Part of
Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, Variationist and Comparative Perspectives
Edited by Andreas Dufter and Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 214] 2014
► pp. 7798
References (28)
References
Bosque, Ignacio & Demonte, Violeta (eds). 1999. Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española , 3 Vols. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Campos, Héctor. 1999. Transitividad e intransitividad. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 1519–1574.
Cano Aguilar, Rafael. 1987. Estructuras sintácticas transitivas en el español actual . Madrid: Gredos.
Company Company, Concepción. 2006. El objeto indirecto . In Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal , Vol. 1, Concepción Company Company (ed.), 477–572. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México y Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Dufter, Andreas & Stark, Elisabeth. 2008. Double indirect object marking in Spanish and Italian. In Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 77], Elena Seoane & María José López-Couso (eds), 111–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Elvira, Javier. 1993. La función cohesiva de la posición inicial de frase en la prosa alfonsí. Cahiers de linguistique hispanique médiévale 18–19: 243–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. La catáfora paratáctica: ¿residuos de oralidad en la lengua antigua? Pandora . Revue d’Études Hispaniques 2: 67–78.Google Scholar
. 2011b. Aproximación al concepto de productividad. In Sintaxis y análisis del discurso hablado en español . Homenaje a Antonio Narbona Jiménez, José Jesús de Bustos Tovar, Rafael Cano Aguilar, Elena Méndez García de Paredes & Araceli López Serena (eds), Vol. 2, 747–761. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.
Enrique-Arias, Andrés. 2003. From clitics to inflections: Diachronic and typological evidence for affixal object agreement marking in Spanish. In Les unités morphologiques. Forum de morphologie (3e rencontres) , Bernard Fradin et al.. (eds), 67–75. Lille: Université de Lille.
Fernández-Soriano, Olga. 1999. Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish: Locative and dative subjects. Syntax 2(2): 101–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francesconi, Armando. 2005. La dislocación en la sintaxis italiana y española. Aspectos textuales traductivos. In L’insula del ‘Don Chisciotte’. Linguistica contrastiva tra italiano e lingue iberiche. Atti del XXIII Congresso Aispi, 6–8 ottobre 2005 , Maria Caterina Ruta & Laura Silvestri (eds), 202–222. Palermo: Flaccovio.
García-Miguel, José María. 1991. La duplicación de complemento directo e indirecto como concordancia. Verba 18: 375–410.Google Scholar
Gili Gaya, Samuel. 1973. Curso superior de sintaxis española . Barcelona: Vox.
Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Subject and Topic , Charles Li (ed.), 149–188. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador. 1999. Los dativos. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 1855–1928.
Heger, Klaus. 1967. La conjugación objetiva en castellano y francés. Thesaurus. Boletín del Instituto Caro y Cuervo 22(2): 163–175.Google Scholar
Hidalgo Downing, Raquel. 2001. La dislocación a la izquierda en español. Estudio de corpus. PhD dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Llorente, Maldonado & Mondéjar, José. 1972. La conjugación objetiva en español. Revista Española de Lingüística 4: 1–60.Google Scholar
Riiho, Timo. 1988. La redundancia pronominal en el iberorromance medieval . Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rini, Joel. 1991. The redundant indirect object construction in Spanish. A new perspective. Romance Philology 45(2): 269–286.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1999. From anaphoric pronoun to grammatical marker: Why objects don’t make it. Folia Linguistica 33(2): 225–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Person . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vázquez Rozas, Victoria & García Salido, Marcos. 2012. A discourse-based analysis of object clitic doubling in Spanish. In Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 271–298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, Elisabeth. 2008. (Non-)canonical marking of experiencer objects: A typological comparison of Chinese, Korean, Turkish, and Modern Greek. Language Typology and Universals 61(1): 81–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009a. Experiencer objects and object clitics in Modern Greek: Evidence from a corpus study. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, University of Ioannina, Aug 30th – Sept 2nd 2007 , Mary Baltazani, George K. Giannakis, Tasos Tsagalidis & George I. Xydopoulos (eds), 574–588. Ioannina: University of Ioannina.
. 2009b. Grammaticalization in constructions: Clitic doubling with experiencers in Modern Greek. In Studies on Grammaticalization , Elisabeth Verhoeven, Stavros Skopeteas, Young-Min Shin, Yoko Nishina & Johannes Helmbrecht (eds), 251–281. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2010. Agentivity and stativity in experiencer verbs: Implications for a typology of verb classes. Linguistic Typology 14(2–3): 213–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (18)

Cited by 18 other publications

Sanromán Vilas, Begoña
2021. La discordancia de número en el doblado de objeto indirecto: nuevos datos del español de Galicia. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 137:2  pp. 477 ff. DOI logo
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A. & Karen De Clercq
2019. From negative cleft to external negator. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
Batllori, Montserrat, Elisabeth Gibert-Sotelo & Isabel Pujol
2019. Changes in the argument and event structure of psych verbs in the history of Spanish. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Bernstein, Judy, Francisco Ordóñez & Francesc Roca
2019. On the emergence of personal articles in the history of Catalan. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Blümel, Andreas & Marco Coniglio
2019. What kind of constructions yield what kind of constructions?. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Miriam Bouzouita, Anne Breitbarth, Lieven Danckaert & Elisabeth Witzenhausen
2019. Cycles in Language Change, DOI logo
Breitbarth, Anne, Lieven Danckaert, Elisabeth Witzenhausen & Miriam Bouzouita
2019. Cycling through diachrony. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
De Clercq, Karen
2019. French negation, the Superset Principle, and Feature Conservation. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Fischer, Susann, Mario Navarro & Jorge Vega Vilanova
2019. The clitic doubling parameter. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Fuß, Eric
2019. When morphological and syntactic change are not in sync. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Garzonio, Jacopo & Silvia Rossi
2019. Weak elements in cycles. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Kinn, Kari
2019. Bare singular nouns in Middle Norwegian. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Moreno, Mitrović
2019. Quantificational cycles and shifts. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Poletto, Cecilia & Emanuela Sanfelici
2019. On the relative cycle. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
van Gelderen, Elly
2019. Cyclical change and problems of projection. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Copyright Page. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Series preface. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. List of abbreviations. In Cycles in Language Change,  pp. ix ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.