The traditional approach to clitic doubling in Spanish has usually attempted an explanation for the absence or presence of redundant pronouns that is based on mechanisms related to discourse or the organization of information (topicalization, focus, contrast, etc.). These very same principles raise some problems when trying to explain clitic doubling in biargumental stative constructions whose person argument is expressed by a dative (a mi padre le gusta el cine ‘my father likes cinema’). This paper proposes a contrastive approach to specific cases of dative clitic doubling in stative constructions, which compares them with redundant uses of the dative pronoun in transitive constructions. This distinction leads to a better understanding of clitic doubling as agreement. The research is based on both synchronic and diachronic data.
(eds) 1999Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 3 Vols. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Campos, Héctor
1999 Transitividad e intransitividad. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 1519–1574.
Cano Aguilar, Rafael
1987Estructuras sintácticas transitivas en el español actual. Madrid: Gredos.
Company Company, Concepción
2006El objeto indirecto. In
Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal
, Vol. 1, Concepción Company Company (ed.), 477–572. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México y Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Dufter, Andreas & Stark, Elisabeth
2008Double indirect object marking in Spanish and Italian. In Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 77], Elena Seoane & María José López-Couso (eds), 111–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Elvira, Javier
1993La función cohesiva de la posición inicial de frase en la prosa alfonsí. Cahiers de linguistique hispanique médiévale 18–19: 243–278.
Elvira, Javier
2002La catáfora paratáctica: ¿residuos de oralidad en la lengua antigua? Pandora. Revue d’Études Hispaniques 2: 67–78.
2011bAproximación al concepto de productividad. In Sintaxis y análisis del discurso hablado en español. Homenaje a Antonio Narbona Jiménez, José Jesús de Bustos Tovar, Rafael Cano Aguilar, Elena Méndez García de Paredes & Araceli López Serena (eds), Vol. 2, 747–761. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.
Enrique-Arias, Andrés
2003From clitics to inflections: Diachronic and typological evidence for affixal object agreement marking in Spanish. In Les unités morphologiques. Forum de morphologie (3e rencontres), Bernard Fradinet al.. (eds), 67–75. Lille: Université de Lille.
Fernández-Soriano, Olga
1999Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish: Locative and dative subjects. Syntax 2(2): 101–140.
Francesconi, Armando
2005La dislocación en la sintaxis italiana y española. Aspectos textuales traductivos. In L’insula del ‘Don Chisciotte’. Linguistica contrastiva tra italiano e lingue iberiche. Atti del XXIII Congresso Aispi, 6–8 ottobre 2005, Maria Caterina Ruta & Laura Silvestri (eds), 202–222. Palermo: Flaccovio.
García-Miguel, José María
1991La duplicación de complemento directo e indirecto como concordancia. Verba 18: 375–410.
Gili Gaya, Samuel
1973Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Vox.
Givón, Talmy
1976Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 149–188. New York NY: Academic Press.
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador
1999Los dativos. In Bosque & Demonte (eds), 1855–1928.
Heger, Klaus
1967La conjugación objetiva en castellano y francés. Thesaurus. Boletín del Instituto Caro y Cuervo 22(2): 163–175.
Hidalgo Downing, Raquel
2001La dislocación a la izquierda en español. Estudio de corpus. PhD dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Llorente, Maldonado & Mondéjar, José
1972La conjugación objetiva en español. Revista Española de Lingüística 4: 1–60.
Riiho, Timo
1988La redundancia pronominal en el iberorromance medieval. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Rini, Joel
1991The redundant indirect object construction in Spanish. A new perspective. Romance Philology 45(2): 269–286.
Siewierska, Anna
1999From anaphoric pronoun to grammatical marker: Why objects don’t make it. Folia Linguistica 33(2): 225–251.
Siewierska, Anna
2004Person. Cambridge: CUP.
Vázquez Rozas, Victoria & García Salido, Marcos
2012A discourse-based analysis of object clitic doubling in Spanish. In Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 271–298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Verhoeven, Elisabeth
2008 (Non-)canonical marking of experiencer objects: A typological comparison of Chinese, Korean, Turkish, and Modern Greek. Language Typology and Universals 61(1): 81–92.
Verhoeven, Elisabeth
2009aExperiencer objects and object clitics in Modern Greek: Evidence from a corpus study. In
Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, University of Ioannina, Aug 30th – Sept 2nd 2007
, Mary Baltazani, George K. Giannakis, Tasos Tsagalidis & George I. Xydopoulos (eds), 574–588. Ioannina: University of Ioannina.
Verhoeven, Elisabeth
2009bGrammaticalization in constructions: Clitic doubling with experiencers in Modern Greek. In Studies on Grammaticalization, Elisabeth Verhoeven, Stavros Skopeteas, Young-Min Shin, Yoko Nishina & Johannes Helmbrecht (eds), 251–281. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Verhoeven, Elisabeth
2010Agentivity and stativity in experiencer verbs: Implications for a typology of verb classes. Linguistic Typology 14(2–3): 213–251.
Cited by
Cited by 18 other publications
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A. & Karen De Clercq
2019. From negative cleft to external negator. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 228 ff.
Batllori, Montserrat, Elisabeth Gibert-Sotelo & Isabel Pujol
2019. Changes in the argument and event structure of psych verbs in the history of Spanish. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 249 ff.
Bernstein, Judy, Francisco Ordóñez & Francesc Roca
2019. On the emergence of personal articles in the history of Catalan. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 88 ff.
Blümel, Andreas & Marco Coniglio
2019. What kind of constructions yield what kind of constructions?. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 131 ff.
Miriam Bouzouita, Anne Breitbarth, Lieven Danckaert & Elisabeth Witzenhausen
2019. Cycles in Language Change,
Breitbarth, Anne, Lieven Danckaert, Elisabeth Witzenhausen & Miriam Bouzouita
2019. Cycling through diachrony. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 1 ff.
De Clercq, Karen
2019. French negation, the Superset Principle, and Feature Conservation. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 199 ff.
Fischer, Susann, Mario Navarro & Jorge Vega Vilanova
2019. The clitic doubling parameter. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 52 ff.
Fuß, Eric
2019. When morphological and syntactic change are not in sync. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 33 ff.
Garzonio, Jacopo & Silvia Rossi
2019. Weak elements in cycles. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 71 ff.
Kinn, Kari
2019. Bare singular nouns in Middle Norwegian. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 109 ff.
Moreno, Mitrović
2019. Quantificational cycles and shifts. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 155 ff.
Poletto, Cecilia & Emanuela Sanfelici
2019. On the relative cycle. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 177 ff.
Sanromán Vilas, Begoña
2021. La discordancia de número en el doblado de objeto indirecto: nuevos datos del español de Galicia. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 137:2 ► pp. 477 ff.
van Gelderen, Elly
2019. Cyclical change and problems of projection. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 13 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Copyright Page. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Series preface. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. vii ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. List of abbreviations. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. ix ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.