. In Complexity of Linguistic Structures, Simplicity of Language Mechanisms,
Frascarelli, Mara & Ángel L. Jiménez‐Fernández
2021. How Much Room for Discourse in Imperative? The Lens of Interface on English, Italian and Spanish*. Studia Linguistica 75:3 ► pp. 375 ff.
Barbosa, Pilar & Cecile De Cat
2019. Intervention effects in wh-chains: the combined effect of syntax and processing. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1
BERG, THOMAS
2019. Adjective phrases with doubly modified heads: how lexical information influences word order and constituent structure. English Language and Linguistics 23:2 ► pp. 341 ff.
Laenzlinger, Christopher & Gabriela Soare
2017. A Feature-Based Account of Weak Islands. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, ► pp. 11 ff.
Pollock, Jean‐Yves & Cecilia Poletto
2017. Subject Clitics and (Complex) Inversion. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff.
Wehrli, Eric
2017. Parsing Language-Specific Constructions: The Case of French Pronominal Clitics. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, ► pp. 465 ff.
Dimković-Telebaković, Gordana
2016. Phrase Structure Patterning and Licensing for English and Serbian Speaker-Oriented Adverb Subclasses. Romanian Journal of English Studies 13:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Hermas, Abdelkader
2014. L2 and L3 ultimate attainment: an investigation of two parameters. International Journal of Multilingualism 11:2 ► pp. 202 ff.
Arnaut-Karović, Kamiah
2013. SOME CONSTRAINTS ON PASSIVE ATTRIBUTES AND PROBLEMS OF CATEGORIZATION. Zbornik radova Islamskog pedagoškog fakulteta u Zenici (Online)► pp. 245 ff.
Li, Yafei, Rebecca Shields & Vivian Lin
2012. Adverb classes and the nature of minimality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30:1 ► pp. 217 ff.
Ordóñez, Francisco
2012. Clitics in Spanish. In The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics, ► pp. 423 ff.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2010. ComplexWh‐phrases Don't Move: On the Interaction between the Split CP Hypothesis and the Syntax ofWh‐movement. In The Complementizer Phase, ► pp. 236 ff.
Gallego, Ángel J.
2010. Subextraction from Phase Edges. In The Complementizer Phase, ► pp. 51 ff.
Kotzoglou, George
2010. (Non-)Extraction from Subjects as an Edge Phenomenon. In The Complementizer Phase, ► pp. 33 ff.
Manzini, M. Rita
2010. The Structure and Interpretation of (Romance) Complementizers. In The Complementizer Phase, ► pp. 167 ff.
Martins, Ana Maria & Jairo Nunes
2010. Apparent Hyper‐raising in Brazilian Portuguese: Agreement with Topics across a Finite CP. In The Complementizer Phase, ► pp. 143 ff.
Mayr, Clemens
2010. On the Necessity of Phi‐features: The Case of Bavarian Subject Extraction. In The Complementizer Phase, ► pp. 117 ff.
E. Phoevos Panagiotidis
2010. Introduction: Complementizers and Their Phase. In The Complementizer Phase, ► pp. 1 ff.
E. Phoevos Panagiotidis
2010. The Complementizer Phase,
Preminger, Omer
2010. Nested Interrogatives and the Locus ofWh. In The Complementizer Phase, ► pp. 200 ff.
Rizzi, Luigi
2010. On Some Properties of Criterial Freezing. In The Complementizer Phase, ► pp. 17 ff.
Rizzi, Luigi
2018. Intervention effects in grammar and language acquisition. Probus 30:2 ► pp. 339 ff.
Rizzi, Luigi
2021. Complexité des structures linguistiques, simplicité des mécanismes du langage. In Complexité des structures linguistiques, simplicité des mécanismes du langage,
Roussou, Anna
2010. Subjects on the Edge. In The Complementizer Phase, ► pp. 76 ff.
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur
2007. Verb‐third in embedded clauses in Icelandic*. Studia Linguistica 61:3 ► pp. 237 ff.
Nevins, Andrew
2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25:2 ► pp. 273 ff.
Cat, Cécile De
2005. French subject clitics are not agreement markers. Lingua 115:9 ► pp. 1195 ff.
Laenzlinger, Christopher
2005. French adjective ordering: perspectives on DP-internal movement types. Lingua 115:5 ► pp. 645 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.