Cover not available
Part of
Cross-linguistic Investigations of Nominalization Patterns
Edited by Ileana Paul
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 210] 2014
► pp. 169–188

Derivation by gender in Lithuanian

| University of Ottawa
For a long time, grammatical gender has been viewed solely as a feature inherent to nouns and necessary to track agreement between noun and other elements within an utterance (Aikhenvald 2003; Hockett 1958; Corbett 1991). However, since the seminal article of Ritter (1991), other uses and characteristics of gender as an abstract feature have been brought to light. For example, gender has been argued to play a role in numeral classification (Mathieu 2012), or serve as an expression of speaker perspective (Armoskaite & Wiltschko 2012; Gerdts 2011). This study focuses on the role of gender in the derivation of nouns. Based on Lithuanian (Baltic), the paper argues that gender may derive nouns from nouns, adjectives and verbs.
Published online: 18 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.210.07arm
References (34)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2003. Classifiers. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Adger, David & Svenonius, Peter. 2011. Features in minimalist syntax. In Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed.), 27-52. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas (ed.) 1997. Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Ambrazas, Saulius. 2000. Daiktavardžių darybos raida. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas.Google Scholar
Armoskaite, Solveiga. In prep. Featuring conversion.
. 2011. The Destiny of Roots in Blackfoot and Lithuanian. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Armoskaite, Solveiga & Wiltschko, Martina. 2012. There are many ways to be gendered. In The Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Canadian Linguistics Association . [URL]
Balteiro, Isabel. 2007. A Contribution to the Study of Conversion in English. Münster: Waxman.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conzett, Phillip. 2010. The role of grammatical gender in noun formation. A diachronic perspective from Norwegian. In Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation, Alexander Onysko & Sascha Michel (eds), 147-195. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diercks, Michael. 2010. Agreement with Subjects in Lubukusu. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Gerdts, Donna. 2011. The Purview effect: Feminine gender on inanimates in Halkomelem Salish. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society . Berkeley CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Hegarty, Michael. 2005. A Feature Based Syntax of Functional Categories. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakaitienė, Evalda, Laigonaitė, Adele & Paulauskienė, Aldona. Lietuvių kalbos morpfologija. Vilnius: Mokslas.
Kramer, Ruth. 2009. Definite Markers, Phi-features, and Agreement: A Morphosyntactic Investigation of the Amharic DP. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
. 2011. The Morphosyntax of Gender: Evidence from Amharic. Handout from a colloquium given at the Yale Linguistics Department.
Kayne, Richard. 1995. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keinys, Saulius. 1999. Bendrinės lietuvių kalbos žodžių daryba. Šiauliai: Šiaulių universiteto leidykla.Google Scholar
Kibort, Anna & Corbett, Greville. 2010. Features. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laigonaitė, Adele. 1961. Daiktavardžių giminės ir skaičiaus kategorija. In Dabartinė lietuvių kalba, Jonas Kazlauskas, Adele Laigonaitė, Vincas Urbutis (eds), 122-47. Vilnius: Valstybinė politinės ir mokslinės literatūros leidykla.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 2008. On n, nP and √. In The Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedus, Henk van Riemsdjik, 105-140. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alex. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium [University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. 4(2)], Alexis Dimitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek-Clark & Alexander Williams (eds), 201-225. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Eric. 2012a. Flavors of division. Linguistic Inquiry 43(4): 650-679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. On the mass/count distinction in Ojibwe. In Count and Mass across Languages, Diane Massam (ed.), 172-198. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike & Spriggs, Ruth. To appear. The grammar of Teop.
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2002. The Noun Phrase. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Elisabeth & Wiltschko, Martina. 2009. Varieties of INFL: TENSE, LOCATION, and PERSON. In Alternatives to Cartography, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), 153-203. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Elisabeth. 1991. Where is Gender? Linguistic Inquiry 24(4): 795-803. Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-334. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Blackwell: Oxford.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steriopolo, Olga & Wiltschko, Martina. 2010. Distributed GENDER hypothesis. In Formal Studies in Slavic Linguistics, Gerhild Zybatow, Philip Dudchuk, Serge Minor & Ekaterina Pshehotskaya (eds), 155-172. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 2011. Regimes of Derivation in Syntax and Morphology. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Unterbeck, Barbara, Rissanen, Matti, Nevalainen, Terttu & Saari, Mirja (eds), 2000. Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Berlin: Mounton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fuchs, Zuzanna & Jenneke van der Wal
2022. The locus of parametric variation in Bantu gender and nominal derivation. Linguistic Variation 22:2 ► pp. 268 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.