Chapter published in:
Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, Variationist and Comparative Perspectives
Edited by Andreas Dufter and Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 214] 2014
► pp. 253282
References

References

Adger, David
2007Stress and phasal syntax. Linguistic Analysis 33(3–4): 238–266.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2 ], Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio
1999On focus vs. wh-movement: The case of Caribbean Spanish. Sophia Linguistica 44–45: 1–32.Google Scholar
Camacho, José
2006 In situ focus in Caribbean Spanish: Towards a unified account of focus. In Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium , 13–23. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2002Against optional and null clitics. Right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia Linguistica 56(1): 29–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1976Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2(4): 303–351.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language , Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam
2000The primitives of temporal relations. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik , Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 157–186. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2007The syntax of time arguments. Lingua 117(2): 330–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel, Meinunger, André & Wilder, Chris
2000Pseudoclefts and ellipsis. Studia Linguistica 54(1): 41–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drubig, Hans Bernhard
1994 Island constraints and the syntactic nature of focus and association with focus [Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340 “Sprachtheoretische Grundlagen für die Computerlinguistik” 51]. Tübingen: University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, Olga
2009On the nature of covert operations: the case of focus in Spanish pseudo-clefts. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 2007 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1], Enoch O. Aboh, Elisabeth van der Linden, Josep Quer & Petra Sleeman (eds), 87–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin
1997Questions. In Handbook of Logic and Language , Jan van Benthem & Alice ter Meulen (eds), 1055–1124. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James & May, Robert
1981Questions, quantifiers and crossing. The Linguistic Review 1(1): 41–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Roger
1976 The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English . Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan
2009 The Syntax of Sentential Stress . Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É.
2007Topic and Focus: Two structural positions associated with logical functions in the left-periphery of the Hungarian sentence. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6 [Working Papers of SFB 632], Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds), 69–81. Potsdam: University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1995A time relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 71(4): 669–695. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1991Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The Generic Book , Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds), 125–175. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1991A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In Informationsstruktur und Grammatik [Linguistische Berichte Sonderhefte 4], Joachim Jacobs (ed.), 17–53. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
2006Association with focus phrases. In The Architecture of Focus , Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds), 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Vallejo, Catalina
2009Focalizing SER (‘TO BE’) in Colombian Spanish. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Molnár, Valéria & Winkler, Susanne
2010Edges and gaps: contrast at the interfaces. Lingua 120(6): 1392–1415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco
1997Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and Other Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, CUNY.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the Left Periphery. In Elements of Grammar. Handbook of Generative Syntax , Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1985Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Ross, John
1972Act. In Semantics of Natural Language , Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds), 10–126. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe
1998Pseudocleft connectivity and the structure of noun phrases. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
2003Clausal equations (a note on the connectivity problem). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(1):157–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota
1991 The Parameter of Aspect . Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stowell, Timothy
1993The syntax of tense. Ms, UCLA.Google Scholar
Zagona, Karen
1990Times as temporal argument structure. Paper presented at the conference “Time in Language”. Cambridge MA: MIT.
1995Temporal argument structure: configurational elements of construal. In Temporal Reference, Aspect and Actionality . Vol. 1: Semantic and Syntactic Perspectives , Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentino Bianchi, James Higginbotham & Mario Squartini (eds), 397–410. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
2013Tense, aspect and modality. In The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax , Marcel den Dikken (ed.), 746–792. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
1998 Prosody, Focus, and Word Order . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Vercauteren, Aleksandra
2018.  In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 13],  pp. 297 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.