Cover not available
Part of
Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, Variationist and Comparative Perspectives
Edited by Andreas Dufter and Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 214] 2014
► pp. 283–308

Chapter 10. Informational status and the semantics 
of mood in Spanish preposed complement clauses

| University of Cologne
This corpus-based study examines the principles of mood selection in Spanish preposed complement clauses. It tries to prove that the relevant factor for mood selection is not the informational status of the preposed complement clause but its semantic nature or, more precisely, the contrast between intensional and referential readings. This contrast constitutes a specific principle of the Spanish (and that of Romance in general) mood system which comes to bear whenever the subordinate complement clause is not under the scope of a modal operator. This article also shows how the speakers exploit this specific mood contrast in order to produce certain pragmatic and/or stylistic effects.
Published online: 31 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.214.15bec
References (35)
References
CORDE = Real Academia Española. Corpus diacrónico del español. <[URL]> (10 May 2012).
CREA = Real Academia Española. Corpus de referencia del español actual. <[URL]> (21 May 2012).
Farkas, Donka. 1992. On the semantics of subjunctive complements. In Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory , Paul Hirschbühler & Konrad Koerner (eds), 69–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1997[1892]. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. In Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung. Fünf logische Studien , Günther Patzig (ed.), 40–65. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck. English translation: On sense and reference, transl. by Max Black. In Readings in the Philosophy of Language (1997), Peter Ludlow (ed.), 563–584. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fuente Gómez, Rafael, Fernández Álvarez, Jesús & Feijoo, Lope G. 1977. El subjuntivo . Madrid: Edi-6.Google Scholar
Gil, Alberto. 2002. Zum Verhältnis von Grammatik und Pragmatik bei iberoromanischen Faktivsätzen. In Gramática y pragmática del español. Actas de la sección Grammatik und Pragmatik im Spanischen del XIII. Deutscher Hispanistentag, Leipzig (8.–11.III.2001) , Alberto Gil & Christian Schmitt (eds), 37–56. Bonn: Romanistischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Pianesi, Fabio. 1997. Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gsell, Otto & Wandruszka, Ulrich. 1986. Der romanische Konjunktiv . Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Guitart, Jorge M. 1984. Syntax, semantics and pragmatics of mood in Spanish noun clauses. Hispanic Journal 6(1): 159–177.Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk. 2002. The Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Spanish Mood [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 96]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1992. Presuppositional projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9(3): 183–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Martin. 2004. El valor básico del subjuntivo español y románico . Cáceres: Universidad de Extremadura.Google Scholar
. 2005. Zum Gebrauch des Konjunktivs im gesprochenen Spanisch Chiles. In Sprache in Iberoamerika, Festschrift für Wolf Dietrich zum 65 . Geburtstag, Volker Noll & Haralambos Symeonidis (eds), 313–339. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Hunnius, Klaus. 1971. Zur Synchronie und Diachronie des Satztypus Qu’il vienne, c’est certain . Romanistisches Jahrbuch 22: 25–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, Bob. 2001. Spanish subjunctive mood: One form, more than one meaning? In Adverbial Modification , Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bob de Jonge, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Arie Molendijk (eds), 79–92. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Kiparsky, Carol. 1971. Fact. In Semantics. An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology , Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits (eds), 345–369. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Krakusin, M. 1992. Selección del modo después de el hecho de que . Hispania 75(5): 1289–1293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1978. Semantik der Rede: Kontexttheorie, Modalwörter, Konditionalsätze . Königstein: Skriptor.Google Scholar
. 1991. Modality. In Semantics , Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 639–650. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel. 1999. La subordinación sustantiva: las subordinadas enunciativas en los complementos nominales. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española , Vol. 2, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2083–2104. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Lerch, Eugen. 1920. Der Konjunktiv des psychologischen Subjekts im Französischen. Die neueren Sprachen 27: 338–344.Google Scholar
Lunn, Patricia V. 1989. The Spanish subjunctive and relevance. In Studies in Romance Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 60], Carl Kirschner & Janet Ann DeCesaris (eds), 249–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mejías-Bikandi, Errapel. 1998. Presupposition and old information in the use of the subjunctive mood in Spanish. Hispania 81(4): 941–948. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moignet, Gérard. 1959. Essai sur le mode subjonctif en latin postclassique et en ancien français, Vol. 2. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Palmerini, Mónica. 2006. Factividad en la nominalización: sobre la estructura [el hecho/il fatto] + subordinada en español e italiano. In Studies in Contrastive Linguistics: Proceedings of the 4th International Contrastive Linguistics Conference (Santiago de Compostela) , Cristina Mourón Figueroa & Teresa Moralejo Gárate (eds), 761–768. Santiago: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Regula, Moritz. 1925. Über die modale und psychodynamische Bedeutung der französischen Modi im Nebensatze. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 45: 129–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riegel, Martin, Pellat, Jean-Christophe & Rioul, René. 1999. Grammaire méthodique du français . 5th edn. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax , Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Shrage, Laurie. 1981. Factivity and the emotives. Studies in Language 5(2): 279–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1978. Assertion. In Syntax and Semantics 9 , Peter Cole (ed.), 315–332. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Togeby, Knud. 1953. Mode, aspect et temps en espagnol . Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Terrell, Tracy & Hooper, Joan. 1974. A semantically based analysis of mood in Spanish. Hispania 57(3): 484–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villalta, Elisabeth. 2005. Comparative semantics for subjunctive mood. In Romance Syntax, Semantics and L2 Acquisition. Selected Papers from the 30th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 216], Joaquim Camps & Caroline R. Wiltshire (eds), 227–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wandruszka, Ulrich. 1991. Frasi subordinate al congiuntivo. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione , Vol. 2, Lorenzo Renzi & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 415–481. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wall, Albert & Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta
2016. Exploring and recycling. In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336], ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.