Article published in:
The Lexicon–Syntax Interface: Perspectives from South Asian languages
Edited by Pritha Chandra and Richa Srishti
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 209] 2014
► pp. 245270
References

References

Aissen, Judith
1999Markedness and subject choice in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 673–711. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. Economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rakesh
1999. Verb Movement and the Syntax of Kashmiri . Kluwer: Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred
1967Syntactic features in morphology: General problems of so-called pronominal inflection in German. In To Honor Roman Jakobson (ed.), vol. 1, 239–270, The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea
2008On the shyness of the first person: Investigations on markedeness and under specification in morphology. MUMSA Conference , Harvard University, March 1–3, 2008.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph
1966 Language Universals . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken
1972A new perspective on American Indian linguistics. In: New Perspectives on the Pueblos , Alfonso Ortiz (ed.), 87–103. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger , Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994Some key features of distributed morphology. In Papers on Phonology and Morphology , Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Tony Bures (eds), Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. 21, 275–288.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris
1997Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Papers at the Interface , Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang & Martha McGinnis (eds), Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: 425–449.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter Edwin & Koul, Omkar N.
1984Pronominal suffixes and split ergativity in Kashmiri. In Aspects of Kashmiri Linguistics , Omkar N. Koul & Peter Edwin Hook (eds), 123–135. Delhi: Bahri.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter
1987Poguli syntax in the light of Kashmiri: A preliminary report. In Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 17(1): 63–71.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1936Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6: 240–288, reprinted 1966 In Readings in Linguistics II, Eric Hamp, Fred Householder & Robert Austerlitz (eds), 51–89, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Keine, Stefan
2007Reanalysing Hindi split ergativity as a morphological phenomenon. In 1 2 Many , Jochen Trommer & Andreas Opitz (eds), Universität Leipzig, Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 85, 1–2.Google Scholar
Keine, Stefan & Müller, Gereon
2008Differential argument encoding by impoverishment. In Scales , M. Richards & A. Malchukov (eds), 83–136. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne
2008Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 55–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manetta, Emily
2006Peripheries in Kashmiri and Hindi-Urdu. PhD dissertation. University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
2011Peripheries in Hindi-Urdu and Kashmiri. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devyani
2001Kashmiri case clitics and person hierarchy effects. In Formal and Empirical Issues in Optimal Theoretic Syntax , Peter Sells (ed.), 225–256. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In: Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages , R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Subbarao, Kārumūri V.
2001Agreement in south Asian languages and minimalist inquiries: The framework. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages , P. Bhaskararao & K. V. Subbarao (eds), 457–492. London/New Delhi: Sage Publications/Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Wali, Kashi & Koul, Ashok
1994Kashmiri clitics: The role of case and CASE. Linguistics 32: 969–994. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wali, Kashi & Koul, Omkar N.
1997 Kashmiri . New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen
2001Case Patterns. In Optimality-Theoretic Syntax . Eds. Geraldine Legendre, Jane Grimshaw, and Sten Vikner. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 509–543.Google Scholar