Cover not available
Part of
Cross-linguistic Investigations of Nominalization Patterns
Edited by Ileana Paul
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 210] 2014
► pp. 3–24

Nominalizations in Ojibwe

| University of Ottawa
The aim of this paper is to account for nominalization processes in Ojibwe including agent and non-agent nominalizations. I make two main claims: (1) in Ojibwe (even) simple nouns (result nominals, cf. Grimshaw 1990) have internal (verbal) structure; (2) agent nominals in Ojibwe are not exactly nominalizations: they are more like full clauses (with no nominal projection on top of the CP). Theoretically, I address for Ojibwe the puzzle mentioned by Harley (2009) for English nominalizations: meaning shifts from event to result readings do not affect the internal morphological structure of the nominalization. In Ojibwe, it will be argued that, although many nominalizations have transitive morphology, the transitive verb that is imported into the nominalization process is devoid of an internal and of an external argument, creating result nominalization rather than event nominalization.
Published online: 18 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.210.01mat
References (35)
References
Abney, Stephen. 1987. The English Noun Phrase and its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalizations and Ergativity [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. On the role of syntactic locality in morphological processes: The case of (Greek) deverbal nominals. In Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization, Anastasia Giannakidou & Monica Rathert (eds), 253-280. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Gianina, Iordachioaia & Soare, Elena. 2010. Syntactic realization of plural in Romance and Germanic nominalizations. In Romance Linguistics 2008: Interactions in Romance [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 313], Karlos Arregi, Zsuzsanna Fagyal, Silvina A. Montrul and Annie Tremblay (eds), 107-124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barrie, Michael & Mathieu, Eric. 2011. Head movement and noun incorporation. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 133-142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basic, Monika. 2010. On the morphological make-up of nominalizations in Serbian. In The Syntax of Nominalizations Across Languages and Frameworks, Artemis Alexiadou & Monica Rathert (eds), 39-66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blain, Eleanor Marie. 1997. Wh-Constructions in Nêhiyawêwin (Plains Cree). PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1957. Eastern Ojibwa: Grammatical Sketch, Texts and Word List. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2003. Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations. In The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory, John Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds), 31-67. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2005. The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borsley, Robert & Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2000. Mixed extended projections. In The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories, Robert Borsley (ed.), 101-132. San Diego CA: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brittain, Julie. 2003. A Distributed Morphology account of the syntax of the Algonquian verb. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association , [URL] (18 June 2013).
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick Jacobs & Peter Rosenbaum (eds), 184-221. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
. 1977. On wh movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akajian (eds), 71-132. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Fredin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133-166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairbanks, Brendan. 2009. Ojibwe Discourse Markers. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane B. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel J. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger [Current Studies in Linguistics], Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 53-109. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2009. The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalizations, Anastasia Giannakidou & Monica Rathert (eds), 321-343. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hirose, Tomio. 2002. Origins of Predicates: Evidence from Plains Cree. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
. 2003. Origins of Predicates: Evidence from Plains Cree. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johns, Alana. 2008. Some issues concerning Algonquian WH questions. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 29.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109-137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lees, Robert. 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lochbihler, Bethany & Mathieu, Eric. 2008/2009. Wh-agreement in Ojibwe: Consequences for feature inheritance and the categorical status of tense. In University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics, Proceedings of WSCLA 13 & 14, Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas , Heather Bliss & Raphael Girard (eds), 14-31. Vancouver BC: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
. To appear. Héritage des traits morphologiques ϕ et δ en ojibwe. Papers of the 40th Algonquian Conference .
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 201-225.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Eric. 2008. The syntax of abstract and concrete finals in Ojibwe. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 37) , Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow (eds), 101-114. Charleston SC: BookSurge Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2013. Denominal verbs in Ojibwe. International Journal of American Linguistics 79: 97-132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-Based and Discourse-Configurational Languages. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, John D. 1980. Ojibwe Morphology. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Richards, Marc. 2007. On feature inheritance: An argument from the phase impenetrability condition. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 231-246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberge, Yves. 2002. Transitivity requirement effects and the EPP. Paper presented at WECOL 2002 , Vancouver BC.
Valentine, J. Randolph. 2001. Nishnaabemwin Reference Grammar. Toronto ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Spyropoulos, Vassilios, Anthi Revithiadou & Phoevos Panagiotidis
2015. Verbalizers leave marks: evidence from Greek. Morphology 25:3 ► pp. 299 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.